Je suis Omar

The following is typical of USA actions against the poor of the world.

Chirping is your province, Rue. If you can't figure it out from Chomsky and Zinn's quotes, then I can't help you.

All Good Germans.

Notice how spare you are on sources and how high you are on speculation, "might"? As you said, Sharkman, talk is cheap.

Clearly, you "dunno", BlackDog. But that has been apparent for some time.There was ample evidence of both molten steel and molten iron, including the connection between the two, reported in the source I directed you to. You either haven't read it or, alternately, your intent here is to illustrate that you really do lack the necessary understanding of the issues and the science surrounding 911 to engage in these discussions. But don't let that discourage you. The issues are complex and the science is too. Keep at it. There's a saying, that goes People believe the official story because they don't know the official story. Once people do learn the truth, they then really do understand.

Could you define "cite" so we can be sure you are familiar with the implications?

Yup, no sources again for how many posts? However, it must be noted that you have the memes nailed, Argus.

Argus: Name me one democracy with gay rights,m women's rights and even animal-rights which has been surrounded by enemies and subjected to constant violent attacks, invasions and terrorism without pause for fifty years. ---------------------- Cuba, Vietnam, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Korea, the list is rather long.

Sorry, folks, I bumped the wrong button. But I dutifully backspaced every Argus meme so that you didn't have to not read them again.

Can you say lame, Argus? But yet a smart fella like you clings to these inanities. Go figure! I think everyone is impressed at your deft handling of difficult issues. I guess Omar Sharif and Omar Bradeley are supporters of terrorism, too.

You might want to note that there aren't any folks leaping to support you, BlackDog. I already provided proof of molten steel and molten iron at the WTC site and in the dust, at least twice. Do any of you read anything at all? You seem to be cut from the same cloth as those of Intelligent Design. Okay, one more time. Read it all, BlackDog, it presents both sides. http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/

Aaaaah, the part that BD did post and I referenced, which made you feel uncomfortable enough to pretend to come clean. And what, you didn't read it, or you were just happy with the volume of distractions he was posting? I know you've been lurking, so how have you missed it that OGFT tried this same NIST nonsense, again, old outdated material that has been addressed by scientists who showed that NIST's contentions were wrong. Many of NIST's contentions have been wrong and they have had to make retractions. I provided, in this thread, not so many posts ago, scientific evidence that refuted NIST and OGFT. The latter disappeared. The thread went into a period of quiescence. If you insist, I'll be more than happy to present that again. But, now, how is it possible for the impossible to happen? There was no legimate, legal fuel source available at the WTC complex that would create molten steel or molten iron. They were found to exist at the WTC complex. Is this another water into wine miracle? That really would be American exceptionalism reaching a god like stage.

I'm sorry but that is lunacy, Eyeball. You don't let folks who have no interest in discussing science knock people off open, free discussions on science. That is completely antithetical not only to freedom of speech but also to science. You only have to note how frightened they become the more is the focus on the science. You only have to note how they present volumes of everything under the Sun, except the science. You only have to note their reliance on the official myths, where some out of ignorance, cling to them and others, less honest, keep throwing them up to divert the discussion. There has been no scientific explanation from official sources for the presence of the molten steel and iron found at the WTC complex, except for one, the residue of thermitic material, which, I shouldn't have to explain, didn't/doesn't belong there.

To save you some embarrassment, Did BlackDog's post contain the material from the morass of material you mistakenly wanted me to wade thru and find for you? Didn't I just a short time ago, today, read a post of yours wherein you told someone it was their duty to provide from their source/their link?

I see that we've once again arrived at the pulling teeth stage where you get all cagey with your responses, Michael. And I reiterate, Why are you so obviously reluctant to specifically discuss these issues?

Go ahead and shoot this down, OGFT. Or should we just note that you already attempted to try that earlier in this thread, using a source you couldn't explain and that was out of date. And your silly notions about the molten metal being aluminum WERE shot down, in flames, ... big ones. And neither you or Michael seem to be honest enough to inform BlackDog of that. That's because your ideas of "discussing the science" include supporting those who bombard the thread with extraneous material to help obfuscate. You probably don't even look at each other's posts. If you did, and if you possessed a scintilla of honesty you would have reminded BlackDog that we have been over this before and that you, OGFT, studiously ignored it after you quickly hit your self erected brick wall.

As did I, in the post three before this post of yours I've quoted. Notice how I posted direct, focused discussion of the particular issue under discussion while you gave a link to a huge mishmash of matter totally unrelated to the issue at hand. Was Eyeball accurate in an overall sense and also, prescient?

Which you are obviously reluctant to discuss. That would be the same video evidence that NIST made use of, is it not?

So go ahead and discuss it yourself, Michael. What are you afraid of, Eyeball's observation? Isn't that what the moderators want?

You're right. Isn't that thee most unscientific thing you've ever heard of? Talk about making gigantic assumptions!!! That's hardly scientific. But someone as eminently qualified as you, BD, should know that. Yes, I'm well aware of what NIST did, the gigantic assumptions they made. Three buildings, all on the same day, brought down by fire when no other country has ever been able to accomplish even one collapse, even after having fires burn for many more hours than the relatively small fires on 911. This is obviously American exceptionalism at work.

So go ahead and discuss it, Michael.

Then why your incredible reluctance to discuss the evidence, Michael?

Because the question, below, was asked of Michael. Your comprehension skills also seem to require some attention. Je suis Omar, on 13 May 2015 - 11:12 AM, said: Michael, why was there molten steel and iron in the three buildings when there was no fuel source that could have created molten steel and iron?

Exactly, hence my pointed response to you. Which I must reiterate. You are all over the map, BD. Your lack of focus needs attention.

WTC2 South Tower on 9/11 Molten Metal North-East Corner