Je suis Omar

With all due respect, Michael, I don't think that's possible. You do, at least unconsciously, know how and when it should be used. That is understanding. Adults are a whole lot better at doing language than they are at analyzing it. We learn the vast majority of words and idioms from real life context. Dollars to donuts, I'd say that if you checked a competent dictionary or two, it would match that which you actually comprehend.

Not the least bit serious, Charles. I'm surprised you've even asked. Is there a tongue in cheek emoticon?

You are the one who fled, OGFT. You are the one who is lost. You fled right after you were schooled on your "source". Why do you keep coming back, waving your arms and screaming, "Look at me, I can't even discuss the science!!"

It's a truth that should have been told, strongly and repeatedly long ago. But it should be told for what it really is, the ultimate war crime, the one that contains within all the other evils that flow from it. It is the same supreme war crime for which German Nazis and Japanese were hung. That makes the USA no different than those Nazis. Of course Afghanistan and Iraq aren't the events that make the USA the equivalent of the worst war criminals in history. They were outdoing Hitler long before he was in short pants.

You make a really lame pretence that you are a rule of law guy but that's an absurd notion. Following your line of "reasoning", you give sanction to Panama, Vietnam, Cambodia, Russia, Mexico, Cuba, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Brazil, Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile, Honduras, Haiti, Angola, Laos, Cambodia, and many other nations to attack the USA. Many of those countries have the right to launch multiple attacks. Did you know that the good guys, the USA supported PolPot and the Khmer Rouge?

Of course there won't be war crimes trials against the USA in the place that truly matters because the war criminal nation USA has surrounded itself with junior war criminal supporters. Bush and Cheney were tried and convicted of war crimes in a Malaysian tribunal. Isn't it amazing that there are still brave people in this world? Where do you think the missing Malaysian airliner is?

You come here, repeatedly make a fool of yourself, by failing to address the bogus issues you raise, you disappear then reappear to once again make a fool of yourself and on and on it goes. Why are you so unwilling to discuss the science, OGFT? It's down to 21% and shrinking. These are folks who haven't been exposed. You know the lies but still you frantically work to protect your right to maintain your ignorance.

I think we've seen some of that 21% here at MLW.

Of course I knew. Right wing nut cases have been harping on it since forever.

I don't think that it's a small event to those that were shot, or their families, either. I just wonder how you can ignore the slaughter of millions by the USA. If you want to discuss something you disagree with, address it directly and honestly. Don't just snipe from widely dispersed posts.

Your appalling and shameful ignorance.

I guess Clinton figured that his country still needed their ally, Osama bin Laden, to help them with their dirty work.

Then one has to wonder why you get your panties in a wad about these relatively small events.

No, Argus, those are Ronald Reagan's beloved Contras, the equivalent of the Founding Fathers according to Reagan. And Reagan was right, those founding fathers were pretty much as vicious and brutal as the Contras. Nice bunch you hang around with.

Just a short bit to illustrate just how ignorant (non-pejorative sense) you are about USA history. But do read the rest, Argus. Then you can start a new thread and we can discuss it.

The ultimate extremist position would be that of those who support and defend the ultimate terrorist group in the world. The US of A.

Yes, as Good Americans.

And you ignored this; But you never wonder about what Nicaraguans or Vietnamese or Koreans or Filipinos did to incense the USA so badly that they slaughtered millions.

So slashing off a woman's breasts is, according to your moral dictates, a good example of USA rule of law. And peeling the skin off the face of a father in front of their children, or doing the same to the children also qualifies as USA rule of law. Is that just you or are your parents responsible for that?

Great memes but they are really getting old. You keep forgetting that the USA is the leading terrorist group on the planet, with deaths from their terrorist actions far far far outnumbering all the other "terrorist" actions combined. How come the USA didn't attack Saudi Arabia? There's still some of the purported 9/11 "terrorist hijacked" alive and well living there.

Could you have someone edit your responses for you?

If someone attempted this type of base humour right after 911, using those victims as the butt of a cruel joke, how many barrels do you think they would have received? Verbal barrels of course.

But you never wonder about what Nicaraguans or Vietnamese or Koreans or Filipinos did to incense the USA so badly that they slaughtered millions.

Speaking about acting like savages, are you aware of the numbers of Iraqis and afghans killed by the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? What about this? Do you consider this to be savagery? "I don't mean to abuse you with verbal violence, but you have to understand what your (USA) government and its agents are doing. They go into villages, they haul out families. With the children forced to watch they castrate the father, they peel the skin off his face, they put a grenade in his mouth and pull the pin. With the children forced to watch they gang-rape the mother, and slash her breasts off. And sometimes for variety, they make the parents watch while they do these things to the children." --John Stockwell

Some very interesting poll results and other salient comments. Everything below the line is from, http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/poll-more-americans-believe-world-trade-center-7-was-demolished-on-911-than-believe-the-governments-explanation.html Feel free to add your own sources. --------------------------------- According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), normal office fires caused the failure of a single column, starting a chain reaction that brought Building 7 down. More than 2,000 architects and engineers have signed the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition that questions NISTs explanation of the buildings collapse. "Even the governments own computer model disproves its theory. It looks nothing like the actual collapse," said Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer from the Philadelphia area. "Not only that, they refuse to release the data that would allow us to verify their model. In the world of science, this is as bad as it gets. I'm glad most people can look at the collapse and see the obvious." //////////// On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the governments account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11. The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11? Among the polls findings: 38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it; 46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7s collapse, only 19% know the buildings name; After seeing video footage of Building 7′s collapse: 46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 27% who dont know; [in other words, more people think controlled demolition than believe the governments narrative] By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7′s collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.