Omni

Them make sure you cast your ballot next election. Attaboy.

Trump will get himself ousted from his office. He has already committed a number of impeachable offenses. It won't take anywhere close to 4 years.

Right then, let's kick out all the politicians from whatever party, and let anarchy reign. Brilliant idea. Apparently you've never travelled far away enough to actually experience it. Otherwise you would appreciate our form of government, even if it's not perfect.

Anybody who does that many "on and on's" shows their dumbocracy. I bet Trump will tweet out something even stupider tomorrow. Any bets?

No, it's based on the intent of the perp.

And maybe some long necked geese? I appreciate you like fairy tales.

No I'm afraid not. It's based on the nature of the perpetrator.

Based on the nature of the crime. Why is that hard to understand?

Trump can't even seem to arrange a photo op. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/11/donald-trump-meeting-russia-sergei-lavrov-photos What happens if there is some sort of a national crisis like a flood or an earthquake etc?

I know, just keep trying.

So you don't agree with punitive measures?

Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and wants a good laugh at the end of the week. Gawd bless Melissa. http://jezebel.com/melissa-mccarthy-was-zooming-around-midtown-as-sean-spi-1795169622

Apparently you don't fully understand what obstruction of justice entails. Law is complicated no doubt.

I'm afraid you'll have to live with it even though you don't understand it.

Your response is rather simple minded. A POTUS asking this type of question to the director of the FBI is a little different than your run of the mill question.

And Trump seems to be throwing out yet another "fart" about every 24 hours. It's very entertaining watching it from Canada.

Maybe you should listen to legal minds. But maybe you prefer Unicorns.

Obviously the purpose is to try to achieve more protection. As is a life sentence for murder, for instance. So according to your reasoning, because severe sentences don't necessarily stop people from murdering, we should just excuse them and maybe give them a stern warning.

Because it's to be more punishment.

A crime could have very well have been committed. As well as there could have been with the threat to Comey. It comes under the heading of obstruction of justice.

I see you don't really understand the term "third world"

What makes you think they don't already provide those stats?

I think in many cases that's true. I recall reading way back when that an electrical technician in charge of installing one of the first electric chairs in some US state prison, ended up dying in that same chair for murder some time later. If anybody knew what could be in store for him for pulling that trigger, it would have been him.

Hate speech and hate crimes are two different things. I could say I don't like Jews or Muslims or Christians as long as I don't seek to bring harm to them. If I go out and beat someone up because they are a Jew, and that can be shown, I may receive a harsher sentence than if I just beat them up. Both are assault, one could have the addition of a hate crime.

Well it's not less protection, I've already pointed that out, but you seem to want to continue to claim it is, so carry on.