WWWTT

Never said that I was against the fact that there are bad apples. But you seem to want to believe that. WWWTT

Yes very true! I agree! However there were many more issues with his failing health. The amount of medication required turned him into a person I never knew. WWWTT

In my father's case, he had a couple of strokes and a heart attack. This weakened him severely. In his last 6 months, it was problem after problem after problem. Then 2 months before he died, his intestinal cancer returned with a vengeance and the doctors said that there was no point in attempting to cure it because of all the other health issues. It was actually a blessing to exit from pain and humiliating weakness. WWWTT

Nope sorry, not my problem you want to brush off real factual examples where the courts have failed when not considering the rights OF ALL THE PEOPLE INVOLVED!!!!!!!! The purpose of the court is to apply the law, not to protect specific parties! Stop moving away from our debate here and debate! WWWTT

Why? Why would you go buy a firearm to carry with you when the people involved in this case were all carrying firearms? What kind of logic is that? WWWTT

Did I say it was? WWWTT

Or a military colonel committing murder rape (Russell Williams)? WWWTT

Hypothetical argument. If there is a politician accused of a crime, then let's discuss/debate that with its own thread and particulars. I won't debate that point any further because that's all you have with that one , a hypothetical argument where you can create an entire fantasy world! WWWTT

I think you are right. But charge does not mean conviction. WWWTT

Killing a cop usually carries a first degree. But you have to be aware that you are killing a cop. But it sounds like you are making things up again! Read em and weep buddy! http://ri.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEViASCpNTh08AIEwXFwx.;_ylu=X3oDMTByMG04Z2o2BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw--/RV=2/RE=1402174099/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cbc.ca%2fnews%2fcanada%2fwomen-convicted-of-killing-toronto-police-officer-1.189824/RK=0/RS=4Np4jUK13VPj3pVNypOTBWsEwJo- WWWTT

You edited the comment I responded to. So I will no longer engage in this one. WWWTT

No it's not. It could be self defence. How many cops in this country have walked away free after killing someone with a firearm? I'm sure there are also other cases where people have shot and killed someone in self defence and walked away without any convictions, but I would have to research to back that one. Anyways I'm off to bed and will pick this debate up time permitting. Good night WWWTT

There wasn't an unarmed person shot. Shooting an unarmed person is not the same as shooting an armed person. You can see the difference no? An armed person can shoot you just as you can shoot them. An unarmed person is at a huge disadvantage against an armed person. Shooting an unarmed person is a cowardly act. WWWTT

Unfair comment. I actually contemplated reporting you for writing this! But I would be wrong to. WWWTT

Keep in mind that no civilians died here. This wasn't a school shooting. I think it is safe to say that everyone that was shot, was carrying a firearm. WWWTT

Politically correct?!?!?! That's a freekin spun phrase. Are politicians now the moral standard for everyone to lift themselves up to??? I think in this thread there is media portrait of what happened, and we went against that. WWWTT

That was a long time ago. I actually like BC! After all, he is the senior member on this site and has a vast knowledge of how this forum works and is tactfull! WWWTT

So far they are. They are even making sure that they don't call the accused a "killer" Just playing it safe by drumming up sympathy for the fallen officers. Trying to make them look like innocent regular people as much as they can. Actually they are spending very little time talking about the accused, mostly about the dead cops. WWWTT

Ya I don't bother with that trolling accusation thing anymore. True it is against forum rules, but when posters start accusing others of being a troll, dead ringer evidence that they have run out of debate ammo and are now getting personal. Very poor debating tactic. If it really bothers you, you are supposed to report it and ignore it. Not easy for me to do, but I found it to get easier after the first few times. Don't get discouraged or bullied and good luck debating here. WWWTT

Oh you mean that Polish immigrant that got repeatedly tazered to death out at the Vancouver aeroport by the RCMP? Good thing they were professional RCMP officers that tazered him to death. I would hate to think what would have happened if they were not professionals! WWWTT

Sorry but the PM is a public figure that is not free of criticism. In other words, he is held to a higher standard than Jo Blow or Jane Do. WWWTT

No I wouldn't bet on anything. The last major cop shooting out in Alberta saw the alleged suspect getting popped on the scene. That wasn't the case here so that may or may not indicate that the circumstances are very different? I just hope the judge doesn't put on info ban on this case. WWWTT

No sorry, just piss poor debaters. So to answer your question, ya, it is just you! WWWTT

I don't know? All I know is that 3 cops died and another two were shot and a man is in custody charged with first degree murder and attempt to murder. But the way some people are talking here, they have supper powers to know everything that exactly happened! If I had a supper power to know everything, I would know the winning numbers of the lotto Max instead of what happened in a cop shooting WWWTT

You contradict yourself. So what is it then? Is it up to the courts or is it up to you? WWWTT