olp1fan

Derek, MacKay wouldn't sue even if they said this outside of QP or the HOC If he sued he'd have to swear to the queen (right? swear to somebody) and thats jail time if he lies..and the evidence is clearly there you can mention those two potential witnesses all you want but who do you think told them to say that? do you honestly believe they just came and said that stuff by themselves? HAHAHAHA This is MacKay backed in a corner..he should've done what Clement did and not said a thing

\ So we'll continue to support Kyoto right now but the deal was China would start during 2020? not much of a deal

Harpers gonna mute MacKay soon enough and he'll be the next Tony Clement laughing stock of QP

How is it libel or slander if there is documented proof he has been lying? Derek the issue is not mackay flying its him lying about it for a year covering it up

hockey players have to be in better physical shape than soccer players

i said you need to win 3 rounds to advance to the stanley cup (yes i forgot to add finals but you dont hear ppl say finals often unless its on tv) we're both right i just worded it differently btw playoff format has not been decided yet will be in march and who the fark are you to tell me what my thing is or isnt? jerk

lol you are the one spinning here

you need to win 3 rounds to advance to the stanley cup quarter finals, semi finals conference finals ... best of 7 series winners from each conference go on to a 7 game series winner wins the cup HOWEVER next year the format will be different as the NHL is going through a realignment no one knows how the playoffs will work yet

considering they had to get there via airplane they are a bunch of hypocrites polluting the atmosphere

When will Canada demand respect from the US? Canada should go on strike!! http://m.ctv.ca/toronto/20111207/Harper_border_security_deal_Obama-111207.html While Canadian news outlets were doing a full-court press to cover the new border deal with the United States, it appears that the response south of the border could better be defined as "meh." Stephen Harper met U.S. President Barack Obama at the White House Wednesday afternoon, but there was no pomp and ceremony planned – no state dinner and apparently no photo op in the Oval Office. As well, a search of two major U.S. newspapers - The New York Times and Washington Post - yields nary a word about Harper's visit. But for navel-gazing Canadians, at least the Times was still playing up its recent story on NHL tough guys and brain injuries. On CNN's website, Obama's schedule is posted, noting a 2:15 p.m. "bilateral meeting" with Harper followed by statements from the two at 3 p.m., before Obama heads off to a campaign event at 4:35 p.m. A White House agenda posted online simply states "the (Oval Office) meeting is closed press." That led Washington's WTOP Radio political commentator Mark Plotkin to suggest to CTV News Channel the prime minister was apparently given a choice between an Oval Office photo op, or public statements with the president afterward. Andrew MacDougall, associate director of communications with the PMO, declined to answer whether Harper was given a choice, but did reply in an email to CTVNews.ca confirming meeting times. But Plotkin decried his country's apathy toward its northern neighbour. "This is the same country that seems to be continually snubbed by this president," he said. "I must wonder why no state dinner for this prime minister? They had a state dinner for Mexico – nothing for Canada. I think you're treated quite shabbily by this administration," he said. Does Mexico get better treatment because of the large Hispanic voting community in the U.S.? Do the Democrats play up this connection? If there's any political gain in today's announcement for Obama, who faces an election in 2012, it's telling America he's tough on border security in the south and north, Plotkin added. That aside, he said Harper's visit is still being treated like a diplomatic and political "quickie." "There is no fanfare, there is no buzz, there is not even information that he is here in this city," he said. "Why do you stand for it?" he added, exasperated.

Yeah staging a stop harper protest on tv is so savvvvvy after he won enough votes to not be stopped your hero is sooooo smart

Its not Barney Fife we are worried about.. its Vic Mackey

large enough scandal .. angry cpc voters, rifts in parties... majorities can fall more often than you realize harper muzzling his mps for 4 yrs is too long without something breaking

I could sue you right now but doesnt mean I'd win

Then report me as I have reported you if brigette gets an account she can report me too

she doesnt post here does she?

id give her props had she sacraficed easy money before the election to do what she did but she waited until her contract was almost up she gets no respect for being an opportunist who feeds off her own ego

MacKay is consideing suing the opposition parties lol he will lose in court http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/12/07/pol-cp-mackay-threat.html what a frickin weiner

At this rate the governments likely to fall before their mandate is up

soon to be used against OWS

it wasnt ludicrious at all it was an example of how WE feel and how youd feel the same way

Apology accepted

why are you attacking my intelligence wyly?

Not the right to marry nor do most have the right to adopt

these posters put her on a pedestal.. shes no smarter than your average Belieber