hot enough

Then all would see the jolting, halting collapses you can see in ferro/concrete building collapses. Destruction followed by a pause/jolt, just like one sees in a head on collision. What would one expect to see in a head on collision between a 30 mile per hour Volkswagon Beetle and a stationary/parked Semi truck and trailer combination, a SuperB, backed up tight to a loading dock attached to a massive building. Would the Volkswagon keep destroying the SuperB, then the loading dock, then the massive building?

No links to any science to support your lame responses, B_C. As always, nothing. Only desperation. Desperation, however strong, does not equate to science.

Another dead B_C link. Typical. Why do you seek to embarrass yourself so? Why?

That everyone has fled, that there are no people able to point out the "rock solid evidence" for the US official conspiracy theory tells it all. 911 is one huge lie from start to finish and those who so strongly believed are in a state of shock, wondering how they could have believed such utter nonsense. Those would be the mildly honest ones. There are others, who also know that the jig is up, who still express this irrational denial you see here.

Show one time you have ever done this.

No, it doesn't, at all, Altai. Verinage works because there are careful calculations done to ensure that there is actually enough power in the falling portion to destroy the remaining portion. The most important thing to remember and this is CRUCIAL, I cannot emphasize it enough - there are always JOLTS, ie. the upper portions of the structures always slow down, following Newton's Third Law - the twin towers accelerated which goes against Newton's Third Law, which is impossible, which shows everyone that the twin towers were controlled demolitions.

Finally, a tiny measure of honesty. This is illustrative of what you have always done, what you always do, B_C. You never discuss any science, you make a mockery of science, you mock yourself with your fabrications and distortions and you receive support for doing so.

It is not a personal attack. It is a plea for you to seek help.

Completely false! And you would have known this had you watched the video. Very very dishonest, unbelievably dishonest. I suggest that you seek help, right away. Please.

Just a few posts before, this video, which you didn't watch, because you are so dedicated to science, describes the nanothermite found at WTC. 9-11: Military nano thermite unknown to the general public found in the dust https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA-AqM7JNuo

"nanothermite" What is wrong with you that you can so readily deny reality? Are you of the opinion, one of many of your opinions, never with any supporting facts, that you are exhibiting a scientific approach? =============== Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

You have never once been a poster that has proven anything, B_C. All you do is make wild, completely unsupported assertions. Like on your WT and the Interstate Bridge fiasco, your Dwain Deets graphic fiasco, your myriad fiascos.

Explosives don't have to be placed on a lot of floors. The French do Verinage, which uses no explosives, just a hydraulic initiation and then they use the weight of floors to crush other floors.

??????

Yeah right, American "culture" - football, baseball, brain dead car racing, crass nonsensical movies, war and war crimes propaganda, various and sundry filth, sort of like gorging on the culture of Sodom and Gomorrah.

They didn't want to send conservatives into apoplexy. They didn't want to get conservatives' panties in a bigger twist than they are now.

There you go again, Duuuude! Commie duuude!

Try common sense, instead of just repeating right wing talking points, Boges.

A rocket tangent! With a super booster.

And quaaludes and other date rape drugs. Wholesome America!

As is usually the case, without a lick of evidence.

with rum, golden, stirred, not shaken.

That is silly. Not to mention hypocritical. You, a conservative, a big free market guy are suggesting she should do this for free. I am addressing the issue - your stunning hypocrisy.

Why should she? Why are you being such a communist?

Oh, the calamity! Obviously she is. And she stated that very clearly, didn't she? Off you will go on another wild tangent.