Freddy

That's the definition when one is taking advantage of the other.. If you're co-dependent and both members are being equally productive towards the relationship. You're definition is more simply being dependent on somone but that person is not dependent on you. Like a child. Co dependency is two individuals living life as a team. One playing forward and the other playing defense.

How do you become co-dependent on each other emotionally?

Yes everyone can take care of themselves. But a marriage of two people is a union. You become one. I thought it was the whole point to become co-dependent on each other.

Well that's not bad but not really super healthy.

Which brings me to the next subject. I feel like we constantly are trying to shame masculinity. Like you should be ashamed of it? The hell with that!!!!! That's like trying to shame femininity.

We're having a conversation, sharing ideas. It's usually the enjoyable part of a forum, If we let it take its own life.

After a long time of truly loving someone, based on co-dependency, You can't even imagine your life without the other. You become one. Just their presence warms your heart. Taking care of each other with the traditional "masculine/feminine roles IS the wine and dinning.

Personally I don't want my wife to want to have sex with me for any reason other then the fact she loves me deeply and will likely get multiple orgasm as a result.

I'm not arguing, I'm agreeing. Yes everyone has his "special brand". It would be boring if every man had the same masculinity don't you think?

I'm with you on this one. I don't see a relationship lasting the test of time under such circumstances. It's the same with wine and dinning. Obviously you're relationship has some major issues if you haven't moved on from that. I'd be feeling unfulfilled too.

yes. The same way femininity can be different from one women to a other. Preferences may very from people to people. They usually don't very enormously.

Defined as having abandoned some or all of his masculinity.

I'm blaming it on feminist males. Masculinity is important in fulfilling those female sexual needs. The same way a women being feminine fulfills a man.

It kind of is, because like it says in the article, Feminist are in some ways, in their own way, of their own happiness. Many will go through life unfulfilled.

Because with time a relationship should get a lot more intense sexually then wine and dining.After 10-15 years if all your doing is still wine and dinning, I'd say you're relationship has never evolved or blossomed.

Maybe in the very beginning . I feel more emotionally attached for the opposite reasons, where I know she depends on me and I depend on her for specific tasks. That way we complete one a other, that if one stopped taking care of the other we would stop being functional as a person, couple & family.

also says it leaves them sexually in satisfied. That is exactly true. It says women are using sexual bribery as a way of controlling men but is leaving them in satisfied. Because they would much rather have a wild stallion of a man "alpha male" have their way with them instead of a weakling feminist male that will do anything for a little piece of action.

It's all based on that study. Can you explain too me why many girls sexual preference naturally gravitate towards the bad boys? And why many modern woman have turned sex into a commodity reward for male obedience? It's not like I expected any woman to openly admit to any of this.

Looks like the study backs up my argument. I hope you learned something. I'd hate to see a fellow male miss out on all the fun I'm having pleasuring my women.Quit being a feminist male, and live as Nature intended you to be. And don't worry, they will love you even more for it. The truth is women don't want equality, they want to control men.

It's probably attributed to the fact that the OP is completely biased, and couldn't even take a second to understand for a minute why conservatives see the world differently. We are looking at the world from a different angle, prioritizing different values. If he only took a minute and try to put himself in any conservatives shoes he would realize that we are not so evil like he likes to believe. But how could he, when that would result in his whole world collapsing suddenly. He wouldn't have the balls to do it.

So feminist men get rewarded with unsatisfactory commodity sex for being total suck up. And traditional males naturally turn women on with their display of masculinity resulting in very satisfying sex and multiple orgasm for the women.

that link means nothing to this thread, you would have to be suggesting only feminist males are doing housework. This is completely ridiculous. Here is a list of traditional male household work. Shovelling, house repair, planting, cutting trees and grass, change the oil in the vehicle. Prep the pool, cut and cord fire wood. I'm willing to take a bet old fashioned males do more housework then feminist males. Women love feminist men because their always sucking up to them. They love traditional males because we make them wet in their underpants.

You know the saying right? If you aren't liberal by 20 you have no hart. If you're not conservative by 35 you have no brain.

. Even worse, he thinks he understands things.

Yes, it's not like lawyers will look after your best interests for free.