Yzermandius19

AOC can't run against Trump, too young, have to be 35 to run for POTUS. The Democrats are going to run a donkey against Trump in 2020, so if the economy doesn't go into the tank, then 2020 is the bag for him. Also Trudeau is going to get re-elected as well, Scheer stands no chance, and the NDP is boxed out, it will take something big for either Trump or Trudeau to not get re-elected. The people who think that Trump and/or Trudeau are going to lose the next election are either uninformed or way too deep into wishful thinking to properly analyze the situation, they just can't see clearly. Trumpdeau doesn't to have to outrun Usain Bolt, they just have to be faster than the competition they are running against, and in both cases the competition is very weak.

Forgot a few, and corrected another, my bad.

We can show a horse the light of civilization, but we can't make it drink, Eskimo Communism can be hard to shake.

My prediction: Trump wins re-election easily, because the Democrats will put up a Romney/Kerry/Dole/Mondale/McGovern (A donk of a nominee, with no chance of victory) candidate to run against him, not just because the Dems have no two-term POTUS waiting in the wings, but also because, even if they did, they'd likely keep their powder dry until they aren't running against an incumbent presidential candidate, in 2024. Side Prediction: Mueller Investigation is Starr Investigation 2.0 We'll see which one of us is right.

When he gets re-elected in 2020, you'll say that was a fluke too. Insert eye roll here.

Trump lost a game he wasn't playing, whoop dee doo. Electoral College is all that matters, popular vote is irrelevant, you are basically saying "Yeah, well, the other team got more yards gained, who cares about the points on the scoreboard of this football game? Hillary got more yards!", keep the laughs coming.

All politicians are conmen, The Donald won because he was the better conman than Hillary. There was no POTUS candidate in 2016 who wasn't a conman, I grade Trump on a curve, not against an unelectable unicorn who never lies. /shrugs

Trump lies about as much as most politicians, he's just better at it than most. Grade Trump against the mythical unicorn if you want to, I compare him to other politicians, and other POTUS's in particular.

All politicians lie, or they lost to a politician who did. I grade on a curve, not against some mythical unicorn POTUS who never lies and who will never be elected. If you want to grade Trump against perfection, that's your problem, not mine.

Trump is hiding his connections to Russia, because his haters have concocted a narrative about the Russians stealing the election, and he wants his presidency to be seen as legitimate. Of course that is only a guess, I can't read Trump's mind, but his haters seem to think they can, and Trump is obviously a criminal for talking to Russians to them, despite it not being illegal, and he doesn't want to give them any bullshit they can twist to their political advantage. Lies aren't only told to cover up crimes, lies have far more uses than that, politicians know. My guess requires less assumptions than yours, Occam's Razor FTW.

The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense. Lack of proof isn't grounds for jumping to unproven accusations.

Neither of which, are illegal, same-same. Starr had nothing on Clinton, Mueller has nothing on Trump, the only reason you can't see the obvious similarity, is your hatred of Trump blinds you, while you didn't hate Clinton enough to not see the bullshit.

They lied because they don't want the public to know the truth, which may or may not have been because there was a crime committed, until there is proof of a crime, which there isn't, it makes no sense to assume that they lied only because a crime was committed.

Clinton did the same thing, and the Republicans claimed they had a smoking gun they never had. Trump is simply stealing from Clinton's playbook, this time the shoe is simply on the other foot. Trump Haters are unable to see how Clintonesque the Mueller Investigation when they called out the Starr Investigation for the same thing, but now because the witch hunt is against a POTUS they don't like, so they forgot how counter-productive their actions are because they are so desperate to get rid of Trump.

It wasn't advantageous to tell the truth. Assuming a crime has been committed with no proof, simply because a politician lied, is asinine.

Yeah it tells you to leap to conclusions filled in by your confirmation bias. The reason they lied, is because it's not politically advantageous to tell the truth, that does not mean that Trump committed any crime, it could simply mean that Trump doesn't want to be embarrassed by a political witch hunt, and what politician would want to be embarrassed by a politicial witch hunt.

No we haven't, the Democrats are no closer to removing Trump for office than they were back then. Lying about Russian contacts is not illegal, Republicans impeached Clinton for lying, that didn't go well now did it? If the Dems impeach Trump for lying about Russia, the result will be the same when the GOP impeached Clinton for lying about Lewinski. Starr had nothing, Mueller has nothing, you are falling for the same trap that Clinton Haters fell for in the late 90's.

No they won't, because Mueller's report will contain none of that. When the Mueller report comes out, you are going to be quite disappointed, and then you'll probably accuse Mueller of covering up for Trump because he didn't find a smoking gun.

Clinton Haters slit their own throat with attempts at impeachment and Trump Haters are poised to learn none of those lessons.

The GOP need only 34 votes in the Senate to avoid impeachment, even with 35% of the seats in the Senate, that would be enough to prevent removing Trump from office. You are putting your hopes in a pipe dream fueled entirely by wishful thinking.

None of which will be the end of Trump. The GOP Senators aren't about to throw him under the bus because of that, thinking they will is wishful thinking.

66 Senate votes to impeach Trump? Yeah, even if the Democrats had control of the Senate, that is never going to happen.

Wishful thinking, it's all coming apart for the Trump Haters, Bob Mueller has jack shit, same as Ken Starr, you just wish the former had the goods.

Democrats have no leverage at all, Impeachment is the Obi Wan Kenobi Trap. Obama haters were fairly counter-productive themselves, but Trump haters are putting them to shame and easily surpassing them. Trump most closely resembles Bill Clinton when it comes to his political opposition hurting their own cause.

I mean I get that people are wishful thinking that Trump will lose, but when you look at his potential competition, it's pretty hard to see him losing to any of them.