WestCanMan

That's all bullshit. Brionna rented a car the year before that turned up with a dead body in the trunk. She was involved with her ex as a drug dealer. Packages for him were still arriving at her house. They did identify themselves as police, her boyfriend at the time - the guy that shot one of them to start the gunfight - admitted that he thought that it was her ex pretending to be a cop when they knocked and said they were police. You don't know SFA after all this time because you're addicted to fake news sources, but don't let that stop you from running your mouth. The MSM gobbled up Smollett's story and made it national news, despite the fact that it was the dumbest story ever. He got to cry on national TV and make his stupid accusations. Uh-huh. The entire MSM ran with the story of Sandman being a smug, racist punk because he had his smiling face right above the drum of a First Nations man who was banging on it while singing. Turns out, Sandman was standing still while the guy walked up on him and beat the drum in his face. He was just a 17-yr-old kid attending a pro-life rally. Not a smug racist. Hillary's lawyer was still guilty of providing false evidence to the FBI (the Alfa Bank disinformation), he just didn't get charged with that. He was only charged with "failing to disclose to the FBI that he was working for Hillary when he brought them that disinformation." The reason that he wasn't found guilty is that he didn't really need to disclose it to the FBI - they already knew he was Hillary's boi because they all hung out together at the Perkins Coie office together (The Dems, FBI and Perkins Coie lawyers had a room at that law office to coordinate their witch hunts). Thanks for proving just how sucked in you are by MSM bullshit.

I think that makes them the most peaceful group of Americans, by far.

Now the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell's trial was held under secrecy makes a lot more sense. Now the fact that he appointed a soft-on-pedophilia SCJ makes a lot more sense. "Get those ridiculous laws off of the books, Kitanji! It's time to party!"

Eyes closed, mouth on mouth, that's not a peck. That kid grew up thinking that kissing creepy Joe on the lips was normal. Look at him kissing the little boy on the mouth. It's not even consensual (as if a minor could even give proper legal consent), he's holding the kid's face. The girl that's right there is staring away blankly. If you look at the smooch, and everyone else's reaction, it's a distrbing picture. It's just a fact that Joe does things which decent people consider inappropriate and disgusting. Now there's some reason to believe he does things that might even be illegal.

He provided video of the FBI raid, and interviewed one of the people whose residence was raided, and the he talked to the people who saw the book and reported on its content. The NYT already verified the diary long ago, so leftists can't act like it's fake. So you just lied again and refused to discuss the facts. You're a good little leftist Aristedes. A true sheeple.

@Aristides Do you have any comments to make? Do you understand now that Tucker Carlson was totally on point? You're here chiming in with accusations of dishonest reporting, but now tat you know the reporting was factual, do you have an apology to extend? Can you man up? What do you think about the subject matter? You haven't addressed it directly. Are you unable?

I can't wait for a protest outside of Sotomayor's house, just to see how drastically all of the leftist hypocrites change their tune. "IT'S AN INSURRECTION! HER LIFE IS IN DANGER!"

"I just wish someone would kiss me the way that Biden makes out with his granddaughter" lol.

The NYT has their own theory about how Ashley Biden's diary wound up in the hands of Project Veritas, but I can't get past their paywall because I'm not dumb enough to buy shit. Their reaction to the story is all about "WHY DID SOMEONE HAVE HER DIARY" and they don't care about its content. it's a fact that her diary got out there, and it's not new either. Tucker just waited a long time to report on it. The FBI absolutely raided two locations to try to get it, at least one was a private residence but I think the other may have been an office. The fact that the FBI conducted raids to get the diary back is not up for debate either. I looked online and I saw what are allegedly pictures of her diary entries, and I didn't see where they were refuted. You can find them online for yourself if you look. All that's really in question is how accurate HER OWN, UNSOLICITED WORDS are. She doesn't explicitly say what he did, just that she had showers with him that she feels were inappropriate. That's it. That's the only part of the story which requires any real consideration. What does she feel happened to her. Everything else is fact. Like I said, it was on Tucker Carlson, so book it. It's not some CNN bullshit which should be dismissed out of hand.

This meme has 3 different pictures of creepy Joe kissing his granddaughter on the mouth. I think we all have younger family members by now, daughters or nieces or granddaughters, and I wonder how many of us have ever kissed any of them on the lips... I hope that number is zero, but maybe someone has done it, and they could tell us what culture that's acceptable in? Did anyone here ever kiss any babies on the lips? I think we'd all agree that's inappropriate and I'll assume the answer is zero, so when would it be appropriate to start? 3? Ewww. 6? If you're not already doing it by 6, which is weird, it would be weird to start. How would you make a 6 yr old feel like it was ok to kiss you on the lips if they had never done it before. The older they get, the weirder it is to start. 12? Fuckin gross. If my grandma tried to kiss me on the lips when I was 12 I woulda puked. 14? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. So, my guess is that if he's kissing her on the lips now, he was kissing her on the lips long before she was old enough to have any idea of what kisses on the lips actually mean to an adult male. But he fuckin well knew. Would you let your baby, your 2-yr-old, your 4 yr old daughter be babysat by an uncle or grandfather that kissed them on the lips the way that Biden kisses his granddaughter? I'd punch that mofo in the face if he kissed my pre-school daughter on the lips like that. He's a sick bastard. Kissing people on the lips is not a dispassionate act. It's not an act of paternal love. Is there anyone here who feels like kissing pre-school children on the lips is an act of paternal love?

Stop trying to not believe something just because you don't like it. I'm not a member of the sheeple, so I'm not going to overstate the level of certainty here, and the one thing that I don't want to vouch for in this story is "what are the exact words in her diary and what is their intended meaning?" I said apparently and I don't want to hang any more credibility on that aspect of this story than 'apparently'. I'm almost 100% certain that there's a diary that belongs to Biden's daughter that ended up in the hands of Project Veritas and the Daily News, and that the people at The Daily News feel like the diary indicates that Joe had showers with her when she was young which she feels were inappropriate, but the buck stops there for now. I expect heartfelt, passionate denials will be coming shortly, replete with accusations of douchebaggery, and comments like "Who would even read from the diary of a recovering addict, let alone share that information on TV and the internet! Just be angry everyone, and disregard this!", but it's still a story right now and it's ok to discuss it honestly and accurately. Just remember, Aristedes, the story came from very credible sources with solid track records for being accurate. If it came from CNN then I agree, the wise decision would be to dismiss it out of hand, but this info is not from an organization that's dedicated to disinformation so the wise thing to do is just file it in your head under "possible, plausible, or even likely, but definitely not proven yet" and then wait for the rebuttals and for other people, who are central to the accusation, to chime in. One thing that gives me reason to take this seriously is that it's also a pretty wicked accusation to make, which would easily blow back in the faces of the story's authors if incorrect. It's at the level of "career-destroying" if there's not some real oomph behind it. Another reason to take it seriously is that the POTUS sent several members of the FBI out to retrieve a diary. The personal diary of a recovering addict. That's pretty weird. They know that it isn't even a stolen diary, it's just a diary that was left behind somewhere. If it belonged to one of Trump's kids, no doubt the FBI would be lying about it to the FISA courts and airing the dirty laundry themselves, but that's not central to this story. The main thing is that the FBI felt like there was info in that diary that was important enough that they needed to invade people's homes to get it. There ya go. We all know that Biden has been credibly accused of rape, and that his kids have always been emotional train wrecks for some reason, and I think we'd all agree that Biden has a really creepy pedo vibe. This seems like a puzzle piece that fits perfectly. I do really feel bad for his daughter right now, and I hope that it doesn't do her more harm than good, but a bigger story is that the information in that diary actually could have been used for blackmail by anyone, not just Russia or China, and now that it's out in the open the opportunity for blackmailing the POTUS with the diary is greatly diminished. Bottom line - a majority of Americans already wish that Joe was out of office, and I doubt that this diary or any statements to come from his daughter in the upcoming weeks will aid in his removal, so it's just basically a case of "now ya know the buzz around this story". It will go away soon. The MSM needs it to go away, and they're the final arbiter. By next Saturday there will be plenty of new lies and disinformation out from the MSM which will distract you from this story. This will fade into oblivion, and maybe in a year or two you'll be looking for something on page 5 of the US Politics section and you'll see this thread and not even remember anything about it at first.

This was on Tucker Carlson Tonight, and it was also partially reported on by Project Veritas, so what I'm posting here is true: Joe's daughter left her diary in a halfway house after she got out of rehab, the next occupant of that room found it under the bed there, she sold it to Project Veritas. The FBI raided the homes of James O'Keefe and another PV reporter with guns out to retrieve the diary for some reason, and now reporters from another outlet, The Daily News, have released some info from it. The Daily News apparently decided to report on these things because they felt like it was something that the Russians or Chinses could use it to blackmail Joe if it remained a secret. Apparently she wrote in her diary that Joe took nude showers with her when she was a little girl, which she feels were "probably not appropriate" and she also writes that she was "hypersexualized" at a young age. Those are all facts, but whether or not it is proof that Biden is a pedo is up for debate. There are all kinds of photos of him being creepy and inappropriate with little children on the internet, plus a video of him kissing his early teen granddaughter on the mouth. I attached a photo of him kissing his granddaughter on the mouth, but there's video of it on the web as well. There's also a pic of him kissing the little boy on the mouth attached. What's in this post, while true, isn't enough evidence to say that he's is defintely a pedo, it's certain that he's inappropriate with small children in a fairly sexual way. This reminds of back when 1) people suspected M Jackson was a pedo and joked about it although there was no solid evidence, then 2) little bits of info started trickling out which were dismissed by the majority of the public, then 3) more and more info started coming out to the point where it was no longer in doubt. Biden is at stage 2 on the MJackson scale now, do you guys think that he's a full on Pedo?

A part of me died when I clicked like on your post.

Wow, 11 murders is a lot for the US in 43 years.

There's nothing wrong with being labeled correctly. I'm white, I'm male, I'm Canadian, I'm a conservative. So what? Say it all day. I couldn't care less. I wouldn't want to be called anything to the contrary because that would be a lie. Most people don't like to be assigned to groups by people who don't know Jack spit about them, for obvious reasons, but most importantly, people don't like to be slandered. If you're afraid to be called a leftist or an LPOC supporter that makes sense because those are quickly becoming pejoratives (because of people like ___).

Was it backwards day or something?

Our PM and our MSM do though, all the time, and they know that they're lying when they do it. You support them when they do it. You even go so far as to pretend to see Nazi flags raised high, with a group of militant inbreds proudly strutting along behind it. "Oh yes Mr Prime Minister, I SAW IT TOO! It was terrifying. I can't sleep at night knowing that 50% of the population, including basically every cis-gender male cracker in the country, wants to lynch all the coloured folk." Why do yo do that? Why doesn't it bother you when they do it? Why are you so afraid to say that it's wrong when they do it? Sheeple much? Why do you hold Nationalist to a higher standard than the PM? Why do you hold Nationalist to a higher standard than the CBC? I think that's pretty weird. I'd expect more from the PM and the CBC than from random, anonymous internet poster. The difference should be night and day. And I guess it is, but the random internet poster is the one with the integrity.

2019 may have been the peak of American/western society. We couldn't wait for 2020 to be over. We wanted to wake up from a bad dream. 2021 was no better. 2022, still trending down... It will take a long time to get back to where we were in 2019. Not just a year or two. More like ten.

You'll never know.

Sounds like I just told the truth about the Dems/CNN and some people are still in denial. Dolts: "But, but, but, Brionna was shot for sleeping black. M Brown was a gentle giant. The riots, assaults, murders and arson were mostly peaceful. Sandamn did taunt that native man racistly. Smollett was a victim. It's not a big deal that the FBI and Hillary's lawyer lied to the FISA court and presented false evidence. Joe Biden actually didn't know that Hunter was working at Burisma. And then when he admitted that he did know, it was just a beautiful moment of truth. You're a poopy head WestCanMan!" Is that basically where you were going there Beavey?

That's a total lie. When those guys debate they answer questions directly, and with facts, they don't change the subject and recite known lies and BS. You'd be in awe, like a caveman watching a jumbo jet taking off.

I said no one vouches for MSn and the Dems anymore, meaning in general. If 33% of Americans believe that the election was fraudulent that's a problem, and the Dems can't prosecute their way out of that.

Wow, what a stellar post. Your theory that a politician's popularity can't be judged by the size of their rallies is revolutionary! It's backed by the fact (lol) that 81 million people voted for Biden but a grand total of only 3,000 people came to see him in person at his 20 rallies. It's kind of like how everyone loved Gretzky, but no one ever came to his autograph signing sessions. He just sat there alone, dejected, like Biden at his "rallies". Were they even rallies, or were they more like sycophant-media-only press conferences? I don't think it qualifies as a rally if it's unattended. It's just a lonely old dementia victim with a microphone. If he holds his 2024 election rallies in a phone booth they won't be crowded, and he'll probably get 200 million votes.

If you think that the leftist MSM's coverage of one of those stories wasn't majority-lies then name it. The leftist MSM or Dems literally massacred the truth on every one of those stories. That's my statement of fact. I gave you an open-ended opportunity to say that they acted (Dems) or reported (MSM) with integrity on any one of those stories, or several if you want. Go ahead and look stupid. Accept the challenge Beave. You've defended almost all of that bullshit at some point in time. CNN & the Dems are your religion. You need to defend them. Their reputation has been called into question. It's not just that either: CNN's ratings tanked, then they had to fire some of their serial liars and pedophiles, and the Dems polling data shows that not many people are stupid enough to believe them anymore either. You, MH, and a small minority of people in the entire USA are willing to vouch for those clowns anymore. Even the latinos have abandoned the Dems, and the latinos are supposed to adore the Dems because of their open borders policy. Go fish. You're on the wrong side of history but you're clinging for all you're worth.

There's not a Dem or a leftist MSM personality that would touch a legitimate debate with Charlie Kirk, Dinsesh D'Souza or Ben Shapiro. It would be like earthworm vs samurai.