JerrySeinfeld

Ah yes, the infamous "unnamed Romney advisor" of Associated Press and Reuters fame. :lol: Romney is in the right here - nobody should be talking about the provocation. It steers the debate in the wrong direction. As a free nation, people are free to say what they want. Period. It's the FIRST amendment. Nobody in the government - Obama's government - should be scolding anybody in their own country about proper speech codes. It reeks of 1984 or Nazi Germany or, well, Obama's white house. Romney is correct - condemn the attacks outright. And it took his leadership to drag Obama's reluctant absolution into the limelight. The middle east is a mess. Syria is in flames. Iran is on the verge of a nuclear bomb and threatening Israel. The Obama Netenyahu relationship is more than strained, the muslim brother hood is in power in Egypt and US embassies are literally burning to the ground. 1979 anyone? This guy is an incompetent boob.

No we're not. Go ahead, have all the sex you want. Nobody is stopping you. Don't get your tights all into a know just because you have a uterus. And don't go hat in' on men because you do. Get onto mother nature or god or whoever, but your biological reality is what it is. accept it! Really. It's gonna be ok. Or better yet, just <ahem> man up, and pony up the $9 bucks sister.

The Democrat party has a vested interested in moving voters into blocks - "groups". Conservatives see no colour. We see liberty, small government and freedom. That's good for everybody. AN evaporation of voting "groups" means the democrats never win another election...ever.

Good for them! Now more sex for men.

So the USA should ban religiously offensive movies? If not, what;'s your point.

That's completely correct. Isn't it fun being attacked on all sides by liberals, Shady? Liberals need to stick their head in the sand about the consequences of the post american Carter-esque dreamworld they're trying to create by peeing on the GOP. Reality hurts.

People are responsible for their behavior. This is nobody's fault, except the persons who committed the crimes.

Hey dude, I'm not the one who supoprts the party that makes campaign and gov't policy geared toward this.

Watch and learn:

Watch and learn:

"women's health issues" LOL!!

I don't want viagra covered either. But it's a lot easier to make the argument that Viagra cures a medical problem, than it is to make the argument that pregnancy is a medical problem. Some women (and men) just don't like accepting the biological realities of life, so they try to place the "medical problem" label on abortion and contraception to avoid talking the truth: that some 31 year old child wants nanny state to pay for her sex life. This isn't a men versus women issue. It's a state intervention issue: the more stuff the governments makes sure you don't have to pay for (whether by dircet payment or by decree), the less personal resposibility you have for your own actions and behaviors, the better off the Democrats are. Obama loves to say "hey if you vote for those guys they'll take away (insert government benefit here)?" And what bigger voting block than 50% of the population to play this little game with.

Erectile Dysfunction is a medical problem. Pregnancy is not.

so? you call a guy a slut you don't see him getting his tights all in a knot now do you?

I really hope that come November a good chunk of Obama supporters think that way too.

That's a reasonable point. It's a much better argument than the "women should force catholic institutions to pay for something that's against their conscience" dribble that Fluke trots, out.

If you don't ant to get pregnant, buy some birth control or don't have sex. Plenty of choices. Why should anybody else pay for your sex life. Guys buy their own condoms.

"Medication"? :lol: :lol:

Yep. That's how Dems need the world to be. They benefit from division.

Yea. Prince charles famously said we have until 2017. That's only about four years away!!! :lol:

Fantasy eh? These guys have been right since 1980.

Ya the blacks, the jews, what's the difference, right Bleeding Heart? You said it. Not me.

Yes. The matter of the $9. You know, her pocketbook, to use your word. The word you claimed this isn't about.

Hey bub, you're betting with conventional wisdom - good for you! Way to go out on a limb. I started this thread because I believe there are many factors that are not being given much weight. It's common political warfare to try to "enhance" the public's perception of your guy's lead to dishearten the opposition. As for negative ads, I just about fell off my chair hearing that complaint from an Obama supporter. :lol:

OK I see a confused person who sees the word "black" and starts talking about jews. Pity to see the world with such a bigoted lens.