Yzermandius19

You forgot Jair Bolsonaro, no doubt you lump him in with the rest, lulz.

Sounds like a pretty sweet deal if those are the biggest "drawbacks".

Indeed, and when they re-elect him, then what?

Obama doubled the US national debt, is that somehow Trump's fault too?

Obama did that too. Raise The Debt Ceiling.

Just kick Quebec out, or let them leave. Do the same with the West, problem solved. Confederation is the problem. Quebec ain't going to stay in if you kill their over-representation in the Senate, hell they ain't going to stay even if you let them keep it.

Obama said it was impossible to achieve 3% GDP growth, and now he wants to take credit for it, even though Trump told him it was, and then delivered. Trump getting elected juiced the markets, because they knew the finger waving Democrats telling people they couldn't have 3% growth weren't in power anymore.

So the Liberals can win all the seats in Quebec far more easily? Sounds like a bad idea, that would just further entrench the Liberal Party of Canada as the natural governing party of Canada and make it much harder for the Conservatives to win by splitting the left. Canada's electoral system works pretty well up here. I wouldn't advise America to adopt it though.

Yup and he held back the American recovery, just like FDR, and he gets lionized for it. It's pretty funny.

For someone whose supporters claim had such a high IQ, Obama sure did a pretty lame job as President. So even if true, it didn't help him much in office.

Trump ain't as dumb as you think he is. I don't see any reason to be more worried about Trump's finger on the button than I would be with Obama's finger on the button. They can't just nuke anyone on a whim anyway, they need a legitimate reason, or the order will be refused.

Nah, Trump is doing a terrible job, but so has every President since they developed nukes, they just keep kicking the can down the road, instead of dealing with before the costs become to great to deal with it.

Obama is not nearly as smart as his supporters think he is and Trump is not nearly as stupid as his haters think he is.

I would say US foreign policy isn't as heavily influenced by the IQ of the POTUS as you think it is, especially when it comes to NK. Obama is no exception.

Well then the IQ of every other President is such the they can be easily had, as this problem didn't start with Trump, it started with Eisenhower.

Trump should take out their nukes, but doesn't look like he's going to. He'd rather negotiate for the sake of negotiation instead.

Why would Canada do anything about it, when it can't do anything about it? Best Canada could do was help you bomb them after you take them out with counterforce, and even then only with a token presence.

Not true. Lawyers like publicity for going after major targets, even when there is no validity. Look at Avenatti, perfect example.

Innocent until proven guilty. Accusations of rich famous people are a dime a dozen, as are accusations of much hated political figures.

If it's consensual, it's not sexual assault. Some women want to be grabbed by rich famous guys, whether you see the attraction or not.

The majority of voters in a majority of states have no morals because they don't agree with you. That's not analysis colored by hatred for Trump, that's a perfectly reasonable summation of what happened.

Okay Trump Hater, overreaching remarks like that is what is driving swing voters away from the Democrats.

Trump said they wanted it. Some women throw themselves at rich famous guys, this isn't unheard of, not at all. Not all women would do it, but enough of them would that it's entirely possible that every p***y Trump ever grabbed was consensual.

A small minority won in districts that would never vote Republican, that is not indicative of what the rest of the electorate wants, or even what most Democrats want.

If the women want you to grab them by the p***y, then it's not sexual assault. You are assuming that the women he grabbed, didn't want to be grabbed, because of your anti-Trump bias.