WestCanMan

Your bigotry is quoted at the top, the definition of bigotry is shown below, and they're a perfect match. Your comments display blatant bigotry, therefor you are a bigot. This isn't a discussion or a debate, your post was a textbook case of bigotry.

You need to use direct quotes, because what you're doing is being conveniently inaccurate enough to lie and trying to get away with it. I already had to explain to one of you guys (you or Beave) the magnitude of the difference between the idiom "march on the capitol" and the words "let's walk to the capitol". Your accusation, without a direct quote, or a cite, is worthless. In a world where accuracy matters, your comment was pedestrian/stupid.

You made a bigoted comment, I quoted it, you're proven to be a bigot. Now you're making a serious and unsubstantiated accusation which I know that you can't back up, so you're proven to be a liar.

He was actually speaking about anti-vaxxers when he made the comment about misogynists & racists.

Liar. So? Sometimes people are chopped up with machetes. Sometimes they're intentionally starved and frozen to death. Sometimes they're publicly shot. Sometimes they're publicly hung. Sometimes they have their heads chopped off. Children are included in those massacres. Do you really care if rail cars were involved? One could argue that a gas chamber is a more humane death than machete hacking. Does that make it any better? The whole point is that the main objective of a conversation about genocides should be "recognizing the signs of an impending genocide" and not "one genocide was carried out in an industrial manner". It's "remembered" as "the genocide". That's incorrect. It should be "remembered" as "a genocide". It's a sensitive topic. Instead of trying to drum up controversy you should be trying to understand. If you had and an honest correction or a distinction to make that would be one thing, but you're just trying to be difficult. It's disconcerting.

No, my post was a counter to your post, and it ended with actual proof of your bigotry. Sadly for you, even if you edit your own comment, it remains unchanged by the quote feature here, so the record of your bigotry won't just go away.

OMG spare me the hyperbole/stupidity. What a joke. Blah, blah, blah. I don't even know where you get that level of stupidity from. No one else says stupid shit like that aside from you. You are blueanon personified. Nothing in your earlier post 'stands' aside from the fact that you showed how much of a bigot you are. I said that you were a bigot, and I quoted the part of your post where you made a bigoted comment. That stands as a statement of fact of fact, regardless of whether or not you understand your own bigotry.

You're lying. Calling for people to walk to the Capitol is not the same as cheering on rioting after it started. If you don't know that you were lying then you're just extremely stupid.

Your question doesn't elaborate a need for clarification on my part, it just exposes your inability to comprehend what you're reading, so yes I do have an answer but no, I don't really need to give it. Everyone else understands it implicitly, but for your edification, here goes. The Holocaust isn't 'remembered' as a genocide among many, which is what it was. It's talked about as if it was 'the' genocide and nothing else compares. That's dangerous, as it gives a sense of rarity to the topic which couldn't possibly be more wrong. In the 20th century there were a lot of genocides where 1M or more people were killed. It's actually a very broad topic, but in Canada we just focus on the one genocide, and the one group of people affected by it. There's a lead-up to genocide that's very common. People try to get the momentum going quite often but it usually fizzles, and we tend to ignore that lead-up. The UN ignores it. Trudeau ignores it. Our own PM was a genocide denier as recently as 2017. Watch Hotel Rwanda some time, I'm pretty sure that it's still on Netflix. Our own Canadian General, Romeo Dallaire, tried to stop a genocide in Rwanda and the UN literally tied his hands. If you can read, he even wrote a book called "Shake Hands With The Devil" which obviously goes into more detail. People could see that genocide coming ahead of time, our western governments poo-pooed it, the UN ordered troops to stand down so that it was allowed to happen, and it was bizarrely unnecessary or even approved. We shouldn't discuss the holocaust like it was a one-off. It's like calling the Viet Nam war: "the war". We should spend more time talking about what the preamble to a genocide looks like and less time talking about what specifically happened to those people.

It's all one subject dude. A riot is a riot is a riot. A federal building in Oregon and a federal building in Washington State and a federal building in Washington DC are all federal buildings. You need to look up 'coup' now ffs. If you think that 150 unarmed people could stage a coup in the US you're the dumbest person in the history of the internet. Actually, going back before the invention of the wheel. First off, you don't "explain things" to people, you just say stupid things which need to be corrected. Second, Hillary absolutely did cheat, you just have ultra-low standards. Third, Trump was accused of cheating by people who were actually cheating when they made those accusations, and when they lied to the FISA court to get warrants, and when they perpetuated their fraud on the American people. They sucked a lot of people in, and at the beginning some of the people who were duped weren't altogether stupid. However, there's still a small group of low-IQ extremists who are still clinging to the collusion debacle. And now you're just a bigot. No need to go any further here.

CTV and CNN anchors try not to tell lies themselves, they prefer to get guest speakers on to lie and say stupid things and, depending on how blatantly stupid/dishonest they are, they will either ignore their comments to let them stand unchallenged or they'll actively try to give them credibility. An example is the Brionna Taylor case in the US. CNN anchors wouldn't actually say that Brionna was shot in her bed because it's a lie which is easily disproven, but they have guest speakers come on and say things like "Brionna was shot in her bed" or "Brionna was shot for sleeping black" and they just let those comments simmer. The bulk of their idiot horde is none the wiser, they just go out and riot like good little peons. The government isn't being overthrown here, that's just leftist hyperbole which only the dumbest among us will fall for. CTV knows how powerful of a statement this actually is, and they understand that if they can twist it into a January 6th incident, it can actually help the PM's popularity instead of harming him. That's why they're using big words like sedition that their dolt horde doesn't understand.

No they don't. It's just a small, vocal minority. The average Canadian isn't that stupid. That's hate speech blackbird. You should be ashamed of yourself. You actually took our PM's lowest, stupidest words and made them your own. Disgusting.

He actually is, he just has the world's largest PR conglomerate in CTV/CBC/Global news. FYI bigotry is when you falsely ascribe negative character traits to a group of people, and that's exactly what Trudeau did. Not only did he slander a whole group of people, he had a call to action in his message: he suggested that said group shouldn't be 'tolerated'. Take his words, switch up the group name that he used, and see if you can suddenly spot the bigotry. "Jews are very often misogynists and racists. What we have to ask ourselves, as a leader and a country, is "Should we tolerate them?"" "Muslims are very often misogynists and racists. What we have to ask ourselves, as a leader and a country, is "Should we tolerate them?"" "Blacks are very often misogynists and racists. What we have to ask ourselves, as a leader and a country, is "Should we tolerate them?"" "Vaccinated people are very often misogynists and racists. What we have to ask ourselves, as a leader and a country, is "Should we tolerate them?"" "The Chinese are very often misogynists and racists. What we have to ask ourselves, as a leader and a country, is "Should we tolerate them?"" Do you get it Qm? He belched out vile bigotry, plain and simple ( if the translation was accurate). Only bigots usually do that. Didn't you used to be a cop? Shouldn't you be more informed and honest about what constitutes hate speech? What wonderful cities did you live in where the police were defending hate speech?

OMG, that was just as stupid as your other post, with an even lower word count. You're being extra thrifty today. Do you have carpal tunnel syndrome or something?

Fox is far better than the others. You are obviously speaking from ignorance or you'd know that. Maybe Fox would like to be able to lie as much as the others and they just can't because there's so much more scrutiny on them, or maybe it's because their own viewers have so much more integrity than the cellar dwellers who watch CNN/CTV etc, but it is what it is Aristedes. They're just better. You could take advantage of having an actual news source to watch instead of continually getting sucked into saying stupid things that you saw on your propaganda outlet of choice.

No one cheered on the Capitol Hill riot. No one said that the riots should keep happening until after Christmas. No one suggested that the people who committed crimes shouldn't be punished. High ranking members of the GOP didn't set up a bail fund. There was no GOP district attorney saying "we can't put these people in jail because of covid". No one called the riot a "mostly peaceful protest" aside from when they did it in jest, to point out Dem hypocrisy. On the bright side, you managed to pack a massive amount of stupidity into a very small word count there. You could run for office in California or the GTA.

? I sense that you're a mod on some goofball site somewhere that you have the power to control the dialogue. Too bad kid, on this site you're just a noob who gets dummied a lot. Yeah, I agree, your schedule for reading/writing stupidity is full. Keep guessing why everyone who's smarter than you isn't vaxing their kids.

I use stats and facts to prove that your posts are stupid, you come back with sandbox insults. I think we're done here.

That's what I originally thought about CNN, back when they were putting out incendiary lies to keep the Michael Brown riots going, but after the rioting went away and the lying continued unabated I had to consider other reasons. Sadly I've come to the conclusion that news organizations are affiliated with political parties and their coverage of daily events isn't centred around truth, information or accuracy at all, it's about supporting the political narratives of their chosen party. Believe it or not, people are happier being lied to than they are to find out that the other party was right about something. Depending on what news station you watch the Suleimani drone strike was either a brilliant success or patricide. The Afghan withdrawal was a debacle or a stroke of military brilliance. Profits are the same regardless of which side a news corp takes because the stories are compelling enough either way. Riots are compelling. Whether they're awesome or criminal depends on your political stripe. At least they are if you're a leftist. If you're a conservative, riots are always bad.

You may have to admit that your a liar, based on several of your comments from jbander's covid thread from this very day.

1) I don't believe "your" climate science and I don't listen to people who fly to Europe in private jets and then bitch about my 7l/100km car. 2) I'm not arguing the "science" of the mRNA shots at all. I didn't even listen to Joe Rogan's podcast when he talked to the mRNA vaccine pioneer's criticism of the shots. I don't need to. Stats are the final arbiter of the 'vaccine' efficacy debate, period, and the stats are in. Vaccinated people die, a lot. A lot of young people get myocarditis from the vaccines. I know 2 people who got myocarditis and another that was temporarily paralyzed (J&J). The J&J was pimped as being safe too, remember. That's a lie. I stated exactly how much help the mRNA shot was against the various strains that we've seen so far and in not one instance did I say that they made "no difference". If you feel like you have to lie to make a point then maybe don't try to make that point. Say something else. There's a wide open lane for you to make a reasonable case for vaccinating children and you dodge it like it's an anaconda hanging from a tree. Why MH? You believe in it really strongly, so make the case for vaccinating children then instead of just lying about what I said. Because it's a double-edged sword. You like to act like all the vaxes do is provide somewhere between a bit and a lot of protection, and you absolutely ignore the side-effects, which is a form of lying. The young people who are still on heart medication, and whose lives have been limited severely, don't have the luxury of ignoring the side effects, do they? Bullshit, you're lying again. The mRNA shots absolutely do have serious side-effects and it's not a secret. Also, people absolutely do die after being fully vaxed, and there are over 1,000 of them in Canada now. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1257040/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-vaccination-status/ It's actually over 1,500 now, and that number was only about 980 on Dec 20th. Fully-protected people are dying a lot now. You lied. You lied again. Your insistence on burying your head in the sand won't end well for you. Maybe, if, as a people, we weren't satisfied with a pseudo-vax that has deadly side-effects, there would be more pressure on vax companies to make a safe vaccine that actually worked. We showed a dangerous willingness to accept a pseudo-vax with a waiver and maybe we just set a deadly precedent that will fuck us all in the future. Just imagine when, just as MH wants it to be, literally everyone rushes out and signs a waiver to take a rushed vaccine, and it's actually got very serious long-term effects. Is it really good to put all of our eggs in one basket MH?

I'll stop you right there, I made that claim because it was reasonable and accurate. You if-dog-rabbit comment was a mix of fantasy and intentional bullshit. I never tried to make the case that the jabs are detrimental at all, so don't put words in my mouth. My communications aren't slanted either, you just don't recognize honesty when you see it anymore because you're only accustomed to seeing bullshit. The sad fact is that people who take the covid jabs still die, a lot, and you can't even deny that. You won't try to make an actual case. You just lie and smear. I am telling the truth because the truth is important. Vaccines are extremely important. There just isn't a 'covid vaccine' yet. I resent your bigotry and lies, yes, 100%. Rest assured that I'm not going to give my child a shot which is 100% known to have some very dangerous side effects just in hopes that it lessens the chances of some octogenarian in your family from getting covid. If the jab was even safe, that would be one thing, but it's absolutely not safe and I know 3 young people who suffered greatly from vaxing. I don't need to know a 4th. You and your family can literally go to hell for all I care - I don't take medicine to suit your misinformed fancies.

Of course they have the same issues. The hope is that they aren't as biased as our own media is when they cover Canadian stories because they don't have a vested interest in our political parties. Xinhua, Tass, NoKo News, Al Jazeera, BBC, CNN, etc are all as bad as our own news networks.

Using the term "anti-vaxxer" is the exact opposite of 'level-headed' and 'non-partisan'. Anti-vaxxer applies to people who refuse to vaccinate their children, using vaccines that have been proven to be safe after millions of doses over several decades, and which give as much as 100% immunity to diseases which are still around and could still gravely injure them or even kill them. Being an anti-vaxxer is to be a denier of proven science. That terminology doesn't apply in this instance at all, any more than the terms racist and misogynist apply here. To use the word anti-vaxer is to be a bigot, of course using the other words is plainly retarded. This covid shot doesn't stop people from dying and it doesn't stop them from passing on the disease. Period. All that it is known to do is to greatly lessen the severity of the disease among people who got the original variant, to somewhat lessen the severity of the disease among people who got the delta variant, and to negligibly lessen the severity of the disease among people who get the omicron variant. And there are extremely serious, well-documented side effects of the vaccines. I've still yet to see a single person anywhere, at any time, on TV or in person, make even a mildly compelling case for vaccinating children. When people talk about vaccinating kids they use innuendo about how dangerous covid might be to them, and they imply that taking the drug is safer than not taking the drug (they never attempt to quantify that), and they completely ignore the cases of myocarditis and the fact that there could be long-term side effects which were not even aware of yet. Can you direct me to a site or an article that makes a reasonable case for vaccinating children, while taking into account paediatric covid stats and myocarditis stats? Do you have a stat that says that more than 27 kids have died of covid in Canada since the beginning of time?.

What do you call a person who insists that Trump's covid shot is a vaccine? What do you call a person who insists that the covid shot is necessary to save the lives of children? What do you call a person who has made declarative statements about covid every day for the past two years and still only has a rudimentary understanding of all the main talking points? What do you call a person who insists that the covid shot is perfectly safe? What do you call an octogenarian who insists that children should take a chance with the vaccine just on the off chance that it helps prevent them from getting covid? FYI your best chance to avoid covid is to think before you vote for people like Cuomo, Pelosi, DeBlasio, Trudeau etc who do literally everything wrong regarding covid. Pelosi: "Hug covid out!" DeBlasio: "Riding the subway like normal is the best thing to do!" Cuomo: "Throw covid-positive people back into the raisin ranch!" Trudeau: "Let infected people fly to Canada and walk around freely until we're saturated with covid, then force Canadians to get vaccine passports!" You'd think that by now, with the benefit of hindsight, leftists would enough to keep their mouths shut and make us all guess how stupid they are, but nope. Still yakkin'. Still exposing their abject stupidity. They literally never learn.