monty16

Rules I have missed but to which I have just recently been iinformed. And rules that I think make a lot of sense and should be adhered to by all members from now on in a strict manner. DO NOT THINK OF THE NAMES OF YOUR FELLOW MEMBERS AS YOU READ THE POSTS IN A DISCUSSION. THINK OF EVERY SINGLE POST AS IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHO WROTE IT. Let there be no mistake of where the guilt lies for breaking the rules and let there be no mistake that a breach of the rules should be reported! Then there will be no ambiguity on whether or not the guilty parties are being punished for such bad behaviour. I'm with the moderator team 100% on this one!

http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/08/26/us-supported-iraqs-use-of-chemical-weapons-even -as-it-inches-to-war-with-Syria-on-lesser-allegations And again antiwar.com blows the whistle on US crimes against humanity. One of the big problems in the US is that some of them are willing to be honest if it's going to gain them in their domestic politics. Hence, the Dems tell on the Repubs and vice versa. This whistle blowing becomes apparent with every war the US starts. When it was Kosovo, the rabid right was totally united in condemning that war as nothing but a war of aggression by Clinton. And when it becomes Obama's plan to have a war they are again against it. But when Bush1 started the Gulf war, the complaining came from the Dem side. Having said that, there's always going to be relative ease of getting enough of the other side to get on board with a war. And so, with the supplying of chem/bio warfare agents to Saddam, CIA agent Stephen Pelletiere blew the whistle on that issue. The use of gas by Saddam had to be either a case of Iran using the gas or if Iraq used it then it had to be supplied by the US.

On Guard for thee, You're referring to me when you mention the 'RT crap' and that's against the rules. You must look at each post as if you aren't aware of 'who' wrote the post and treat it accordingly. In this case you have clearly started thinking about attacking me.These are the preferred rules as stated by our moderator(s) and I think that if everyone adheres to them we'll have a better forum. Thanks for your understanding!

Who are you addressing b_c? Me? If so then you need to know that you must not address me specifically and you must address every post as if you aren't aware of who wrote that post. Stop the personal attacks agains me. Thanks!

The US stockpiles and supplies other countries with the biggest and most evil weapons of mass destruction known to man. While at the same time pretending that weapons that are not frequently used in their arsenal of death and destruction become WMD's. These are invariably weapons that are of little use to the US because of their lack of effectiveness and lack of ability to kill hundreds or sometimes thousands of victims in one attack. In truth, a weapon of mass destruction is a weapon that is capable of causing mass destruction. It doesn't get anymore straight forward than that. And so, by an extension of logic, the US is the country that is most guilty of the use of weapons of mass destruction. And that by logical extension of the argument, leads us back to the reason why ISIS is intent in forming an Islamic state in the ME. Islam will attempt to consolidate itself in order to fight back against US aggression. with......................... their own weapons of mass destruction. Only complete fools would continue to align ourselves with the US and the only fools are those who let Harper align Canada with US evil which motivates entities such as ISIS..

There was no criminal intent and so the woman should at most receive a warning and maybe a little community service. It also serves as a warning to all those who drive motorcycles that they need to be extra vigilant of the dangers of the road. I speak from experience. We must not get over anxious of following the Conservative party's lead of punishing all instances of man slaughter or murder or other crimes with a prescribed and predetermined punishment which forces judges into being overly harsh. Conservatism and Harper's party's sick mindset has nothing to do with socially responsible government and correct reaction of the law to this sort of instance. In fact, it's no exaggeration to say that many of them would bring back capital punishment to Canada and make an example of this lady by executing her for her crime. Indeed, if the Cons had their way, the judge would have no choice! Canada is a socially responsible country and must stay so. Therein again lies the reason why we must get rid of Harper and his evil gang of wanna be Americans. WE Canadians don't ever want to contemplate US style justice against a woman who felt compassion for mammals in danger on the road. Perhaps also an acceptance of herself being no different in many ways as members of the animal kingdom. Another form of compassion that is lacking in the US and among conservative extremists such as Harper's followers.

Good stuff Waldo. But of course the reason why Canadians are interested in the topic is because we need to be proactive. We must stop Harper from turning Canada into what the US has become.

Gosthacked, Policing in Canada is entirely differenct from in the land of the gun. In that country nearly everybody who walks the street has a gun in his pocket, his shoe, behind his/her ear, in her/purse, in his/her nose, or wherever. Canada is entirely different and there is consequently no need for police to be more heavily armed than they already are. Of course we have to take into consideration Harper's attempts to turn Canada into a country full of gungoons so everything could change. The reason for carrying a gun is more cowardice than anything else. A coward, or an American, can make himself immune to getting a slap in the face for being rude by having the threat of a gun in his pocket. This is obviously the mentality of people such as Harper who was most likely slapped around and bullied by his school companions for being a little boy who wouldn't and couldn't take part in normal play with other children. THeir habit of hiding behind mommy's apron was carried into adulthood and is easily identifiable. Look for the characteristic in those who support lots of guns, we generally find that it's more a personal thing with them because of a childhood background of not fitting in which led to being bullied, which in turn led to cowardice, which in turn led to needing a "big" friend by their side at all times. The big frience being the gun, the extension of their bodies. The problem could have been nipped in the bud in childhood by a few good cuffs behind their ear by another child, which would have caused them to stand up like men. This is a conspicuously present attribute of most conservatives. They're bullied in their opinions but they bring the bullying on quite consciously and deliberately because they know they are safe with their guns. (or any other entity or mechanism that takes the place of their gun when the gun won't protect their sensitivities) And all that leads to the definite conclusion: We must stop Harper before he turns Canada into another 'land of the gun' and land of the coward who advocates carrying them around in a normal peaceful society such as Canada.

Does this mean you're going to start ignoring the Zionist liars who practice apartheid against the Palestinian people? (this is addressed to all forum participants who do just that, with the exception of the one who is trying to stir the pot.)(that one would be the one who I consistently ignore but am unable to mention by name) LOL

On guard, the US is pretty well undecided on which faction to support in both Iraq and Syria. So that makes them all 'sort ofs'. 'Subconsciously may not have been entirely correct but there's little doubt that the US is aware of it going down a oneway road with it's fight against Islam and so-called terrorism. The time is coming soon when the US will start to recognize that support of Israel and wars for oil are just not worth it anymore. In fact, I think there are lots of indications that Obama has already reached that point. but as Canadians, who cares? What is most important is that Canada separates itself from US aggression that is going to result in another bigtime terrorist attack. This time in the 'form of a nuclear cloud' as Condo Rice says. Canada still doesn't need to be a part of that. Getting rid of Harper is the key. Because if we don't then Harper is going to give Canada the image of just being a part of US aggression and crimes against humanity in the ME. Appreciate that you understand that Harper is going to be the downfall of Canada though.

eyeball, It's more important how it's perceived by the global community. Propaganda can only serve a limited purpose and then it finally breaks down and the people start to look at the real facts. That's why the Zionist regime is so worried about it's image in the world. Their biggest apolgists, the US, have lost a lot of their image of taking the high road since the phony Iraq war. Issues such as torture by their military to gain access to information, torture at Abu Ghraib, and torture at Guantanamo, as well as illegal detention at Guantanamo, is wearing their good image very thin. Russia and China will play to that in their quest to be seen as the morally good and correct. The important message is, don't worry about what you think as much as what the rest of the world thinks.

And gosthacked, you also need to make it clear to the Americans that we know they didn't believe that Saddam had the WMD's all along. Some people excuse their Nazi tactics by claiming they didn't know and couldn't take a chance. But then, if you continue to sympathize with the Zionists, there's little point in tryinig to convince you of anything. Sure wish you would get over your stubbornness and clare that one up!

I like how you are able to group all people from certain countries as unlikable TSS. Tell us how you do that! I've never found Finns to be unlikable but I'm sure there are a few in every country. So how do you like black people? Are they all the same to you? And what colour people are all good in your opinion?

On guard, you're obviously confused because Vancouver island and Victoria is on the island but they are not the same as Great Britain island.

gosthacked, then it's settled!l You are joining the pond scum and going with Zionist supporters. And all you had to do was deny you are supporting Zionist religious hate all along. Maybe I've got you wrong gosthacked, maybe you could clear this up in a second by just saying that you don't support that kind of pond scum evil? Ya think? Otherwise, I'm just going to leave it with you as settled.

I can't quote you gosthacked but I'm sure there are hundreds of instances where you have supported Zionist evil. But look, if you haven't then just say so, otherwise you are guilty as charged. Why are you being devious about this? So simple to deny! LOL And hey pal, if you deny it then I'll believe you and that's the end of it!

gosthacked, that isn't an attempt to censor others, that's your fantasy maybe. What it really is is my opinion that we don't need to attack the Americans for their lack of elementary geography knowledge. They have their own country to think about. Did you really think I was trying to shut people up? If so and you think it's a crime of something then why not report it as such. And if not then let me stoop to the level of which your accusing me right now! Shut up your personal attacks on me for your entertainment or just put up. Your choice friend. Your worthless babbling aside!

http://rt.com/news/170656-police-brutality-palestine-youth/ Nazis caught beating up 15 year old Palestinian youth. No wait, it's not Nazis, it just looks like Nazis. gosthacked, I've got your right and that's the reason you won't deny it. You've consistently defended the Zionists in my opinion. Say it ain't so pal!

Gosthacked, Not until you come out and declare what you are trying to do. If you're happy with the tag I stuck on you then relax. If not then deny it. Don't bother me with details when you're promoting the confusion yourself. Or if at any time you want to get serious and have a proper conversation then I'll help you.

The US didn't plan 9/11 but there's little doubt that it ensured that something of the nature would eventually happen in revenge for what they did in the ME. And of course the support of the evil Saudi monarchy which Osama opposed. So maybe the US subconsciously planned it? In any case, it's hard to separate the good guys from the bad guys as it progresses along. Syria and Iraq are now full of 'sort of good guys' and 'sort of bad guys'? If only we could stop Harper from making us a part of it!

Ghosthacked. O.k. then, for a minute there I thought you were pointing out the lies of the Zionists but now I see that you are apologizing for them. Just getting our ducks in a line ya know.

jacee, Most companies and a good deal of industriy train apprentices at zero expense. They get the cheap labour of the apprentice and get rid of them before they become journeymen. Very few still pay their apprentices to go to school. As a former employer of skilled tradesmen I've been in a position to know how the system was abused. I'll stand toe to toe with anybody who wants to debate those facts but I won't do it with lying swine who have no interest in improving the system but only an interest in spreading lies to increase profit of it's ilk. Where's the expense? Don't let the liars lie to you without holding their feet to the fire.

What are you trying to do Ghosthacked, point out the lies of the Zionists or point out their brutality against the Palestinian people?

My opinion is that attacking Americans on the basis of the topic of this thread is just a cheap shot. We have lots of much more legitimate issues to attack them over. Don't let this become a diversion from the real task at hand.

WestCoastRunner, What are you thinking? This is all about Hilary Clinton and has nothing to do with judges and presidents. The only thing simple here is your thinking. Try to understand what people are talking about.