JerrySeinfeld

I'm surmising here, but I would think the catholic church is pro erection, since they are pro life. Am i missing something here?

Nothing duffs. The enriched uranium needs a catalyst to become a bomb. And it's not an explosion.

Obama is anti Israel. Plain and simple. we all know it. In his little world he could not give two shits about whether or not Iran nukes Israel.

Forgive me, but what the h*ll are you even talking about? Have you considered, for even one minute, that this is a huge world full of a**holes? No. of course not. everything in your mind is western centric.

we should all publish this movie, everyday, forever. who cares if you're "trying". these people are monkeys. apes. they raped western women in the square even during the revolution. animals.

the aspirin works. no question. or she could use a tylenol too. you deny this? what is this of boner pills? I don't want any boner pills at all. but if i did, I certainly wouldn't go up in front of 30 million people demanding someone else pay for them. why? because I am a grown adult. really. what self respecting man would stand up in front of the country asking for boner pills? would you?...actually, forget it. you're a lib, of course you would.

You are correct. It's funny how warmongers skirt right over the cause nowadays and get right to the warmth. Rule number one in a liberal mind: western society is to blame. What a shitty way to live life. always negative and angry at such a great society. yuck. get real.

Yep. it was (and is) awesome. Only in a lonely and poor world like yours could someone find academia as solace for failure. I'm rich, you are poor. Sorry 'bout your luck. But it certainly explains your politics.

Haha you eat McDonalds for breakfast eh? that says about all we need to know.

SPeaking of stock trading - millions bought Facebook too.

The sad part is, Obama sold us on the idea that we should put our emphasis on diplomacy rather than guns. This is a poor commentary on Obama, because embassies are supposed to be his strong suit.

Why do liberals always go so ad hominem on conservatives? Just argue the point, or is your point so weak? Liberals are like children or women: irrational anger. Conservatives are generally smart people with a more independent viewpoint on the world. Yet some people would have us all believe they are evil demons who are racist.

No they shouldn't invade Iran, they should blow the shit out of their nuclear sites with airstrikes.

How is spending more money good for the deficit? Only in a democrat mind.

Aren't they? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2007/06/30/bce-teachers.html People own corporations. Mom and dad. Teachers. Firefighters. Families. Millions of people (most people) work within corporations. Most peoples' retirement owns corporations. So how do corporations not consist of people? I kind of feel sorry for you. You are so lost, you are so angry at corporations and stuff. Occupy guy are we? It's tough being poor, but really the answer isn't anger and envy and resentment. Just get up and do something. Create something. Work. You would be surprised and amazed at what can come if you just stop being angry at other peoples' success and just start building your own. I wish you luck. But I believe you are too far down in the pit of envy.

Liberals are liberals because it FEELS good. Not because it IS good. Once you realize that being a liberal has more to do with feelings than facts, you understand much about how they view the world. Remember, liberals are mommy. Republicans are daddy. And since liberals are more feminine, they believe that HOW THEY FEEL entitles them to act in certain ways. Why do you think society always excuses womens' behavior. WOman throws a drink in a man's face? "what did HE do to deserve it". Woman slaps a man? Same thing. Woman kills her kids? must've been a provocation or mental troubles. Now turn the tables: if a man throws a drink in a woman's face, he is held responsible for his actions. same goes for hitting a woman. same goes for killing people. This is the parallel to the liberal knee jerk reaction to muslim outrage and violence: they view muslims the same way society views women: incapable of controlling their behavior because they were overcome by emotion. Essentiall the liberal view is racist: "those dumb brown people don't have the same capacity to control their rage the same way us white liberals do."

This is bullshit. Bill Maher insults religion all the time. Works of art depicting peeing on Jesus happen all the time. Passion of the Christ insulted Christian groups. The problem is, pretty much everything insults Islam. There was a Muslim man in ENgl;and who threatened and caused burger king to change the chocolate swirl on top of their ice cream cone because it resembled the Arabic symbol for allah. Then there was the threat against the adult shop for having a blow up doll named "Mustafa Shag". Strange, you'd think people would be more concerned about real men named Mustafa blowing up, but I digress And funny you couldn't even get a single liberal up in arms about someone else trying to mess with a sex shop. Sexual liberty is the only kind of liberty a liberal will stand up for. To hell with the first amendment, I need my shaggin'. LOL! Your reaction is the exact opposite of what should be happening. Filmmakers and reporters are always patting themselves on the back about being "brave" and "transgressive". Well here it is: real bravery would involve every media outlet on the planet airing this movie. Not because it is good, but because it represents the opposite of cowering in the corner, announcing to Islam that all you have to do is blow something up and we will all cow tow to your vision of the world: a world that never insults the prophet. They have blasphemy laws in places in this world, countries where insulting Allah is off limits: they're called Saudi Arabia. Now we may have "freedom of speech" de jure in this country, but if you are going to let some piss ant Muslims intimidate everything you publish, then you don't have freedom of speech de facto, and you may as well be in Saudi Arabia. Look at the Times Square Viacom attempt: mad at "Southpark" for the muhammed bear thing. This is the problem with liberals, and they're too dumb to realize they're doing it. They pretend to be all "freedom of artistic integrity" until it's something that they don't like. Liberals didn't like Clint's awesome mockery of Obama in the empty chair, so they dragged it through the mud. "You can't make fun of Obama!!!" Same goes for Muslims. But Jesus is OK. It's a tricky double standard. The bottom line? If it doesn't agree with their worldview, it's just not funny. It's OK to tell a catholic university like Georgetown to do things it finds religiously unconscionablee, but never ever make a film that insults the prophet Muhammed. Got it? See it now? LOL!! Maybe if the Catholics started blowing people up the liberals would have an ear for them. :lol: See how stupid these people are? Basically encouraging violence to get your point across.

The Dems have started ahead since California and New York became reliable Dem states, yet it hasn't always turned out that way.

Falling into the trap. People are people.

And in typical lib fashion, when called on his "logic", he instinctively spouts the word "Paul Ryan" as defence. Or "Bush did it!!!"

[/size] don't be so hard on yourself! Yes, I quoted your post... and also viewed it in relation to the OP intent/focus on personal versus leaders (government) accountability. Your solution want rubs up against a leadership void... rather, an obstructionist Harper Conservative government that, quite clearly, does not recognize or value science/scientists, at large, or more specifically does not acknowledge climate change and the mostly negative impacts it is and will bring directly to Canadians. Here on MLW, we've had no shortage of "solution focused" discussion aimed toward working to manage the affects of climate change following a three-fold emphasis on mitigation, adaptation and prevention. Invariably, this also rubs up against the TimG types who may even offer-up token concern troll acceptance to AGW/CC... while they either emphasize the improbabilities of doing "anything", or they shift to a delay at all costs mode while emphasizing adaption... and only adaption... as the only viable 'solution' approach. Again - do nothing... and if you really must do something, if you're really, really, really going to force something be done, then... it can only be reactionary and only in an adaptive manner. Mitigation? Bah... the TimG's say that's heresy! That will mess with BigOil profits, don't ya know! ahh yes. "big oil". :lol: :lol:

What you "know" is that if a woman "provokes" rape by wearing certain clothing, then she deserves it. This is precisely the same logic you are using: it's not the attacker's fault - it's the person being attacked. Sick man, you are.

Wow. This statement truly betrays how out of touch you are. Thousands of women worldwide in rape crisis centres suffer this exact same accusation on a daily basis, which is why so many are afraid to come forward: it's their fault. Your statement is sickening.

Someone who has produced more jobs and wealth than you will ever see in your life. Hey but at least you believe "better things" than the rest of us - here in the productive class, eh?

Yes. yes he is. It doesn't take much imagination to stick with the consensus and say "Obama is going to win". But then again, that's not the topic of this thread now, is it?