Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    117

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. The CPC is in trouble because the alt-left media lies, omits, covers and smears at will and the sheeple are willing accomplices. As long as liberals here allow the lying to continue "becuz thayre on my side" the socialists will keep accumulating control until elections are just for show.
  2. https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/oic/oic_cur/0627_2021
  3. From an honest point of view, yes. But from their point of view it's "mission accomplished - we programmed some more BLM/Antifa drones."
  4. I think it's too bad that this guy is going to pull CNN's fat out of the fire. They really deserved to crash and burn. Now all they'll do is pull back from "super-tard lying leftists" to "overly left with a few key well-placed and omissions".
  5. Are the tests even accurate now? I don't follow it that closely because I don't really care, but I was under the impression that false positives were not uncommon.
  6. I didn't see that. Where did you see it? I saw "the costs and restrictions continue indefinitely", and that was actually 100% the case when the OP was written. If you read the article that he cited, it was about the fact that Chrystia Freeland wouldn't give a timeline for removing the test. FYI that means that it was going to go on for an unspecified period of time - aka 'indefinitely'. Unless I missed another quote of his somewhere else, you just tried to correct him but you were actually wrong in doing so. Here you are, pretending to be a social justice warrior, yet you're advocating for travel restrictions based upon one's economic status. That's some Nancy-Pelosi level social justice speak right there: "Make all of the peons equal, but in a much lower class."
  7. But, but, but.... the vaccine works, dammit! It's impossible for the dbl-vaxxed to carry covid! And even if they did carry it, they can't get sick with it, so what's the harm? Are we worried about killing the mouth-breathers who didn't get the vaccine yet? You do know that they're all just white supremacist terrorists anyways, right? Even the black ones: we call them "Uncle Toms" because we're anti-racism. /leftbabble
  8. Horrible? They did a horrible job of covering this story if they were trying to do it accurately; however, their goal is divide the country along racial/political lines, so they actually did an excellent job of twisting their coverage of the incident to suit their divisive, evil narrative. MSNBC's viewers are being programmed to see it thusly: "Rittenhouse is a violent white supremacist who hated social justice demonstrations, so he went on a white privilege hunting trip to murder some black anti-racism activists. He shot 3 such heroes with the white supremacists' gun of choice while they were dutifully lighting freedom fires and liberating the ill-gotten gains of white slave-owners. Rittenhouse will probably get away with it because there are millions of white supremacists (aka conservatives) in places of power all across the country who swore Trumpian oaths to ensure that white privilege remains intact." If that's not Joy Reid's take on every story that she prattles on about then I don't speak English.
  9. The Steele dossier wasn't 'tarnished', it was absolute bunk, which Hillary paid a British spy to get from a Russian. That's your Russian collusion story right there, plain as day. The FBI presented it to a FISA court judge as 'partially verified and corroborated' evidence when that was known to be a lie (Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to that - he was their fall guy) and they actually knew that the person who created the info in the first place was the same person who leaked the false info to the media (that's the false corroboration, fyi). The Dossier was the only 'solid' evidence that they presented to the FISA court to get warrants to spy, and they used it 4 times when they knew it was all fake. This wasn't a case of 'show me the crime and I'll find the man', it was a case of 'show me the man and we'll find the crime' - classic KGB stuff, and the FBI is based on the KGB's tactics. Aside from the dossier, and the lying by the FBI lawyer and Hillary's lackey at Perkins Coie to get warrants to spy on Americans who were actually American spies, there was nothing to Russian collusion at all. Every week when Adam Schiff trotted out to tell Americans that "a Russian collusion bombshell is coming this weekend" it was just another lie to string little lib turds along. At the very end, after hundreds of weeks of pending bombshells, nothing landed. The FBI had no evidence of collusion at all after 4 years of smearing the president. That's their own words. "No evidence of collusion." They can say that they had a hunch, and you can believe them, they can hold their breath and stomp their feet and refuse to say that their report exonerated Trump, but they also pleaded G U I L T Y to committing crimes to push what they knew to be a false narrative. You're the last person on earth who doesn't know that it was all a farce. Based on the content of your posts it only stands to reason that your math sucks, but FWIW I have between 3-4 posts on here per day, same as you. Buuuuut... I can understand how you feel like I prove you wrong 50x a day. Makes sense.
  10. Good point. This one probably trumps the two reasons that I was thinking about. I think it would be awesome to see Biden get sued over this. He said it on twitter, so his speech wasn't protected in any way.
  11. If Don Lemon and Joy Reid don't make any racist comments today then you know for certain that something's up.
  12. I watched about 15 minutes of CNN today (11:45-12:00 Pacific time) after the acquittal of Rittenhouse, I was shocked to see that they had actual, honest legal experts come on there and talk about the case. They all discussed the facts of the case and why the jury arrived at the not-guilty verdicts, they didn't insinuate that whiteness had anything to do with it; in fact, there was no racial divisiveness at all unless it was some ultra-coded dog-whistling that I didn't notice. It was kind of surreal. I'm not sure what they're up to but I have a few guesses: 1) Maybe their ratings have fallen so low that they realized that they need to start telling the truth before they're all out of work 2) Most likely, the Dems instructed them not to spark riots over this case while they're busy crucifying the Jan 6th crowd. It's bad optics to let more violent leftist militia members burn/loot buildings & assault cops without being charged while they're busy sending other people to jail for years at a time for far less. At their very worst, CNN legitimized the feelings of [the skateboard guy]'s parents, who claimed that they didn't get any justice for their kid's 'murder', and they called the rioting 'racial justice demonstrations' without mentioning that the leftist media's biased, inaccurate and inflammatory reporting was the actual cause of the riots (as usual). I honestly feel for the guy's parents, but their violent reprobate son was at a riot, looking like he was trying to kill someone. Of course they don't want to see his actions for what they were, I'd never want to think of my son that way either, but the jury's verdict was accurate. It's just another case of leftists being dumfounded when their violent attacks on other people resulted in pushback. Honestly, I was getting a real kick out of ridiculing the MSM for their dishonesty and I don't like that they're putting on a show here. I smell a rat.
  13. Honestly, the stupidity of leftists never ceases to amaze me. "We can't burn coal here now, it's too bad for global warming. In order to save the planet we have to ship that coal to China to burn it." "Extracting Alberta oil does too much damage to the environment. The area is only 700 times cleaner now than it was when the oil sands started being developed. We need to bring supertankers to Canada from ethically challenged countries like Saudi Arabia to be environmentally and socially responsible!"
  14. That sounds really hard to believe, considering how many coal-fired plants they currently have and how many they're planning to build. Coal currently produces over 55% of China's electricity. How much new electricity are they going to produce if coal is only going to be 38% of it? And that number is set to go up, not down: https://time.com/6090732/china-coal-power-plants-emissions/ If China isn't shutting down any existing plants while they're building the new ones, they could have as many as 1,125 coal-fired plants. Would that really just be 38% of their total power? In any event, 1,100+ coal-fired plants is a lot. Alberta had 4 or 5 and they 'had to' shut them down to save the environment. It's not killing the coal mining though, they're still working because....... that coal is getting shipped all the way to China to be burned now. SAVING THE ENVIRONMENT!!!! ?
  15. Did you see where your post above where you cited an article from May in an attempt to disprove information that was far more recent? Yeah, that's where we still are with this one. Also, you still have some explaining to do for lies that you propagated in the Russian collusion threads. Are you ever going to venture over there?
  16. "Hey corn pop, whach yor mouth. snow storms are notorious for causing fires. wares the tress in ant, antuhhh... you know, the cold place below Austria and New Z-land? if you dont beleve me? There's no trees there cuzza all the snowstorm fires. Greta told me about that. she's an expert on everthing. she basically runs this place with her twitty feed. We gotta save the penguins from forist fires!" - Jo biDin.
  17. Boom. Nailed it back on Dec 14th 2016. Nice.
  18. Right. But that statement said that they played both sides from the middle and they never said that there was evidence that Trump asked Russia for help.
  19. You're conflating topics. CIA says that Russia interfered: they put out attack ads against both candidates to sow discord. CNN twists that into: Russia put out ads that exclusively favoured Trump, at Trump's behest. Trump says that he didn't ask the Russians for sweet FA, and Trump absolutely does know whether or not he asked Russia for help. It's incredibly stupid to think that he didn't.
  20. What a joke. I really want to know where you get the bulk of your information from, just for shits and giggles.
  21. Islamic state just called. Just kidding. They're dead. An example of "making things worse" was Biden caving in Afghanistan. Do you miss Trump yet?
  22. With the benefit of hindsight, we all know that Trump's war on islamic state was incredibly successful. By contrast, Biden dropped one bomb and he killed an entire family plus a foreign aid worker. Anything that you'd like to add? Do you feel like your post was accurate and insightful, or did you get stooged?
  23. Busted for spreading total bullshit. Do you have a comment? Do you feel like your news sources are bogus, or that the FBI/CIA are political pawns? These weren't small accusations that you made. It's really pathetic if you can't own up at all.
  24. And just like that, the last leftist has finally realized that it's time to completely abandon the Russian collusion farce and move on to the next set of lies. Not a single one of those god-damned losers apologized or admitted that they were sucked in.
  25. This thread is a great/important read now with the benefit of hindsight. Everyone who considers CNN and CTV to be 'legitimate news sources' should look through their old posts now and take stock of just how wrong they were. Then go back and watch some old Hannity reruns, lo and behold you'll see that there actually was some accurate reporting on Russian collusion from all those years ago. Who knew?
×
×
  • Create New...