blackbird

Watch this 3 hour video with a complete history of the Jesuits and you will understand the threat from the Jesuits. They have been banned from many countries over the centuries since they were founded in the 1500s because of their serious interference in countries. They managed to get back in many countries. One of their purposes for being formed was to reverse the Reformation which began in the 1500s and eliminate Protestantism and bring the world (at least the west) under the dominion of the Papacy. All political leaders of western nations bow to the Pope who is the most powerful politician in the western world. Trudeau himself said evangelicals are the worst kind of Canadians. What does that tell you about his ideology? We know Trudeau and Liberals are diehard globalists. So is the Pope. Many of them are members of Romanism. Globalism appeals to them. Have they been indoctrinated by Jesuitism which founded some universities in Quebec and elsewhere. They believe in control of the world so of course they would promote one world government. There are countless videos on youtube warning about one world government. One good one is at this link. It is 1 hr 5 mins in length but interesting. Amir Tsarfati: The Illuminati and the One World Government - Bing video The Entire History On 'The Jesuit Order' & The Plans Of World Domination Full Documentary YouTube - Bing video Be warned there are many Jesuit websites that paint a completely different picture.

" His story is worth telling. He took over as chief of the southern Saskatchewan band in 1991, when he was only 23 years old. The band’s books were in bad shape, and his people were on the brink of third-party management. Two decades later, the Whitecap Dakota are in the black. Bear spoke of plans to build a hotel and a business park. His band even operates a golf course. Bear earns a tidy sum, as do the band’s two elected councillors. “We have been able to generate a lot of our own-source revenues, so we can top up salaries and make sure we can be competitive,” he told the aboriginal affairs committee. Bear said he’s happy to disclose his own salary, and pointed out that he has no say in his own paycheque. “We actually have a chief and council compensation commission in our community that’s made up of our membership,” he says. “They set our salaries; we don’t set our salaries.” Fast forward two years, and now we all know Bear’s salary last year: $129,519, plus $14,860 in benefits. We also know that his two councillors, Frank Royal and Dwayne Eagle, each took home $102,473 (plus benefits)." First Nations transparency: a deeper look at chiefs' earnings (macleans.ca) There are things native bands could do to create profitable businesses in some places if they were only motivated. The Osooyoos band in the Okanogan is one example of a band that apparently has done well. There are other examples. There was a well known native who became a lawyer in B.C. and wrote at least one book. He also taught the martial arts. But he left the reserve and went to Vancouver to get educated. He did well. His book is all about success through self effort. That's what is needed. The left has the wrong idea. There are other examples of native bands that have made a success of themselves too. I think there is a band up in the tar sands in Alberta that has done well too.

That's true. Also, one of the problems is aboriginals claim vast areas as their "traditional territory". In B.C. the various bands claim the whole province as their traditional territory. Of course they claim natural resource development (oil, gas, forest industry) is on "their" land. The actual native reserves are small areas where they live. They don't actually live on the vast wilderness and mountainous areas that cover hundreds and thousands of square kilometres. In the past they were given hunting and fishing privileges because that is what they did historically as hunter-gatherers. But they have never lived in the past on natural resources like oil, natural gas, logging etc. other than using trees for local purposes in a very limited way. Natives do get hired by resource companies to actually work in the industry. This is fair. But what is happening now is the native bands are demanding and possibly receiving some kind of royalties for resource extraction on what they claim as their traditional lands in some cases, which cover the whole province. The Canadian government has already paid billions of dollars per year to support native bands. I believe the government pays for housing, water filtration plants, etc. and monthly support for each native. Plus they have special status cards which they use to be excused from paying certain taxes, etc. The monthly payments goes through band managers and councils I believe and there is little accountability. There have been cases of abuse of the money. Harper passed a law to create transparency and accountability, but the liberals abolished it. "IOGC collects all royalty moneys on behalf of First Nations and transfers the moneys into trust fund accounts that are administered by Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC). First Nations can apply to AANDC regional offices to access their moneys for community projects and other uses. All moneys collected by IOGC on behalf of First Nations are payable to the Receiver General for Canada and must be submitted by cheque. 100% of the funds collected on behalf of First Nations are placed in their trust accounts." Royalty Payments (pgic-iogc.gc.ca)

We are also seeing governments give special resource payoffs to aboriginals. Benefits such as royalties should go to the province which must provide health care and other services for everyone in the province, including natives. I don't think it is right to be paying them special payments that nobody else receives for resource development.

So you don't believe in human rights.

A court just reduced the sentence of a man who killed three mounties in Nova Scotia. They said in effect that 75 years is too long and he will be entitled to apply for parole after 25 years. When one murders other people, I think they forfeit any rights to be free again, but apparently many liberals and judges think otherwise.

Doing what? Who has the right to give aboriginals lands when the millions of people who might be effected had no idea what is going on or any say? No sign that the demands will ever end. Most people believe the demands will never end. The government already paid 3 billion dollars out to residential school survivors. Just signed a deal for another 2.8 billion dollars. We haven't even begun with the unmarked graves which could cost billions. Then there will be endless demands for colonization and settlement. If they are given self-government which is the direction the BC NDP is going, they will want billions to set up their own justice system. What about a separate health care system next? Separate schools and universities? Who do you think is paying for houses, roads, water systems, and infrastructure for FNs. Everything. On and on it goes. White man will be expected to pay for it all if the lefties, liberals, and woke have their way. This is the problem the woke and lefties are creating and going to leave for our grandchildren. If you are part of it, that is what you are doing. Creating a nightmare and destroying the future. This is what UNDRIP is also pushing us into and the liberals are falling for it. People like yourself.

I never suggested a tribe should be given whatever territory they want or claim. I don't suggest "negotiating" and giving FNs what they want. The fact is they claim the whole province. They can't have whatever they want. They are a tiny percentage of the population. They would have to take what they are given if they want to go that route and be self-governing. As a small population, they don't need more than their share of the land. No I wouldn't give them Haida Gwaii. Maybe 10% of it on the west coast Maybe a few small pieces of land on the coast. We would have to give more than one piece of land. Maybe a small percentage of Vancouver Island. But all other tribes and reserves on the island would have to move to that area. You must know they are never satisfied and always want more. They never will be satisfied. It's time to change our approach because the present approach is not working. Continenta Horn, a famous native woman said white man will always be paying. It will never end.

Many FNs, particularly their leaders and red power activists and their leftist supporters are constantly complaining and demanding self-government. You can't solve that and they are only about 4.5% of the population. The rest of us are 95% of population and are tired of listening to it and tired of paying endlessly. This will never end. The majority of Canadians should be able to make that decision. I don't understand what your problem is. Who cares if a new country is not mentioned. They want self-government and independence. There is no other way to give it to them unless you give them a piece of land to have a place where they can be independent and sovereign. You have not given any other solution. Just complain about any suggestion. You either give them their own area or listen to their demands forever and continue to pay billions to them forever. Which is worse? Giving them a piece of land and saying that is your country. Or listening to endless demands and paying forever?

The education system is being destroyed by leftism in Canada. "Teaching is now a political act that involves indoctrinating children instead of educating them, said Chanel Pfahl, in an interview with the National Post. “There’s a lot of reason to be afraid. We are in a kind of cultural revolution and people really do need to pay attention.” Michael Higgins: 'A lot of reason to be afraid,' says censured teacher critical of the woke revolution in classrooms (msn.com)

No likely going to happen. The person has to be someone who would have the allegiance of millions of Canadians including the Armed Forces and RCMP. There is nobody in Canada who would fit that requirement. Only the King or Queen. The GG is only a representative. The King is still the head of state, not the GG.

the U.S. system is Republican, an entirely different system that ours. We have Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy which is very different. It requires a non-political head of state.

Heads of state are supposed to be above politics. That's why we don't elect Kings, Queens, or Governor Generals. How could a head of state be independent from politics or be neutral if they were elected? One of their jobs is to be a referee if a government is tied and can't decide who should be the Prime Minister. Or dissolve a government in certain situations. How is that possible if they are partisan?

The theory of evolution has been well de-bunked. One example is the great fraud of the Piltdown man which had a huge effect on society but years later was found to be a fraud. "On the contrary, Piltdown man was extremely influential in shaping evolutionary thinking and early research on human evolutionary theory. For the four decades before it was exposed, Piltdown man was considered the ‘missing link’. It was used as one of the key evidences against creation in the Scopes trial. It altered the education in the United States for a whole generation and found its way into major science textbooks and encyclopedias—and it was a hoax. There were over 250 publications on Piltdown man alone!1 The implications for evolutionary theory were tremendous. Entire evolutionary-developmental theories about hominid evolution were based on Piltdown and many of those were demolished when the fraud was exposed. 250 publications! It would be nothing short of historical revisionism to downplay its significance." Evolution fraud (creation.com) The theory of evolution or Darwinism is just one of the tools that has been instrumental in destroying our western civilization or Judeo-Christian civilization. If you want to learn more about the history of Christianity watch a long interesting history video on youtube. I just watched it and it also shows how Christianity influence society and history down through the ages. It is 2 hrs 33 mins and made up of about five parts. When one part ends, wait for the next part to start. Don't think it is over. Very interesting and scholarly. History of Christianity (2000) | Full Movie | Dr. Timothy George | Mona Hurlbert Fisher - Bing video

That's the reason I asked should natives who wish to be independent be given a piece of land where they could be self-governing and have their own country with a border? Many native leaders are claiming they want to be self-governing. Since that can't work within Canada and would conflict with Canadian laws and system within Canada's territory, why not give them their own territory and let them have at it. Just one condition. They must pick which country they are going to be a part of: either stay in Canada and obey our laws and quit demanding self-government and self-determination and whatever else OR take out citizenship and stay in their own territory. There would have to be a border and essentially no crossing back and forth except under certain conditions, including a passport and laws governing visiting. Those who wish to remain part of Canada would have to swear allegiance to Canada and agree to the conditions which would include no more demanding special rights and privileges for FNs.

If the news reports that China's interference mainly benefited the Liberals, why should anyone believe anything a Liberal says on the subject? There is good reason the Liberals would downplay the effect on the election outcome? 53% of Canadians say this is a serious threat to democracy. It seems to me the Liberals are automatically in a conflict of interest when they speak on the subject since they are the beneficiaries of the influence. China-linked WeChat accounts spread disinformation in advance of 2021 Canadian election | by @DFRLab | DFRLab | Medium

For those that might be interested in some truth here is a good free movie to do with Evolution versus Creation. A Matter of Faith | Creation vs. Evolution | A Rich Christiano Film - Bing video My hope is that there are some wise men / women out there somewhere that will watch this. If you really want to oppose leftism and resist it from destroying the west, then there is only one direction to go. " 9 Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning. " Proverbs 9:9 KJV

Would look forward to a PP government seriously dismantling or changing the CBC structure entirely to make it more politically neutral and clean out the wokeness. Stop giving taxpayer money to media companies and other liberal favourites. The CTV seems to be mirror image of the CBC. Maybe examine why that is. The Supreme Court needs major changes but I am not sure the government would have much power to do that and make it less liberal and less woke. Killing the carbon tax and stopping the attack on the energy gas and oil industry would be a very positive step and eliminating the plans for forcing Canadians to buy EVs would be helpful. Changes to the system to invigorate home building would be a big improvement. Stop the environmental attacks on Canada and ban foreign money coming in to the environmental movement.

Very true. Your assessment is very accurate. What is amazing is that so many people seem to still believe Canada is a morally, intellectually advanced country, when in fact it is becoming the opposite.

I explained it in previous posts, but you chose to ignore it.

"The Bible is consistent through both Old and New Testaments in confirming that homosexuality is sin. What does the New Testament say about homosexuality? | GotQuestions.org

One news article says this issue could be the one thing that causes the collapse of Trudeau and the Liberals. We will see.

That is nonsensical. God does not command Christians to do such things.

I have already explained some of that. I doubt that anyone could just go out as a vigilante and kill someone at the time of Leviticus was in force. It would only be the leaders of Israel who were in charge and would have to likely follow certain principles of justice to find someone guilty. But the point is which I already explained is that only applied in that period of history because Israel was God's specially chosen people and laid down certain laws for them because they were expected not to be the same as the heathen nations around them (the Canaanites for example). There is nothing to indicate things will change from the way it is now in the world. Leviticus was for the people of Israel who lived 3,500 years ago and that system is not coming back in the present age. We are not part of Israel. We are part of the Gentile nations. The Bible does prophesy that Christ will return anytime and take the believers out of the world and that will be followed by seven years of tribulation in the world and one world government of the anti-Christ. That will be followed by Christ returning and establishing a thousand year millennium reign on earth with the believers. Do you wish to be part of the believers that the Lord will take out of the world any time and live forever with him? That is the important issue.

This is what one person's commentary on the laws in Leviticus says: "Chapter 20 Chapter twenty, now God begins to get a little heavier. In chapter twenty God goes over some of the things He dealt with in chapter eighteen, only in chapter twenty telling that the violators of these things should be put to death. I know a lot of these sob sisters are crying out against capital punishment. But if we practice capital punishment as the Bible says, we wouldn't have near the crime problem that we have today. I don't know what's gone wrong with our judicial system, but we are far more interested in protecting the rights of the criminal than we are of the innocent victims. There's something awfully stupid about our whole system that releases the rapists, and the murderers and all back, and the kidnappers, back on the streets to repeat their crimes over and over again. Something stupid when you can't bring up the past patterns of a man's life for a present crime that he's committed. The man is showing himself to be a habitual child molester, or a habitual rapist and all, then he should be dealt with as a habitual child molester. As far as I'm concerned better to-I'll pull the switch if they need someone. He can ask God to forgive him, and God will forgive him, and he'll go to heaven; he'll be a lot better off. But we'll be a lot better off too, and a lot safer, and our children will be a lot safer walking in the streets. I wouldn't have to worry nearly so much in sending them off to the store. We are living in a crazy, corrupt world that's gone wild. It's because we've forsaken the law of God. We've got a bunch of sob sisters, pantywaists. Romaine could tell you about them better than I could. If a father sacrificed his child to Molech, he was to be put to death. [Don't mess with him.] If he is worshiping the god Molech and in so doing offers his child as a living sacrifice to Molech, kill him, put him to death. Stone him with stones, for I will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among the people. And if you in any wise hide your eyes from him who has sacrificed his children to Molech, and you don't kill him, then God will set his face against you, and against your family, to cut you off, for those that go a-whoring after Molech, from among the people. And if a person seeks after those that have the familiar spirits, and after wizards, to go a-whoring after them, I will set my face against them. Sanctify yourselves therefore, and be ye holy: for I am the Lord your God. And ye shall keep my statutes: I am the Lord which has set you apart. Every one that curses his father or mother shall surely be put to death: [That's heavy.] A man that commits adultery with another man's wife, both of them shall be put to death. A man that lies with his father's wife, those of the incestuous relationships were to be put to death. Homosexuals [verse thirteen] were to be put to death, bestiality a person was to be put to death; both for men and women ( Leviticus 20:2-15 )." Leviticus 20:13 - Verse-by-Verse Bible Commentary - StudyLight.org It is a fact that the criminal justice system is far more interested in protecting the rights of criminals than protecting the victims. Twelve people on the Cree nation were stabbed to death in September by a known dangerous offender let out on parole. A police officer in Ontario was killed by another dangerous offender let out on bail a couple months ago. These are facts nobody can deny.