Omni

Nobody really needs an assault rifle down on mainstreet USA. Limiting purchases of other types of weapons who can pass a background check is what I'm OK with.

An AR 15 can hold a 30 round mag and are far more deadly than anything you can stick into a revolver. Perhaps you are not really familiar with firearms.

People in Canada have shotguns for hunting. And yep, once in a while a whacko will get hold of one. You have a lot more guns and a lot more whackos. That's why your gun deaths are about ten times what ours are. But keep trying to deflect. Nobody's really buying.

If you can pass a meaningful background check.

Have a problem with reading comprehension? I posted that no one is wanting to take away all guns. Just the ones that should only be in the hands of the military, and others should be allowed in the hands that can simply show they have not posted facebook posts that they intend to become school shooters. What do you not get about that?

Yes, taking away guns, that nobody on the street should have had in the first place. Maaaaaaybe then, the US could start to rein in it's out of control lack of gun control. Or would you just like to sit back and let the ongoing violence continue. BC04 is in complete concert with you if that's where you are so you have a friend there.

Yep. Why does the man in the street need an Assault Rifle?

Typical over reaction from the gun lobby. Nobody is saying they want to take everybody's guns away. That's just LaPiere bullshit. But if American's hide under their beds with their heads up their arses, the next round of school shooting will proceed as per the previous.

You have heard of background checks have you?

I am quite willing to intervene into constitutional rights such that crazy people shouldn't have easy access to guns so they can kill their fellow students they have an issue with.

Stirring a few cells to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is a little different than firing a slug into a high school student.

But you are getting there rapidly.

Are you unaware of what the gun was designed for. Hint: it wasn't so you could go into the woods to get a rabbit for your supper.

Technically that is correct, but that would be tactic Dana types would use to hide the other "A" word pertaining to the weapon.

I am not, and neither are many of the people who are responding to the Parkland shooting. but they are talking about tightening up the laws for owning such crazy deadly weapons as the AR 15. You are aware of what the "A" stands for I suppose. Most states you don't even need a background check. Cruz bought his legally without one. Up to the Lakeland shooting there was one somewhere in the US on an average of every 2.5 days. People are getting a bit fed up finally. If you're taking your lead from Dana Loesch then I can only roll my eyes. Her ridiculous comments in her speech at CPAC made me want to shoot her.

Yep, you're just fiddling numbers now. The fact is you have a better chance of being shot to death in the US than you do of dyeing in a car accident in Canada. And your "head in the sand" approach that gun laws won't bring down gun violence has been totally refuted by what happened in Australia.

It will be interesting to see how much of the dirty laundry Gates will have to reveal in his plea deal.

Yep, we have a lot of guns up here in Canada. How come you guys are using them so often to shoot each other?

How do you propose to take it out when it actually exists? I'll get the popcorn.

I guess you have to strive for some comfort any way you can.

In the latest ridiculously embarrassing comment, Trump refers to immigrants as "snakes", Perhaps the dolt forgot he is married to one. No wonder she oftern looks so troubled when she has to appear in public with him.

I guess you are groping for whatever you think will take the focus off Trump's endless turmoil. He's trying to hide his bald spot though, that should inspire you.

Oh yeah we can see you are doing very well. https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/americas/us-gun-statistics/index.html

Too bad Trump Jr. is likely about to be indicted.

and what could be more convincing I wonder?