Yzermandius19

going to China won the Cold War you are letting idealism get in the way of realpolitik in order to defeat Hitler, a war needed to be fought you got to ask yourself would you rather have fought the Soviets than have Nixon go to China? obvious better solution is obvious divide and conquering the non-monolithic communists ftw

they have a great environment, far better protected than most, and their population is stable the fires are a result of poor forest management pushed by so called environmentalists and being hit by hurricanes is hardly America's fault that climate agreement did nothing for the environment they are least hateful country on the planet, particularly towards their minorities, who do better in America than they do anywhere else in the world

you have America Derangement Syndrome and the image that repulses you is a strawman constructed by America haters when it comes to the ideals you claim to hold, America is better at producing results on those measures than anyone else in the world, despite the propaganda saying otherwise you weren't only lied to about what Canada is, but what America is as well

the other men's teams bring in the money the other women's teams don't that's why the men get paid more, a bigger pie leaves larger pieces for all talk to me when the women's world cup generates as much as the men's except that won't happen because no one gives a shit about chick soccer but if it did, then the women would be as well paid as the men, until then they won't be they are whiners, demanding to be paid more relative to the profit generated than the men, while claiming to be champions of equality

less government handouts, collectivism, segregation, paternalism and more private property, integration and individual freedom more charity, less bureaucracy

Canada is such a great place to live because of it's proximity and relationship with the most prosperous and powerful nation on the planet and it's British system of governance and culture that can be a double-edged sword, as Canada imports plenty of the negatives to go with the positives

you can be disappointed they failed to live up to their ideals just keep things in proper perspective that everyone else was worse, often by a rather wide margin

if they hadn't dominated the world, someone else would have be grateful it was the British, and not their more oppressive competition if not for them, the world would be a far worse place today the places the British ruled are many of the best places to live on the earth because of them and those places are far better off than the places ruled by their competition that isn't a coincidence

you haven't heard of it, because you didn't look for it If you think the French, Spanish and Portuguese weren't worse slavers than the British, you don't know history the British were the first to get rid of slavery and pushed the others to get rid of it the British also treated the indigenous better than others as well the British were the least oppressive of the bunch if you want to claim a false equivalence and play moral relativistic games, because of your disappointment that the British weren't saints that is not the proper response if you don't have respect for British culture, then you don't respect any culture or you respect cultures that were more oppressive than the British, while not respecting the British for engaging in less oppression than anyone else, which makes no sense

you are the liar pretending all Christians are inherently immoral talk about scapegoating projection is a helluva drug you fuck off

they can choose whether to listen to the devil or not they choose poorly and reaped the consequences God told them not to eat the fruit, they chose not to listen it's not like they forgot God told them not to eat it they were well aware and perfectly capable of choosing not to eat it instead they chose to eat it, on the advice of a serpent play stupid games, win stupid prizes

when the "doing something" is counter-productive "doing something" isn't helping stop looking to the government as a solution to the problem that government intervention created and continues to exacerbate in the name of "doing something" stop scapegoating others as not wanting to help because they point out the flaws in your preferred method of "helping"

non hypocritical Christians don't abdicate responsibility for their sins or scapegoat Jesus stop looking to the bad examples and pretend there are no good examples

free will has consequences allowing free will is not neglect God didn't murder anyone

Men are not dolls controlled by God they did the murdering of their own free will God did not murder God doesn't force people to be good God doesn't force people to be bad people are free to make the choice for themselves and bear the consequences of those choices sparring others from the consequences of their own actions and blaming God for those consequences does not make moral people

you can't solve social issues by throwing money at the problem heavy handed government intervention makes the problem worse the road to hell is paved with good intentions equality of opportunity and equity of outcome are not the same thing achieving the former is desirable, achieving the latter is not meritocracy ftw

if you go there you'll find the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Belgians treated their colonies worse and their former colonies are much worse off than former British colonies things are very clear, you just haven't looked into it, so you ask questions to which the answers are well known

the indigenous were treated worse by others than they were by the British, including by themselves Ireland and Scotland are very well off countries, because of their links with Britain those who lived under British rule faired far better than those who lived under the rule of others you might be unaware of that fact, but the historical record is quite clear those who beg to differ are talking out of their ass

US Women's team are just a bunch of woke whiners anyway revolting

obvious lesser evil is obvious the British are clearly better than most false equivalence via moral relativism is not needed it is vacuous virtue signaling

you'd have to do that to get me or most human beings to watch women's soccer which is why they don't make nearly as much as the men

well then chick soccer is worse than them, by a wide margin particularly in the case of football, hockey and basketball

hard no comparing women's sports to their male counterparts the women are nowhere near as good, it's not even close the only exceptions are sports that are too boring too watch like volleyball or curling where attractive women give you something to watch instead of nothing they still aren't anywhere near as good at those sports though

you're weird women's soccer is rubbish most women's sports aren't entertaining at all

open 'er up