Omni

Now there's a feeble attempt at spin if ever I heard one. She is refusing service to people because of her religion.

No I didn't, I heard it in an interview with a USCIS official. But assume what you will. Yes Trump does under the DACA agreement . However he will have changed his mind three times by the time I get back from taking a piss. The rest of your comments is fairly accurate.

It certainly wasn't Harper that's for sure.

How is it inaccurate?

So you're suggesting that all religions, including Christianity should be equally as discriminatory.

Check the gun homicide rates and see who actually failed and get back to us.

We let him sit in Gitmo for 8 years without any representation for one thing. And previous case law suggested he would have walked out of a court case with as much or more than he got from this settlement and of course there would have been the added legal costs.

He certainly did just that when he had his first "listening session" after Lakeland and the next day when he spoke to a room full of conservatives and completely gutted the remarks on gun control he had offered to those affected by the school shooting. The flip flop was ear piercing.

I don't have to knock myself out. That Khadr was set to win his case was a known so the decision to settle out of court of was simply a way to cut costs. Appointments of judges are always political decisions. Now you can knock yourself out showing us it was Trudeau who made the invite.

Ah, if you go back to the start, it's about a Christian baker, and a lesbian couple, and how a judge decided that religion trumped ideology. But I'll leave you to it as I can see where it will go, as usual.

It's also about ideology and wedding cakes, and whether religious dogma should trump legal rights.

I noticed you're in the wrong thread.

Well Betsy I actually have my own version of "faith" but it relies more on science than it does on than a bunch of nonsense that a bunch of men wrote in this book or that book and then said believe what we are telling you or you will burn in hell. That smacks of a form of ignorance but I understand it is in many ways born out of fear, especially of what comes after out time on this earth. One way to make words sound hollow is to simply cut and paste page after page of those men's words that your type have decided to buy into. And then try to stress that they must be true/important by coloring/enlarging text. Sound familiar. If it works for you that's fine, I'll stick with my own.

I suspect congress will block the recent tariffs Trump is babbling about on steel and aluminum. They have the power and the brains to know this would cost the US a lot of jobs.

When I refer to religion I refer to the recognized types. Having a strong opinion on a certain issue is something different. Religion tends to have limited parameters that attempt to control individual focus. That's why I shun it in favor of the freedom to have strong feelings in whatever I have them. All Trudeau did with his "tickbox" on summer funding was to try and make sure various religious beliefs did not interfere with a persons right to a publicly funded summer job.

I'm not really all that interested in discussions about religion since I'm not religious.

And we all saw what that did to the debt.

You're a little behind the times there l'il buddy. I mentioned this to you before but you chose to ignore, Anyway here's a little reading to catch you up. Objective viewers have long ago concluded that Fox News is not, and never has been, a legitimate news network. They began as a project by right-wing propagandist Rupert Murdoch and Republican media strategist Roger Ailes to spread disinformation and promote GOP politicians. And for the past 17 years they have carried out that mission with a roster of rabidly partisan hosts broadcasting provable lies. Now, with the publication of the “Hollywood Reporter’s 35 Most Powerful People in New York Media 2015,” Roger Ailes, the Fox News chairman and CEO, has confessed that his network, despite its name, is not actually in the news business. Belittling his cable news competitors CNN and MSNBC, he gave the Reporter a statement revealing his true professional aspirations: https://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=27363

Well your spelling is correct in this one, but your word interpretation is a little faulty. Racists don't hate their own skin, they hate other peoples skin colors. As was previously pointed out by another member, try doing some research, even the basic stuff before posting.

I don't despise the guy, I try to scan the news landscape (you should try it sometime) but his screed is such BS most of the time that who would waste their time listening to much of it?

You'll need to try a lot harder.

Some of them could be the US congress. But you are correct on one thing, Fox does waste a lot of time. Happily yours, not mine. I tune in once in awhile but 5 minutes of Hannity's blather and any non conspiracy theorist has to flip the channel.

Maybe because we already have enough racists without importing more.

Of course. You'll count of fox and remain totally biased/uninformed. What else is new?

The Boers (another spelling correction for you) brought slavery to the place. Luckily the British were tough enough to kick their asses.