WWWTT

No I did not read that part. The article I read did not mention that. Did the truck driver remain on the scene? How close was he travelling to the alleged truck? WWWTT

Yes it does! You obviously never been to a trial where the judge asked you "why did you not see the vehicle in front of you"!!! WWWTT

You're the one making the idiotic disrespectful and rude comment here buddy! Starting to get real tired of you acting like as if you are the "Moral voice" of MLW buddy! Why don't you just ignore my comment and report it buddy! WWWTT

Yes! When I last checked, vision was a pre requisite for driving. Why was this guy not able to see the stopped vehicle? Keep in mind that a stopped vehicle looks like a stopped vehicle even without hazard lights on. WWWTT

Not very experienced with bikes so I will take your word. I know enough to know very well that I will steer clear of them on the road and I won't get on one beyond a recreational off road bike putting around. I also tried checking out the pics, but I only had more questions than answers. Leaving your car stopped in the middle of the road would only be partial responsibility in my opinion. You still have to be in control of your vehicle. It's not like she pulled out in front of someone. Her vehicle was not moving. WWWTT

LOL! WWWTT

She can still appeal the first ruling. Or did she? WWWTT

Heard a lot of arguments back and forth on this one. Quebec seems to be a hot bed for some controversial cases lately. Anyways, I find it odd that someone was able to stop there vehicle to help a distressed animals, but another person, driving on the same freekin road, couldn't even stop to save their own stupid life! Now, I'm not entirely sure of all the conditions, but this sounds like a very odd case again. Also, these odd cases seem to be a magnet for debate! WWWTT

I saw Charles Anthony made a comment on this thread and thought it would be worth my time to check out what he thought of a recent idea for an improvement or maybe he had one. I was disappointed to see that again he locked another thread, then re opened it. I scanned back 4-5 pages to see if there was any ideas or discussion for improvements. I gave up around 4-5 pages because I could plainly see that this was just a free for all rant about trolling. Man what a waste of freekin time reading that BS some of you people go on about! Here's an idea. Every time a thread goes way off topic about trolling or some other stupid bickering (and not just a few comments, I'm talking about pages!), the thread gets flagged (similar as to when a thread is popular, it gets flagged "hot") I really don't like any threads getting locked for any period of time whatsoever! Maybe this could be an alternative. This way some of us can save a little time and avoid the bickering if we don't feel in the mood of getting involved. LOL, or am I spun to actually make a suggestion for an improvement? WWWTT

More BS! Never said what kind of system was best or what I would suggest. Just pointing out that our system IS NOT A DEMOCRACY! What we have is a system that is susceptible to corruption, manipulation and being/already has been commandeered! All the orders come out of the PM's office. Don't like it, well then you will get kicked out of caucus, and good luck getting re elected as an independent. Bet you can't name more that a handful of indi's! Like I said before, try your luck at the local level. But even there, you will still need a 6 figure campaign expense smaller outer regions the only exception. WWWTT

Whatever buddy, keep voting. If the government does something you don't like, vote even harder! That'll teach em a lesson! WWWTT

Guess you never heard of an omnibus bill and how that works for open discussion. I also guess your mp calls you personally to ask you how to vote too right? Oh ya, and where on that referendum can you forward your own bill???? You know what, you better quit now because you're just helping me prove why we don't live an democracy. Like I said before, if you really believe voting matters, than allow younger voters. If you think that allowing younger voters will actually usher in a new government, then you're way in too far! WWWTT

Ya that was just a side note. Guess you rather argue the little side notes because you have nothing else. Still waiting to see a copy of that cheque you write your MP every month. WWWTT

BS! If your candidate gets in, they are now a sock puppet for the leader of the party Guess you never heard of "towing the party line" Possibly if you contribute thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours, and have many allies on the riding association executive, you may be able to squek out a rough private members bill. If it gets the leaders approval. But is it worth it? Nope! WWWTT

You perfectly answered why you do not live in a democracy. Actually, you have about a 1 in 50,000 chance of ever voting on or having the ability to introduce anything to do with government. Try at the municipal level, your best odds are there. Of and by the way, unless you actually write the check in your name and sign it, nobody works for you! Don't believe me? Go to Queens park/Parliament hill/local municipal offices and try to fire someone. If you do, you'll be kissing the pavement real fast buddy, or better yet, spending the night in jail! WWWTT

Is that the best you got? Man that's pathetic. Name a motion or a private members bill you last introduced. I will also accept a resolution that you voted on. The best chance you got of living in a democracy, is at the municipal/local level. WWWTT

Oh you mean the "democracy" where you have no right to vote on anything that will effect you? Ya I'm really concerned WWWTT

Correction. You have the right to vote for someone, who in turn, will make the decisions upon your behalf! You have absolutely no right to vote on ANY DECISIONS that may effect you! If you think a pile of crap is worth fighting for, then you have been brainwashed into thinking a pile of crap is the Taj Mahal! WWWTT

Are you under the impression that a debate site stops debate under the travel, leisure and sports heading? Do I have to be "into" sports to contribute under this thread? WWWTT

Looks like that everyone whom has contributed to this thread actually believes that voting makes a difference. If you think voting is the way to go, then lower the age, the more the merrier. If you think that lowering the voting age will usher in a new age of special interest control over government, then you're really brainwashed into thinking that voting makes a difference! WWWTT

LOL! You enjoyed watching me accomplish nothing on a debate site?!?!?!? You think I really care about football??? WWWTT

Because I live in a Portuguese community and my parents are Portuguese. Don't really care if they win or lose because my life will not change either way. No use beyond entertainment value. WWWTT

Enjoy your life watching other people accomplish things from the comfort of your going no where coach then! And as far as knowing about watching sports, who cares. WWWTT