WestCanMan

We know that Trudeau can’t be part of a rational conversation about racism. He doesn’t even have an opinion, just a desire to be the world’s biggest virtue signaller. He’d call his own mom a racist just for a bump in the polls. “Oh look at that poor girl, smirking about her traumatic hijab incident! Canadians are scum!” Then when it’s a hoax, there’s no apology, he just doubles down against Canadians. Anyone he or his toadies pick out will be equally insipid. Honestly there’s nothing I could care less about than Trudeau’s opinion, or that of his useful idiots.

She wasn’t involved just like any American can be considered to be “uninvolved” when their employee or friend or cousin destroys evidence for them. Ok fine, but mr “Oh shit moment” should have gone to jail. A crime was committed, and that’s an undisputed fact. You are the epitome of a partisan hack. People you like are innocent when the actual facts of the matter are against them, and people you dislike are 100% guilty from the moment of the first unsubstantiated accusation. There’s no reason or unbiased consideration in you, you just regurgitate CNN talking points even when there has to be a part of you that knows you’re wrong.

Destroying evidence is a crime if you or I do it, but you’re willing to give Hillary a break. So awesome. Of course you aren’t addressing the he said, she said. It is garbage, so it goes directly against your narrative. The Dems started off saying “she needs to be believed” and you gobbled it up. Then you went along with their assertion that hers was the sronger case. Then when it became obvious that she is a lying bimbo you dialled it all back to “I don’t like the way he acts and I’m fit to judge whether or not he’s good enough for the job”. So you’re arrogant and refuse to admit that you were wrong this whope time, just being a lemming and a partisan hack.

You don’t want to get worked up about an actual crime that was committed but you got all worked up about an obvious BS case like the one against Kavanaugh. That pretty much sums up your politics and this whole thread.

Hillary’s aide said that. I don’t know if the FBI ever said that. And fyi, if they had permission to delete emails from a previous subpoena, but they didn’t bother to do it, that doesn’t mean the emails can’t be included in any further subpoenas. They were on the server at the time of the subpoena, and the FBI directed them to turn over “ALL THE EMAILS ON THE SERVER”. They were required to be given to the FBI, period. And the whole concept of “I’ll just sort through my emails and give you what’s relevant to your subpoena” is ridiculous to begin with. I hope I get to choose what evidence the police are allowed to sift through if I ever get arrested.

You gotta give him the benefit of the doubt though. He was probably just really drunk at the time, out looking for some weed, and desperate for a half-decent party to go to. They weren’t doing a whole lot of gang-rape parties in your neighbourhood back then. It was pretty lame for a guy like Brett. Chuck Norris actually went to a BK party. He got beat up. Then he went to another one with Steven Segal and Mike Tyson to get revenge, and they all got raped. Then they went to nine more parties. Avenatti is going to represent them in a civil suit. I’d paste a link or something, but I have to keep my sources anonymous. Everything seems so much more legit that way. Rachel Maddow, another anonymous source, and Bob Woodward taught me that. Don’t tell anyone where you got this info from, but remember, you heard it here first.

It’s not my belief at all. I don’t care who said what. Those emails were supposed to be turned in. It was her job to get it done. In 3 weeks she never bothered to do it, then they got destroyed. If that’s the new standard then the fbi will never get any evidence by subpoena.

What comes first, March 4th or 25th? Do you need a hint? Ok I’ll tell you, I’m not good at keeping surprises. The 4th comes first. Your birthday present is a deck of cards with four suits missing. DOH! Subpoena M4, “Oh shit (this crazy hag is gonna kill me if I don’t break the law for her)” moment M25.

Who said I have minority anxiety, or white guy persecution anxiety? I’m not the one pulling out my hair in anticipation of other people’s posts. “Ooh they’re not going to gobble up everything they read. What's wrong with them? How do they formulate opinions without the guidance of CNN or the CBC?”

I just sent an emotional support squirrel to your back yard. Free of charge.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-em/ Summary: A Clinton aide (Mills) said to the company managing Hillary’s server that emails older than 60 days “didn’t need to be kept”. A subpoena was sent to Hillary for all the emails on her server. About 2 weeks after the subpoena an employee had an “oh shit” moment and deleted 33,000 of them. Then he used bleach bit on the server. That employee also received the subpoena, I saw that in a different fact check page. Funny that it’s not that easy to find a decent fact check, and they all start off sounding pretty innocuous until you get down a few paragraphs. No one really says “Yes” right away. If we can all give our subpoenaed evidence to other people and it can be destroyed worry-free then subpoenas don’t mean jack anymore.

No change in tactics? The ability to make command decisions was moved from the Pentagon/oval office down to commanders closer to the situation, so that attacks could be quicker and more effective. Surrounding and killing Isis troops was also a more effective strategy than merely contesting ground and allowing escape. Obama himself admitted that getting rid of Islamic State in Syria would take years. Trump decimated them quickly, down to small pockets of resistance within months. Name a big muslim terrorist attack in the US in Trump’s 2 years? There was one every 6 months under Obama. Apparently having a government that wouldn’t condemn the attacks didn’t help them. Ill put a link re the deleted emails in the next post. Yes, not even a real crime. Don’t you speak english? Trump didn’t commit a crime by getting an NDA signed. People have been on trial for that before. It’s never stood up in court.

You think that there are only tens of fraudulent votes cast per election? Lol.

1) Paste a link for the intel on NoKo, and the sanctions are still on there anyways 2) You said CNN doesn’t jump to conclusions, then you said they all do in pursuit of eyeballs. So you’re admitting that you lied earier. And fyi Fox has the better track record for jumping to the right conclusions, so you should probably tune in there when things happen. 3) communities are so big now that no one knows 1% of the local voters anymore, so voter fraud is too easy now. There are also over 10M illegal residents in the US. If democracy is important then it’s also important to make sure people get to cast their own votes, and fraud is kept to a minimum. Pretty basic right? Also, what % of legal us citizens have no id, by your estimate? It’s such a small percentage that it’s less of a concern than fraudulent votes, plus it’s such a small cost to get id that a lack of id is no excuse. If you want to vote, get id. Really simple.

If you honestly fact checked your own statements Argus pretty much everything you said is a farce and you know it. I said how, Obaama was the one who said "the 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back", and he was caught on hot mic with Dmitri Medvedev, remember that one? Talk about collusion ffs. Islamic state was growing under Obama, rapidly dying under Trump. Trump didn't have a "plan", his plan was to let his generals make a plan. That's good leadership. There were a lot of terrorist attacks while Obama was in the whitehouse, but he refused to talk bad about them. They don't attack as much under Trump now do they? Weird. So you have suspicions again, not facts. CLINTON DESTROYED EMAILS AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED. EVEN SNOPES ADMITS IT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE ELSE ON EARTH WOULD HAVE GONE TO JAIL FOR. BS Argus. He was offered decades off his sentence to plead guilty to something that's not even a real crime.

Strength as in, carrier task forces, plural, on his doorstep? War games at the border. Mad Dog Mattis replying to his threat of shooting a missile by Guam with the simple words "If they shoot a missile towards us that's called war." And getting China to actually impose sanctions against him. That kind of strength. NoKo gave back the remains of some soldiers, let people out of jail, he stepped across the border to sign peace treaties. More progress was made with NoKo in a month than in the 30 years prior. They do rush to judge though. "GUN CONTROL ISSUE" came out of their mouths to describe a crime scene with no legal guns on it. When terrorists attack with vans they still talk about gun control. You are the one who refuses to see Argus. People need ID to drive, to buy booze, to buy guns, to buy weed, to use their medical.... There's nothing easier to do than grab a phone book and go to the polling station to cast votes for people. Your point is literally 100% idiotic and yet you stand behind it puffing out your chest. Get a grip.

You can do it in the States apparently. Just grab a phone book so that you have 20,000 names and addresses. Go from polling station to polling station and give them a random name from the book. You can vote 20 times in a day if you're fast enough to get around to enough stations. See how many wildly different people you can vote for. Make sure that their names don't match up with your face just for kicks. "Hi I'm Gurpreet Singh and I'm here to vote!" "Hi I'm Kim Smith and I'm here to vote! You know Kim is a guy's name too, right?" "Hi I'm Dayquanda Jackson Jr. and I'm here to vote!" "Hi I'm Sue Johnson and I'm here to vote. My dad was a big Johnny Cash fan." "Hi I'm Xin Xiaopang and I'm here to vote! Which party do I have to vote for if I want my son to be able to get into Harvard despite the fact that we are asian? Is it the Republicans? Oh it is, ok thanks." "Hi my name is T^pook Kpok Naoomaopo. This is my first time voting, I grew up in Africa. I lost my tan because of the crappy Seattle weather. Have a nice day!"

It's sad to see how many people can be influenced to believe such a serious accusation based on such a flimsy case with so many obvious flaws. If anything, this just proves how important it is to get people on the bench with the ability to impartially consider evidence and testimony.

I'm 100% up to speed on the level of evidence required. I'd even put the required standard miles lower than a preponderance of the evidence for Kavaanugh. Any actual evidence, or corroboration of her specific story, would have been enough to sink Kavanaugh's boat. But her case got weaker and weaker under every level of scrutiny applied to it: FBI investigation, the careful consideration of her own details, testimony from people who knew Dr Ford, character witnesses for BK.... All roads point away from the appearance of guilt. The most compelling evidence backing her claim is that BK might have been really drunk a few times while he was in University. No one who applies for a SCJ position will ever pass that test but even if it's true, you can always find some people to claim the opposite. The actual evidence is zero point zero zero. 0.00%. Zip. Zilch. Nada. There's just no evidence aside from 1 woman who lied about several material facts in her case and another woman that had a totally farcical story to begin with. If you want to abandon presumption of innocence that's just your opinion, but literally no one can ever be appointed to the SC if their political opponents can stop their nomination just by finding two people who are willing to tell lies that are so vague that they can never even be turned into a perjury case. Eventually there will be no more SCJs.

Obama wasn't negotiating from a position of strength against those countries. He was being a whiner and a wimp. Trump had no choice but deal with KJU. CNN lies all the time. When a guy runs around screaming praises to allah they always start with "It's too early to say that it's Islamic terrorism". They did it about the Pulse nightclub shooting. Tried to pass it off as a gun control issue, even though the guns used were 100% illegal to begin with. You can't watch anything on that channel and take anything they say seriously. OMG, to say that Republicans are trying to stop people from voting is seriously the best example of drinking the kool-aid that Ive ever seen. Too funny.

I don't know much about the early Obama years. I was happy that they elected an African American, I thought it would be good for the country. All I really ever cared about before was that they didn't start any crazy wars. Obama put the USA in the toilet. He couldn't have done more damage if he tried. Wrong about Russia, weak against them, wrong about Islamic State, weak against them, wrong about domestic terrorism, weak against them, wrong about police shootings and ran his mouth, started the country on fire and never did anything about it, and you could basically blame his big mouth and big ego for the rise of Donald Trump. The Mueller investigation is a huge farce. The FBI has lost every shred of integrity they ever had in the last few years with their "bungling" of the Clinton investigation and now their sham of a "Russian collusion investigation". The pressure tactics that they are using on Cohen and Manafort are a disgrace to democracy. The DNC primary was a disgrace, the rigged debates were a disgrace, Hillary destroying evidence and getting away with it was a disgrace, Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch's "coincidental" tarmac meeting was a disgrace, ad the top 5 members of the FBI and Brennan are a huge disgrace. There actually is a swamp in DC. I don't know how far it pre-dates Obama but it's disgusting. The Republicans have a bunch of misogynist/cheaters. So do the Dems. Let's be honest, probably a handful of people in Congress and the Senate combined could live up to the scrutiny that's on Trump. People like Maxine Waters are even openly crass and disgusting on national tv. Whether you're a Dem or Libertarian you're still buying into the hypocrisy of defending Bill Clinton, the actual rapist.

Who has proof of anything re: SCJ nominations? Is there some level of proof that’s suddenly required, when just a week ago the Democrats and their toadies tried to set the precedent that evidence was just a formality?

The Republicans didn't stoop to the level of the Democrats and bring in some someone to accuse him of almost raping them, at an unknown location, four decades ago, with no witnesses, and fake PTSD symptoms. Am I right?

Right Argus. If you have so much to say about Fox's fake news then why don't you reply to my points from earlier? Or throw down some examples of your own? Vague accusations is all you've got Argus. It's your go-to and it's getting old really fast. I can watch CNN for ten minutes tonight and catch them lying. If it was a drinking game everyone would be dead by the first commercial break. African Americans who can think for themselves reject the democrat narrative. Americans of any stripe who are susceptible to emotionally-charged, fact-starved drivel are sucked right in.