Freddy

So the question is.If we are to rise above this instinctive behaviour, of valuing women's lives more then men's. And treating men as disposable. What direction do we collectively decide to take? We need to all agree on the directional path our superior intellectual capacity should be able to help us direct in. I say as it is the women who mostly want to behave more like men. We should treat women as disposably as we do men. That way we don't end up with a bunch of cry baby's in the science lab each time things get a little difficult. You want the privilege of living the high risk lives us males have had the last thousands of years, taking risks and discovering new ideas and inventions . Then suck it up buttercup. Taking risks means you run the chance at difficulties and pain. Or are you of the opinion we should treat everyone like a little princess?

Your sounding like a crazy person. It's like your trying to make something up to make it sound like a good thing is actually a bad thing......

Interesting. But is it forced conscription volunteering like in communist countries? Or it's strictly out of free willingness to help?

The environmentalists around here haven't given me a very good opinion of them. I'm sure some of the tree huggers, aren't total hypocrites. Like the ones who live like hermits far away in the wilderness a existence closely resembling survival of a animal.

I got a bunch of tree huggers that live all around here. I think it's funny how they all vote green and buy pesticide every year for their lawns. One of them started yelling at my kid for breaking a branch on a tree in my yard lol

Omg! Why can't these people who keep having children just figure out how to adopt a dog already!!! Geeezes. Oh no! A dandelion on my front yard! Kill it!!!! I'm voting Green for sure this election.

Canadian environment, As in your front yard. Grass is such a precious thing for us Canadians.

We have a lot of folks where I live that care more for their front yard lawns then for other human kids. You should move down here, they all sit on there porches and wait all day to yell at any kids that run on their lawn. you'd fit right in.

Most people can't bring themselves to speak ill of themselves. They say it's not healthy. If we are going to better ourselves it helps if we can find and admit what category we are mediocre at. My judgment on my country is in the hope we can change and become more interesting. Collectively. Right now it's nothing to get exited about, that's for sure. My community consists of a bunch of old people sitting on their porches waiting for a kid to run on their lawn so they can screen at them to get off their lawn. That sums up canada well at the moment.

Lack of vision seems to run rampant in our Canadian population. We are a low risk tolerance population that wants everything but are waiting for someone else to do it for them. So we get the kind of politician, that best represent us. I think the lot of present candidates represent Canadians perfectly. Your perceived problem may be more to do with how boring Canadians are in general. Not the boring politicians who are trying to gain votes from boring Canadians who watch TV 25+hours a week.

The communist system is based on volunteer work. Everyone works for free. Our socialist systems are more like a charity based system where everyone must pay a sum out of their personal gains. Our system is better insulated from the weakest link in our collectivity. Because we have competition and the best at what they do is awarded with the gains. It stimulates people to work towards being good at what they do. And helps raise the level of competence in our population. We use the idea that it's better for you to work towards not being the weakest link. We give the ability to our population to capitalize on their high level of intelligence, knowlage and skills. And you are rewarded for achieving those things.

Our government isn't communist. Thankfull. As everyone is interdependent on each other to do their volunteering work. If someone falls out of line, everyone suffers, so punishment must be constantly enforced.As for our government we don't do volunteering. We all give money to it like a charity. It isolates us from each other's incompetence. Somewhat.

Or . Collectively as a chain. You are only as intelligent as your weakess link. Especially in a govermemt system & economy that everyone support each other and depend on each other.

Stimulate that to 5% population growth , and in the long run you will have 5% economic growth. It's almost that simple. If our buying power stay's relatively the same.Alleviate the difficulties of having children, in the hope we reproduce at higher rates. Free daycare could help the economies

Your right on about lowering taxes on corperations. It won't do a thing to help grow our economie a whole lot.My philosophy is help the population grow and your economie will grown as a simple conseuquence.

It depends on all variable factors of Supply and demand.

In principle the conservatives and liberals are right. More money in the hands of business should stimulate growth. Unfortunately there are other big factors in play. Like zero population growth, and a market place that's very saturated with competition. Lower taxes on corporations is equal across the field of corporate players. And with the market as saturated as it is, the competition level has forced all corporations to simply transfered the tax cut into less expensive products for the consumer. Now that helps the consumer with his ability to buy more. If you want to grow the economy, Stimulate families to have as many children as they can. For businesses to grow. The market demand must grow. That is the underlining factor. Demand trumps everything for economic growth. Population and the rate at which they can consume.

If we are going to head away from instinctive thinking, (and let's be honest, it can't be that bad if it got us to where we are today) Then a clear map should be drawn that we all can agree on, so that we don't lose site of each other and ourselves on our journey to this superior way of being. As it stands the way I look at it, It's not achievable, It's not realistic. It can only exist in our imagination. Reality has other plans.

Women ultimately could decide how the majority of humans evolve, as they are the primary chooser of who they reproduce with & what they find sexually attractive, If they wanted very weak none violent smaller then they are males. Then men would gradually evolve into that.But a bad boy seems to be more popular.

I was linking the obvious fact that men perform better in Olympic because of of this constant disposability. It means that only the very strongest male genes usually make it to reproduction. As opposed to the female counterpart genes who rarely don't make it to reproduction. There is less stress on being extremely performing, on all levels. For me it all fits in very logically.

When your working for someone else you don't control any of that. That's what employees don't understand.

In a ideal world we could tax everyone right into the dust. Unfortunately rich people have more resources to bypass any regulation and punishment we make. And you'll spend more money policing it then the revenues you'll get from it. If reality didn't exist, Communism would work too.

there is no such thing as tax fairness. Especially when anyone above 120 000$ a year can probably move to a different country and take his money with him.

Your giving them way more credit then they deserve. To think they even have a feint idea that they know what their doing is funny. They don't have a plan. They just do whatever seems to gain the most support at that moment.

remember when we used Saddams slaughter of Curds as a excuse? Now those Curds want their own country.