CITIZEN_2015

Long prison sentences for defying to wear the forced hated imposed islamic hijab by islamic republic court. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-court-upholds-long-prison-sentences-of-anti-hijab-women-activists/30420949.html

It is completely the reverse of what you say. The religion has all those rules but choices made by some (educated) individuals not to practice the rules or obey by it. Like divorce in Christianity strictly forbidden and now we have a situation where most of marriages in Christian countries ends up in divorce. Ask them the religion if they are not committed to a religion or strictly practicing or fanatic about the rules or believing in them they would answer no religion.

The last thing I am is religious or worse fanatic. I am also as per my posts a very strong Liberal supporter. Though I am also a very reasonable person while I believe in total Women's rights, freedom of choice and equality and very hard campaigning for all them especially in regions where a certain religion suppresses them however, it is not part of a women's right to control the life and death of an entity which is no longer a part of her body. This is scientifically proven that in the last 3 months of a women's pregnancy the fetus is now a baby with a heart beat and a separate entity than a women;s body. It is NOT a women's right to kill a baby just because it happens to be in her body anymore than it is her right to kill that baby after she was born.

No abortion should be allowed only when it is a fetus which scientifically proven to be the first few months and must NOT be allowed the last 3 months of pregnancy. It is a women's choice up to a point. If the women cannot make up her mind till the final 3 months when the fetus is a living baby with heartbeat then it is not her body anymore to have a control over. It is a separate entity in her body and someone else's body and life. Her baby.

I agree with this but there has been also good immigrants from Middle East so we can't imposed a regional ban from that region without probing further.

The religion being practiced by applicant should be added to the questionnaire. Those religion(s) forcing women what to wear, marry at 9 years, inherit less than half, allows a man have more than one wife ...... if anyone commits alliance in writing should be screened out of the immigration system.

Those who come here and find the values and culture uncomfortable go back home. Simple and easy.

Criticism yes insulting no. His policies may be criticized though personal attacks on him are insulting.

I told you that seeing the (misleading) title is no option but reading the OP is that most people won't exercise that option and only see the misleading title which is intended in an unfair manner to offend Mr. Trudeau. Mr. Trudeau is a democratically ELECTED leader of this great country called Canada. He is not one who came to power in a coup or stays in power by hired thugs. By insulting the elected leader of Canada you and others who follow this route are in fact insulting all Canadians.

My comment was with reference to the TITLE not the comments made within OP and I stand by my original comments. Most people only see the title without reading the related OP as we can't help not seeing it as we have no option but we do have the option not to read the OP.

I agree with you and it is a very sour fact I have to painfully swallow. The fact that Trump has indicated he is ready to negotiate with this brutal regime (and at the same time he calls them murderous so he is fully aware of atrocities this regime is committing against Iranian people) is evidence to this fact. As fr change from within it is already established that this regime is not reformable. Any real change would mean this islamic republic must go to the garbage bag of the history. However, the change may mean a lot of bloodshed at current state as we both agree this regime is bloodthirsty and prepares to murder the entire population for its survival. I am not sure the change will come at less cost or there will be less bloodshed than a full scale foreign invasion. So I cannot agree that foreign intervention would be more costly than a revolution. My only hope is that if the sanctions continue and tightened and Europe Joins the US (for their own interests of course) and the regime runs out of money to pay its thugs and the economy dives further and faster then a general strike and massive uprising will follow and the regime security forces would refuse to open fire on the masses (their own brothers and sisters) to save a corrupt bankrupt unpopular regime and hence with little bloodshed a change may come. This is the scenario that the regime is very aware of and as why they react at the start of any protest and shut down the internet immediately to prevent it from fast gathering momentum. Again and again but all that is needed is ONE time success for the good over evil.

A few corrections are warranted here with all due respect. 1 - eyeball comments quoted below is clearly about the admission of guilt not apology. 2 - It was Reagan not Senior Bush and he apologized in 1988 a few days after the tragedy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1988/07/06/reagan-apologized-to-iran-for-downing-of-jetliner/9523c6dc-a244-4b3b-90e9-054168d98c79/ 3 - Why it is so difficult to see the very clear distinction? The US shot down a plane full of another country's citizens very likely by mistake as there was no gain for the US in that tragedy. BUT the Iran murderous islamic regime shot down a plane full of its OWN citizens and at this point in time I cannot prove that it was totally intentional because they refuse to hand over the black box or release communications that took place between the revolutionary thugs at the time. Why is that they did not close Iran's airspace as any country would do during the war or heighten tension?? Because it was part of their plan. Using their own citizens as human shield is only expected of regimes like islamic republic or Assad of Syria they deserve each other. 4 _Iranian citizens are being targeted by both evil sides and they are the only victims. On one hand Iran regime's thugs targeting their hearts and heads and kill hundreds of them or shoot down the plane full of Iranians and on the other the US president announces support for them but prevents them from entering the US.

That is NOT true. The US admitted shooting down the plane by mistake immediately not 8 years after. So in your view murdering 176 people in a plane is a screwup? They only admitted to it after overwhelming satellite and video evidence. May I also remind you they went after and arrested the Iran citizen who took the video and put it on social media. And they are refusing to send the black box overseas!!!! Why? It is a mass murder and when it is finally discovered that the regime shot down the plane ON PURPOSE so that to blame it on American attack, then it is a mass murder and Iran leaders must face international justice. The US attack which never came and screwed up their plan so you may call this latter case as screw up not a mass murder that this islamic regime keep committing (like targeting and shooting to death over 400 women and children and over a 1000 defenseless unarmed protesters last November and many similar massacres before daring back to 1978 (burning alive over 400 people in Cinema Rex at Abadan). How can anyone as a human being try to minimize violent crimes committed by this murderous regime?

Immigration program is not a charity program. It is supposed to allow in people ALREADY highly educated or those with enough assets to open up new businesses and benefit Canadians. However, by far more important criteria the program is currently lacking is to keep out those who do not believe in Canadian values like respect for women's choice and their equality and respect for other religions and cultures.

I agree. This is one case that I agree with a regional ban. Stop travelers from China and any other infected country till it is more clear what is going on.

I agree with you. I was skeptical about the topic (screening terrorists in interviews) and I didn't think it was serious. There is no way anyone can determine if someone is a terrorist by asking questions. However, my questions may keep some who in my book are undesirables out but not terrorists.

For that I need a NO test (do you have any kind of STD)!!!!!!!!. Both tests however are designed to keep out the harmful.

Trudeau was not in the UN to vote. Canada's representative did and that is how it always worked and still work for all countries. Trudeau is an elected Prime Minister of Canada. He is not some dictator who came to power by a military coup or an unelected murderer trying to preserve his regime by manipulation, intimidation, jail and and killing its own citizens. It is insulting to all Canadians to call Trudeau a dictator as many have tried to do.

Smoking pot is not a sign for terrorism but if it was up to me I wouldn't allow pot smokers around myself.

Then the title of this thread is made deliberately misleading as the worst dictatorships are named to have voted same as Canada (and it is Canada not Trudeau who voted for resolution). Why it didn't say Canada joins Germany and UK yo vote against Israel instead?. Purposely to make Trudeau look bad but it is not going to work.

Screening for terrorists? How about starting with screening those who do not respect Canadian values like total equality for women and freedom f choice on what to wear and who to marry and respect for religions. Then you likely screen terrorists out. As fir what Questions to ask: Do you believe that women (including those of their family members) should have to right to refuse to wear hijab? Do you believe that females (including those of their family members) are entitled to be in a sexual relationship of their choice before choosing who to marry? Do you agree that the age for consensual sex will be 16 and marriage is at least 18 for females? Do you agree that a man can only have ONE wife? Do you believe women are in all aspects equal to men and must inherit half and have the right to divorce? Do you agree that Canada is a Christian majority country and Canadian values must be respected (like Christmas, diversity, freedom of speech, equality)? Do you believe that you have no right to come here and try to change the traditions and Canadian values? Do you accept that if you break any of above you will be given a one way ticket back home? If the answers to all these questions are genuinely YES then I would consider to admit them if I assess they will become tax payers for life and will contribute very positively to Canada.

The anatomy of a lie: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/26/world/middleeast/iran-plane-crash-coverup.html

Victims of plane crash suing the regime leader and his military. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/families-of-downed-plane-victims-in-canada-suing-iran-s-leader-and-military/30396663.html Ali-Asghar Gorji, uncle of Puneh Gorji, said in a Facebook post January 24 families are suing the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic and the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) for a “terrorist act”. Gorji in his post added that victims’ families are also planning to appeal to the International Criminal Court. He did not refer to how many families are involved or their identities but explained that because of expected pressures by Iranian authorities on family members, they will remain anonymous. Mr. Gorji appealed to all victims’ families to join the legal effort.

I can see your point. The question is for how long and how many the security forces are ready to kill their own brothers and sisters in order t save a corrupt increasing unpopular regime especially when the regime becomes so bankrupt under sanctions that they may not be able to pay off their thugs.

It is the tragedy of the century under the watch of a peanut brain president Carter. The whole world changed for worse but especially Iran and Iran nation paid a heavy price, The revolutionary thugs are well identified now by a big majority of Iranians as the protectors of the murderous regime who stand short of nothing to preserve this murderous regime including mass killing of its own citizens as they have proven again and again. However, an American attack when civilians will be killed would backfire as this deceiving regime would portrait the thugs as defenders of the nation when they fire back at Americans. This would be a horrible scenario and a big tragedy, That is how they benefited from all the wars and hate they have created themselves (the regime) in the past. The regime must fall by Iranians themselves with full political support from the US and the West. It is the islamic regime not Iran which is under attack from within (by its own people) and out (by US) and hopefully soon as political and economic pressures continue and increase then it will pay off BIG time and rescue this defenseless nation from the murderous mullahs,