Leaderboard

Says the crazy old bat associating herself with a violent criminal organization which is inciting mayhem and murder in the streets. They're not freedom fighters, they are violent criminals, I'd stay away from them If I were you, you could yourself in a jackpot too.

That was my club. I was surprised too. The club feature gives me the ability to reverse the decision. I thought about that, and decided not to. Your suspicion someone was a paid shill does not excuse your harassment of them. For the record, I disagree with your assessment. I've seen nothing to indicate the individual isn't real. They don't act like someone scripted, they just have different views than you do (something you have grown increasingly less tolerant of). They have, btw, emailed me a couple of times, not pushing a viewpoint but asking for clarification on political issues. This is not the behaviour of a paid shill. I generally allow people to curse each other out and cast insults freely and I don't believe I've ever actually deleted anything over it, even when they're insulting me. But when you're essentially repeatedly attacking someone who has done nothing to deserve it, who has posted politely and without insults I think you're being a dick. And when it's someone new that's even worse. So argue your point and stop acting like a dick.

Dunno. I come from a time when men didn't cry in public for any reason. Now we got this guy who seems to cry constantly and he somehow still has tons of fans.

It will continue to collapse, it's getting worse all the time The latest is that they have banned the annual church parades for the regiments here in Ontario, lest the Mooslambs be offended. It's degenerating further into leftist absurdity and picking up pace with the rest of the commie government.

But the GOP relies far more on Trump to pass legislation and stack the courts to last far longer than his term(s) in office. It takes a 2/3rds majority to convict, so the GOP will continue to support Trump until it threatens their members/hold on the Senate. Not necessarily...Trump has no love for Iran's autocratic leadership. And it makes sense that Trump favours transactional leaders over career politicians. FDR also liked authoritarian leaders...like Mussolini. Also, U.S. foreign policy got into bed with many dictators over the years, for many U.S. presidents, not just Trump.

Seems like that if it happened to Trump, certain folks would be screaming about election meddling.

A 'do-nothing' President endorsing a 'dip-shit' PM . . . . . are they blood relatives ?

Considering that many women are abandonned and have already one or many other kids they barely or can't provide support, abortions is also an effective solution but, I admit it is not necessarly constructive without proper education. What disgusts me is, if you just blow the dust off the surface, you will see the corruption and how the money is redirected into other interests. How much of that money really goes to the ones in need? It's surprising how big is the leak.

Nazis? More recently, I've considered how it is that China become such an economic powerhouse, and the answer is quite simply, the USA. Or maybe it was Bill Clinton. Below is part of a post I made elsewhere, and edited it somewhat for this thread. In the early 90's China started welcoming American companies into China to build factories and set up manufacturing, and everybody involved made tons of money, and you had to ask yourself, why was China suddenly allowing this? And was Clinton a genius? Fast forward 20 years, and it becomes clear that China was allowing this so that they could appropriate all kinds of tech, manufacturing know-how, and industry for themselves without actually having to develop it out of nothing like the rest of the world did. Stealing tech, selling counterfeit products, supporting North Korea's nuclear ambitions, these were all warning signs that the rest of the world ignored until it started biting them in the ass, and at that point it was too late.Oh, and by the way, looks like they are going to get a "better grip" on Hong Kong, is Taiwan next? Also, in their tariff response to the US, they are specifically targeting swing states that Trump could lose. How's that for interfering in an election? If we didn't like Russian interference, we shouldn't like this, or else we are hypocrites. In reality, there is nothing that can be done about Hong Kong unless war is on the table, and it's not. The US has been scared of China since Viet Nam, and China has gotten slightly more dangerous since then. They are going to do whatever the hell they feel like now, and nobody will do anything about it. And you can thank Bill Clinton, George Bush and Obama for doing absolutely nothing about it as the storm clouds started forming. Trump is too late, but at least he's forced China to reveal some of their ambitions.

Big deal. Almost all the fentanyl on our streets comes from China. The Chinese put no restrictions on its creation or export, despite repeated requests from the West. China does nothing that it doesn't see as benefiting it, and it's making money off fentanyl. It could care less how many westerners die. The only way to start to get control of fentanyl is to punish China for its export.