Jump to content

hot enough

Member
  • Posts

    4,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by hot enough

  1. No, you have fled when the discussions were on topics that any normal person with a modicum of education and thinking can understand. He slipped at least twice, the first time directly addressing most of the MSM, the second in a recent interview, about a month ago. Why aren't you interested in seeing them? Why is there no discussion about this, from you all or from the press? You all know why. If you really thought about it, Michael, you would know that was completely false. Why is this silly meme raised again and again. The Gulf of Tonkin was kept under wraps for what, 30 years? It's still under wraps for most people because the western media doesn't discuss these things like they should.
  2. That's because you flee before you have to face it. Nanothermite is but one of the smoking guns. Highly explosive, incredibly powerful nanothermite, developed by US government military labs found at WTC. Iron microspheres, one of the by products of thermitic reactions found in levels 1500 times normal. Unreacted, that is, not yet exploded particles of nanothermite found in the WTC dust. When "exploded" on a hot strip these particles create the same chemical signature as regular thermite. The difference is that NANOthermite, because of its nano size, is much much more explosive but it is also much easier to handle and set off than regular thermite. Case closed. Nobody has access to this nanothermite except the US government. An absolute conclusion: It is completely impossible that the alleged 911 hijackers caused the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 and 7.
  3. You love speculation, Michael, but you abhor discussing the facts. In fact you have frequently stated how you do not want to discuss the facts. What of George W Bush describing the explosions and bombs going off at WTC on September 11, 2001 after the "planes" hit the towers?
  4. After 41 pages of overwhelming evidence showing that the US is responsible for the collapses of the three towers you still seek to deceive, Betsy. But you are right about one thing, "this topic is about 9/11 terrorism", USA 911 terrorism.
  5. That is much too much a narrow focus, Michael. And you are off topic. As Betsy has been.
  6. More brave Americans bringing freedom and democracy to villagers in Vietnam. Some real fun nostalgia.
  7. Evidently it didn't take much.
  8. Such silliness. From who? Vietnam, Nicaragua, Cuba, Iraq, ... .
  9. We are all hoping that a man with your talents and credentials could do it.
  10. It works for the USA. Witness the over 70 illegal invasions since WWII.
  11. I'm certain that there will be many who will leap to the fore to research and discuss that, given that these folks live in such open, honest societies where wholesome debate is their lifeblood.
  12. You sure went on and on on the very topic that you ranted about being off topic, Rue. At least you limited yourself to a short bible length screed.
  13. And he's an avid supporter of war criminals, terrorists, pedophiles, rapists, I believe even death squads in his home country - that would require more research. Perhaps you will dig into that, James.
  14. George Bush describes the explosions and bombs at WTC on 911. 

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      Maybe he saw it on TV. . . like everyone else. 

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      Saw what on TV, Boges?

  15. That is ludicrous, Michael. It is the most played up, meaning most talked about but it pales compared to the collective genocides of you know who.
  16. You are being deceptive or much worse.
  17. War crimes, vicious war crimes and more vicious war crimes. The American way.
  18. How long will it take before Trump commits his first war crime, his first terrorist act?

    Oops, too late, he has already done that - keeping the terrorism against Cuba going. He hasn't brought home all the CIA terrorists operating in myriad countries around the world. He has kept the Iraq and Afghanistan war crimes in gear. 

    I withdraw my question.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      That is a whole thread in itself, bb. International law, the principles of the Nuremberg War Crimes tribunals established what war crimes were.

      The US tolerated it, in fact the US created it, nurtured it, supported it, paid for it, love it ever since the 1980s.

      Not the "west", the US. And remember, Osama bin Laden wasn't involved in 9-11. Actually no Arabs were. Science says you were all badly scammed, played once again by your governments. When will you ever learn?

    3. bush_cheney2004

      bush_cheney2004

      Radical Islamists never commit "war crimes"...it is not halal.

    4. betsy

      betsy

      yes hot enough.  war crimes being committed by the Talibans. 

        giggle.gif

  19. That's a given! I think most folks would say Hitler was rather goofy. What I meant was how to describe such a large group in one costume. How do you illustrate, Blair, Bush, Cheney, Nixon, ... Reagan, ... in one fell swoop.
  20. What would a halloween costume look like that depicts western war criminals?
  21. It's plain to see that the devil has reached deep into your being, dre. Get thee behind me, [and some other old words to make me sound bright] Satan.
  22. You really have to get up to speed, Argus. And when this great christian wasn't advocating war crimes he was supporting those war crimes in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Nicaragua, Guatemala, ... . When Billy Graham Urged Nixon to Kill a Million People http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/01/when-billy-graham-urged-nixon-to-kill-a-million-people/
  23. The US usually has underlings visit its vicious, right wing brutal dictators at their palaces - it's all about "plausible - which is always ridiculously implausible - deniability".
  24. They are hereby mentioned. And it is further noted just how long and how hard you homophobic, racist christians have hated and lobbied against allowing such people to have a place in society. Dog almighty, such flaming hypocrites!
  25. Your description matches the Bazant et al "scientific paper" that NIST largely relied on for their explanation of the collapse of the TTs. Why wasn't this great scientific body, NIST, able to formulate their own hypothesis and use their great scientific expertise to explain the collapses? The Bazant paper has been refuted by a later paper, which showed that Bazant used fraudulent numbers to justify the silly notion that airplanes and jet fuel fires caused the collapses.
×
×
  • Create New...