WWWTT

Little of topic here, but you should see the new Ontario liberal attack adds on the ONDP! WWWTT

here's section 11 of the charter: PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL AND PENAL MATTERS. 11. Any person charged with an offence has the right (a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence; ( to be tried within a reasonable time; © not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence; (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; (e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause; (f) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment; (g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations; (h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and (i) if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment. Section 11(h) does not refer to what is being discussed. However 11(I). WWWTT

You're going to have to provide an example of where this has happened. That's a fairly involved conclusion you're making here. I want you to back up your opinion with an actual example where you can specifically point to something that made you come to this conclusion. WWWTT

There has never been an Canadian referendum on going to war. Therefore, it has always been a government decision, never one by the peoples. WWWTT

Agreed! If this becomes reality, it will be another case where Canadian troops go to war for our government, not Canadian people! WWWTT

This comment is out of context to this thread?!?!?!?! Or I should say the first part of your comment. As for the second part, I'm sure that an airline pilot has a very attractive lifestyle and salary. Your comment does not make any sense???? WWWTT

Australia and Malaysia are very reliant on tourists arriving by plane. They have great interest in improving their searching abilities. I'm disappointed that Canada wasn't involved in this search. WWWTT

Sure, comment all you want. Their morality impacts us or our economy? Does our morality impact the Chinese people or the Chinese economy too? Or is this just a one way street? WWWTT

I have heard several different stories about this. If you have more than one child, you have to pay additional taxes. Also heard of another procedure that when a women gives birth in a hospital, the doctors does something medically to the mother to make it difficult for her to conceive another child. As far as I'm concerned, if you don't live in China, you don't have a right to judge the morality of their culture. WWWTT

Public urination!!! That one alone brings an incredible amount of shame to Toronto! WWWTT

This has become too complex an issue for e to follow, having a bad cough/cold doesn't help either. I'm stepping away from this one I think. WWWTT

I don't think you can blame MLW for not looking for other forums more suited for your debate. WWWTT

Forced abortions? Do you have a link to back that up. My wife and I know of several couples who have more than one child in China. When I was last there, I met an couple who had around 4 children, but they were all adopted. WWWTT

Didn't know there was a 90 day suspension. That's harsh! WWWTT

Oh ya we both agree the suspension was too long. The point I was making is that even if I don't get the same out of waldo's posts as you do, I still can see others do. WWWTT

I don't share your opinion on his comments, or at least some of them. However he does contribute a significant amount, I may not get the same out of it as you do, but we do agree on a couple points here. WWWTT

Ya I think I meant to write something like that in my comment but for some reason it still didn't feel right?!?!?! Hazel McCallion apparently likes the sauce as well. I heard a similar rumour about Susan Fennel (mayor of Brampton that I freekin wouldn't miss if she was voted away forever!) Being the mayor of a major city requires major decisions to be made, I would hope that these politicians have a clear head 99% of the time. I can see if you fall ill and are not yourself or if you are forced to take medication. But getting wasted on a regular basis??? WWWTT

I think you're letting your past experience with waldo influence you. The moderation here is taking a different approach, more favourable and lenient on the posters. 1 month in my opinion is too strict! WWWTT

Man you're stretching it thin here! Especially when the illegal act of drinking under age happened at Harper's house! Let me ask you, is it OK to drink and drive? Would you feel safe if you flew on a plane where the pilot two days ago was so drunk, he totally forgot everything that occurred ? The mayor of a major Canadian city can't be getting wasted and be addicted to substances! There are some standards that must be kept. If your excuse for denying smoking crack is because you were too drunk to remember, then you should have thought about your addiction problems before running for public office! This Rob Ford character is just plain selfish and a very poor decision maker, that is so obvious, he just has to go! WWWTT

Here's a funny pic! WWWTT

Ok then waldo sent me a message giving me his blessing to openly discuss his case/suspension. I think that the moderation has acted too harshly and that he should not be suspended for such a long period of time. I'd like to ask the moderation to reconsider their position. WWWTT

Yes you could be right, I'll give you that. But I have also read a lot here too! And judging from the wording used, I believe I am a little more careful. I'm sure that CA also takes into consideration the exact wording that is used. Don't get me wrong, I don't always agree with CA, especially on the last warning point I received! Just stating that I believe that there are trends here that may give some kind of indication. WWWTT

I believe CA has stated/implied that he is getting something from this thread. If that is truly the case, then I feel it's worth continuing with this thread, making comments and reading other posters comments/debates. WWWTT