H10

One of the things I do notice, is there does seem to be a minority of whites who are incapable of taking any criticism nor being subject matter of any discussion. We have threads about arabs, blacks, asians, indians, aboriginal crimes etc. But when one is made on whites, and they are asked to account for their actions, why is it automatically for some whites to talk about blacks or hispanics or asians, or arabs? Why aren't we allowed to talk about white crime in your view? Why can we not talk about what is causing white crime. This week over 200 arrested, 9 dead in a single day, and we are suppose to pretend like there isn't a white criminal problem? White Americans constitute 70% of all arrested and 40% of white americans will be arrested at some point. That is almost as much as the entire population of the Philippines. Are you going to just ignore all the stats and deny white crime is a problem, despite whites committing 80% of sex assaults in the united states each year? As for black crime there is a 13 page long thread on it, feel free to post your stats on blacks over there. This thread is specifically about white crime.

To be accurate European whites never figured out germ theory either, they just take credit for a pre-existing idea, the africans and chinese had already been practicing vaccination for 2000 years before the europeans had any knowledge of germs; kind of like how they claim to discover americas.

So you are saying the violence in white culture is just part of the bad that comes along with good parts of white culture? Please expand. Where does this white fear of enslavement come from? Most whites were not enslaved in any recent period. Although the Romans had slaves not all of them were white, most of them were not western europeans, who are the ones making most the white inventions. Why do whites have such a deep fear of slavery in the modern era, when they hadn't been enslaved in large numbers in probably millenniunas?

This week almost 200 white men were arrested and 9 left shot dead, after a break out of white racial violence,again, in waco texas. waco is the same texas city where a white man by the name of David Koresh launch an all out war on federal agents leading to the death of over 76 people. http://newsone.com/3115717/9-dead-texas-biker-gang-shootout-police-response/ I initially didn't intend to post this story from a racial/cultural perspective. But I was just over on another thread on the exact same topic except on black culture/people. Further I recalled another current event where a professor at Boston University Saida Grundy raised an interesting question about white culture. Often we don't think of these as white cultural problems or issues, we almost never discuss them. There isn't a thread I can see on here about white racial violence. Then you had the North Carolina cop shooting the black man in the back, and the white Soviet terrorist bomber Tsarnaev who has just been sentenced to death after killing 5 people, injuring 16 cops and maiming almost 300 people. Then you have the Sandy hook shooting where a young white man shot and killed 28 people mostly children and himself. Then you have the Cindy Gladue case where a white canadian man raped a native indian woman to death and was let off scott free with murder? Why did white jurors find this acceptable? Had an indian man raped a white woman to death he would be in prison so fast his head would spin! http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/cindy-gladue-case-why-the-not-guilty-verdict-has-sparked-outrage-1.2309102 And Jared Lee Loughner who shot 11 people, killed 6 including a federal judge and brain damaged promising congress woman. Then you have Joseph Jesse Aldridge who in 2015, shot and killed 8 people And Ronald Lee Haskell, Jr, who in 2014 shot and killed 6 people. Oh and James Eagan Holmes who was the dark knight shooter wounded 70 and killed 12 You also have the sikh temple shooter. And the Anders Brevik shooting and bombing which resulted in over 200 injured and almost 100 dead. "In 1921, over a 24-hour time period, whites destroyed the prosperous black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. White rioters used machine guns and dropped bombs (in what may be one of the first recorded uses of a plane for that purpose) on the black community. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred black people were killed. Scholars such as James Loewen estimate that as many as 3,000 black communities were “ethnically cleansed” by white violence and other means of intimidation" Historian Gregory Downs has suggested that as many as 50,000 black Americans were killed by white racial terrorism in the 30 years following the end of the American Civil War. This total may not even include at least 4,000 blacks who were victims of lynchings by whites across the South and other parts of the United States." http://www.salon.com/2015/05/01/white_americas_racial_amnesia_the_sobering_truth_about_our_countrys_race_riots_partner/ " Pew estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and just 32 percent of Hispanic dads." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/13/black-fatherhood-statistics_n_5491980.html What role do white absent fathers play in this? Whites who form 62% of the population are arrested for 75% of all rapes in America according to the FBI and upwards of 80% of all sex assaults. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/SOO.PDF " But a new report from the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) shows that the American past is even bloodier than we thought. According to “Lynching in America: Confronting the Legacy of Racial Terror,” between the years 1877 and 1950, nearly 4,000 African-Americans were lynched by Southern whites. In fact, during the years spent researching for the report, EJI claims to have found at least 700 more examples of racial terrorism than previously known. And as EJI founder and leader Bryan Stevenson recently told the New York Times, these barbaric acts of violence had a symbolic, political purpose, just like ISIS’s most-publicized crimes." More people were murdered than under 9/11, yet almost none of these people were held to account for their violent actions. You even had another white man shoot at George Zimmerman, a 19 year old hispanic man in long beach gun downed by a white cop and another hispanic man by the last name of zambrano shot to death by another white cop. "Video footage that showed the Mexican man running away, then turning around with arms outstretched just as police fired, prompted months of protests." http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/22/antonio-zambrano-montes-pasco-shooting-police-saved-fire "Sandeep Singh, a 29-year-old Sikh man, who was run over and dragged 30 feet by a white man driving a pickup truck in Queens, shouting “Go back to your own country, Bin Laden!” http://www.racefiles.com/2014/08/20/why-ferguson-matters-to-asian-americans/ "filipino woman shot dead by white cops in costco" http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Deputy-Shot-at-Costco-in-Sterling-209389621.html Vietnamese woman murdered by white cop "Tran's death and a grand jury's refusal to indict Officer Chad Marshall galvanized the area's Vietnamese Americans to action like nothing else in their nearly 30-year history in San Jose. " http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Police-shooting-in-San-Jose-stirs-Vietnamese-into-2507951.php White police man murder Asian Yee Vang and no indictement. White cops also shot Phuong Na in vancouverhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-police-shooting-captured-on-video-by-teen-1.2848561 There also seems to be from the Vietnamese perspective a pattern of anti-vietnamese white police brutality in american cities like San Jose http://www.asian-nation.org/headlines/2009/11/incidents-anti-vietnamese-police-brutality-san-jose/ http://thesocietypages.org/colorline/2009/11/02/incidents-of-anti-vietnamese-police-brutality-in-san-jose/ http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_13498199?source=infinite Another young vietnamese man gun downed by white cops with no indictment Do you think there is a white racial violence problem? And if so what is the root cause of this problem? Is it something to do with the white culture glorifying guns and violence? Why does there appear to be a pattern of white people and white police targeting Asians, hispanics, native indian, indian and blacks like this? What is it in the white culture that makes young white men believe this type of behaviour is normal. And what of the white women and men who refuse to indict or convict white men who are seemingly guilty of these types of crimes? How come we don't talk more about white racial violence when there are so many examples of it like the ones listed above. In Canada, whites are convicted of over 67% of all crimes and outnumber the next largest group (aborginals) by about 3-5 times despite being stopped at a far less rate. What role does white underclass culture play in this. While black Canadians form just 5% of the population they are targeted for 42% of all hate crimes. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2014001/article/14028-eng.htm According to Dr. Boyce Watkins study, if whites were stopped at the same rate as non-whites in America, and prosecuted in a similar manner, whites would form somewhere between 10-20 million of the prison population. This would represent some serious numbers as USA has a prison population of around 1.5-2.3 million americans in jail depending on how it is measured. White Americans represent 70% of all arrest in America, but just 62% of the population according to the fbi figures. https://youtu.be/HgsZ9N8Bs_w http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-43 Whites in Russia have a high crime rate too, as do those in Brazil. "The only other major industrialized nation that even comes close is Russia, with 627 prisoners for every 100,000 people. The others have much lower rates. England's rate is 151; Germany's is 88; and Japan's is 63." http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=all Meaning the 3 most populous white nations, all have very high crime rates and rates of crime of and criminals. "The journal Crime & Delinquency published the study Monday, which found that 49 percent of African-American males and 40 percent of Caucasians had been arrested by 23." http://rt.com/usa/50-black-40-white-arrested-297/ With a population of well over 200 million, there has been more whites arrested in America than total number of blacks, hispanics and asians COMBINED! Of the countries with the 4 highest amounts of criminals sitting in prison, convicted by a jury of their own peers. 3 of the four are white majority. (USA, BRAZIL, RUSSIA, AND CHINA). And in the top ten 7 of 10 are caucasian majority countries according to us census standards. I want to know, what is the root cause of this white crime problem and what can be done to resolve it? And why is it so little discussed? I would appreciate it if members stayed on topic of what is the root cause of this and why it occurs and look forward to hearing people's opinions.

While I typically disagree with Argus, I think he might be correct on this one. ” …Some slaves were stolen by Europeans ‘panyared’- as the english word for Espanola (Spain/portugal) was pronounced – and some as ocurred often in Angola, were the victims of military campaigns mounted specifically by portuguese proconsuls in order to capture slaves…” see Hugh Thomas, The slave trade (1997) , page 792. “Spanish records report that in mid-july, ‘English corsairs’ waylaid and captured the Portuguese slaver Sao Joao Bautista. She had below decks some 370 Angolans, who had been taken prisoner during Portugal’s bloody war of conquest in Luanda” See Don Jordan and Michael Walsh , White Cargo (2008), Page 87. I would wonder, where would you even get the idea that Europeans would be foolish enough to buy a slave when the history of Europe going back to Julius Cesaer was to just invade and raid and take anyone as a slave? The norse did this, the brits, the romans and greeks, no society ever paid for slaves in mass. In fact the English raided Ireland and Wales and other white countries for slaves before slavery became entirely racialized. The russians raided other russians for slaves. St. Patrick was a run away Irish slave captured by english slave raiders. I am also curious as to how you explain all the other races of slaves, like the malays, the indians, the chinese, the filipinos? Do you really think European colonialist armed to the teeth with the best weapons of their time were packing their ships with gold to buy slaves when they could just throw a net on the first people they see and kidnap them? Come to think of it, such a question doesn't need to be answered. It really doesn't make much of a difference of how European sex traffickers and human traffickers, who would go on to committ the largest genocide in history managed to capture their slaves. There are many countries today in Europe, particularly the East, where I could walk into a town and buy a child, or a woman. Human trafficking is a real problem there. No one would fall for the argument that I am justified in buying white women for sale as sex slaves or I have the right to genocide and murder and rape and torture white women slaves because it is white men selling them. A normal well adjusted indiviual would ask, what the hell were you thinking, killing and raping. They wouldn't say, well white people sold you a white woman so you can do as you please.

Affirmative action, where did that come from? The only affirmative action receipeints in Canada are french who have designated roles on the supreme court and designated schools and hiring quotas. Them and white women of course. And you are right, these race quotas are racist, and wrong.

You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. Whites committ the most crime per capita, do highest organized gang, do the most rape and pimping are number one in hate crimes. Whites commit 65% of the crime nation wide, so when a white cop says blacks do 95% of the crime, it simply shows either you are lying or the cop is sharing your white power delusions. Blacks committ the least crime of any group. Dr. Boyce Watkins makes it clear that if whites were prosecuted in the same manner as blacks, there would be about 25 times the number of whites in prisons. Whites are the highest amount of crime committers per capita in every area of society. https://youtu.be/HgsZ9N8Bs_w And if Jamaican cultures devalues education, why are Jamaicans more educated on average in Canada according to stats can than the whites. 21% of Jamaicans have college degrees compared to just 15% of canadians. Britain has majority of its children born out of wedlock, there is a global trend away from marriage amongst young people. 80% of Swedish children are born out of wedlock While 40% of the children in cas in toronto may be black, who is taking the children, WHITES!. So again it goes back to what saida grundy calls the white male college problem population. The rest of your mutterings,well all of them actually are unsubtantiated, there are more hells angels and other biker criminals than blacks in the entire criminal system in canada. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/biker-gangs-in-canada-1.775978 Funny how you completely ignore all these murders by whites when accounting for your statistics. And you are wrong that they do only white collar crime, all those murders are street crime Everything you said about blacks are lies and true of whites.

Here are some additional interesting stats I think of which support africentric schooling. http://financialjuneteenth.com/heres-what-white-teachers-tend-to-do-with-gifted-black-students-its-appalling/ Either way, white teachers spell trouble for black students. Employers Treat Black Men With Degrees Like Criminals http://financialjuneteenth.com/employers-treat-black-man-with-degrees-like-criminals/ https://youtu.be/HgsZ9N8Bs_w So whites treat blacks with degrees like criminals. What good can come from them going to the same school.

^It has to do with people being jackasses not sexism, they are just imitating some youtube obnoxious jackass

I can respect you find it offensive, I can't agree its sexist if I don't understand how

No, I did not misrepresent figures, I did account for population. Your numbers are wrong, blacks account for closer to 5.5% of the population of Canada, there numbers are grossly under-represented by more than 50% on census data as proven by the study done out of Mcgill. Blacks represent 8% of federal inmates not 9%. However when you account for the fact that blacks who are committing no crime are stopped at 4 times the rates of whites and carded and information is kept in a secret government database, you actually are forced to conclude blacks have a lowest rate of crime per police interaction, all factors adjusted. If we were to stop whites at 4 times the current rate, you'd see alot more white criminals. Even if white crime actualy was falling. Then when you throw on the fact that almost all the people freed under innocence projects and appeals for false convictions are blacks or aboriginals, and the embedded biases of whites throughout the court system and the fact that whites have more money so can buy better lawyers too to get them lighter sentences or charges dropped, all adds up to blacks having the LOWEST crime rate of any group. When you consider that whites are stopped less than 1/4th the amount of blacks, are not kept in government databases, generally receive fair trials and fair treatment from a white majority system with a whit cop, white judge, white majority jury and white prosecutor and defence lawyer, most of whom will give the benefit of the doubt to him for being white at all stages. Whites have a far more higher rate of crime than probably any other group in the country. It is why most of the serial rapist and serial killers are whites. When you are white in Canada, you blend in, you are stopped very rarely and when you are its not under a cloud of suspicion. Despite the fact you constitute the vast majority of crime, and the vast majority of federal prisoners, and that whites are convicted by their own white kind at more than 8 times the rate of blacks. The rest of your verbal dribble is unsubstantiated. Whites commit the most rapes, robberies, murders, shooting, stabbing, killing of wife and children etc. http://news-archive.mcgill.ca/w97/black.htm Further, the census doesn't take into account people who are not pr/citizens many of whom are black. There are far more white gangs and white drug users and dealers per capita than any other race. The hells angels, bandidos, the italian mafia, the russian mafia, the french mafia, armenian power and french gangs etc if you go into toronto's black plurality neighbourhoods with high crime the drug dealers are actually all russians not blacks. Most of the sex crimes done in canada are done by white men, and it has always been this way, paul bernardo, picton farmer etc. I think the reason you think all crimes are done by blacks when whites commit 8 times more crime than blacks in Canada is due to the fact that you have a paranoid fear of blacks, which I can't blame you entirely for due to media bias. I recall when the white security guard shot two other white guys in downtown toronto, or when the two white guys murdered each other in downtown toronto. Because whites control the media along with asians and because the whites aren't carded, their faces are never shown on tv. The other thing, is whites think of themselvees as normative. Whites never describe another white person as white in general terms. If a white guy does a crime the description is tall middle aged man with glasses and brown hair did a murder. Just take the white guy who murdered his wife and kids and jumped on the train track, no description of his race has yet come out yet. I just looked on crime stoppers dot ca. of the 12 most wanted 7 are white, 3 are asian and 2 are black. The 2 black ones are wanted for 1) elbowing a passenger on the ttc, and the other black one is wanted for prostituion related thing. The Asians ones is wanted for touching boys, sex assault, sex crimes, robbery with guns and parole violations. The whites ones are wanted fro drugs, sex crimes, shooting, guns, bank robbery and a host of other violent crimes. Your comments are quiet silly when the evidence is out in the open like that. Whites commit the vast majority of crime even in toronto, and the media covers it up. https://222tips.com/ The highest crime in general are in Alberta and the white provinces out west. Whites committ the most violent street by any objective measure. Black poor performance in school is entirely due to racism. Most black families are more educated on average than white families in Canada. according to stats can 21% of jamaican canadians hold college degrees compared to just 15% of canadians and 19% of african canadians have university degrees compared to just 15% of canadians. The blacks in canada are more educated than the whites http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-621-x/89-621-x2007010-eng.htm There are more than enough reports and you can look at the ryerson u and yorku reports on racism to see all the kinds of racism whites engage in against black students or the hrc report on racism in Ontario schools against blacks. Frankly there are so many of such reports. Black parents have gotten tired and having their children attacked by whites that they set up their own schools called africentric schools where they can be free from white racial and sex attacks.

Is it offensive to women, maybe, but which part of it is, I don't get it. But I seen women say it and men say it to male reporters. I think it is just being obnoxious.

Yelling FHRITP is not harassment nor a threat. Criminal harassment264. (1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. Marginal note:Prohibited conduct(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of (a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them; (b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them; (c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or (d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family. Maybe point d, but again, you have to prove it is threatening, and the comment isn't even directed at the reporter, its directed towards the camera! And the guy who is being grilled isn't the one who said fhritp, it is the guy who lauged and said it was funny. Its not a threat to say dumb things. Now if he said I want to rape you or I want to f you right in the p then that would certainly be a threat. But a comment at a camera, isn't a threat. this is a comment directed at an audience to be disruptive and stupid.

Number of white federal prisoners, 15,000. Number of black federal prisoners, 1400. 1200 Asian federal prisoners and 4500 aboriginal federal prisoners. This doesn't even make sense. The focus should be on those committing the vast majority of the crimes, WHITES. When adjusted for the high rate of being stopped by police and population, blacks have among the lowest criminal activities in Canada.of any ethnic group. And do we really want to trot out the history of which race attacks which race more. It would be senseless here, we know how this country was founded and it wasn't on peace treaties. The typical room looks like this where a black person lives. One black person and a bunch of non-black majority white people. So if a white person closes his eyes and shoot a gun he'll have an 80% chance of shooting another white. If a black person does the same the odds remain the same. The criminal elements, the 1400, out of over 1 million black canadians who do commit crime, that tiny element, is doing that due to the fact that racism in school causes them to drop out or throws them out. And when you drop out or are kicked out or thrown out at 14, 13, 15, there isn't no one else who will hire you except the gangs.

The man who yelled fhritp didn't even get in any trouble, just the guy who lauged at and went on camera to say he thought it was funny did. And maybe they are angry and frustrated at not getting laid. I don't know, nor do I have proof of it or not. I don't know the hottest women I known have always been attracted to pathetic losers with a bunch of tattoos on their head, often jobless, and yes indeed low class. In fact many "good men" complain about this type of female behaviour. from my knowledge it is the good men who have the most trouble with women and the jerks seem to have no problem and often have females fighting over them. Yes. agreed. I'm not even sure what the point of it is other than being a jerk. I'd say its annoying, but people have right to free speech and act like a fool.

I do have a general question. What does the court do when two drunk people have sex and one allegedes rape? Both couldn't technically consent, so what happens?

I think nationalism and patriotism are usually bad. They prevent people from seeing obvious problems with their country and its politicians. The most nationalistic societies often tend to be the poorly run ones because the people don't/can't question bad decisions or they are labelled un-insert country here -ican. Its better people compete on valid ideas than vague concepts of patriotism.

I agree with black dog general premise. Police have the right to talk to you, but you suppose to have the right to ignore them if you aren't doing a crime or are not seen doing a crime. carding here isn't about people doing crime. Its about people committing no crime nor having any seeming involvement in crimes being harassed by police for exercising their right to not talk to police.

Who is defining sexism here? Who gets to define and who should be allowed to be the authoritative definer, these are all good questions. If we don't agree on a definition of what sexism is, then we wouldn't agree on its occurence. a drunk guy/girl yelling vulgarities like penis vagina p---- c---k etc. to me, don't represent sexism to me, it represents low brow humour. Yes it certainly does. Because I don't see it your way, and much of society doesn't. If you expect us to accept your view as the norm, it certainly should matter why. If you have a problem with me yelling out FHRITP infront of my employees, and you want to work in my business, you sure as hell better have a reason. And lots of things are offensive to people today who are often so easily offended. There is verbal assault now??? I've only heard rape jokes directed at men and prison rape. fhritp to me means stick a penis in a vagina. Its funny because it is true. No because it doesn't allow me to play the victim Hal, I have the right to play the victim for being a woman, despite the fact that most homeless are men, women outnumber men in middle management jobs, general employment and university degrees and have special laws in their favour and get special affirmative action. How do you know what it is intended to be offensive to? Its a stretch to call it sexist, sexism requires some malise, they aren't even saying it to anyone person in particular, they are just copying some internet dude who made a dumb joke. A dumb joke isn't always sexist, sometimes its just a dumb joke.

It originates from an internet troll who made it on youtube as a series of videos of him video bombing journalist where he jumped on the microphone and yelled it. and it goes on for 3 minutes, I nearly died of laughter

Do you believe men's lives revolve entirely around what women find attractive? If so you are very very mistaken. Its often the opposite. Men in general operate with complete oblivion of how to attract women save for a handful of ladies men. And I assure no such man would be going to a sports game. Typically they are more interested in woman than being a soccer hooligan.

Agreed, funny as hell. You go interview drunks who are at sports game, you deserve to be heckled. The worse was at st. patricks day, interviewing drunken irish men, you're just asking for it.

Why is it offensive to women?

Bad humour is just bad humor. Has nothing to do with sexism.

^What if they don't have parents?