Leaderboard

Why is it conservative women excusing men who commit sexual assault? I think if you're honest, you'll see that women of all political leanings do that. I'm not going to get into Ellison, Clinton, Kennedy, Jackson etc., but c'mon, supporting sex offenders is not exclusive to any one group of women. Also, who exactly are you referring to? If there was a dime's worth, or an ounce of evidence against Kavanaugh, he'd be done, instead he'll be a supreme court judge. Why don't you ever wonder about feminist women supporting women in obvious false allegations. That seems to be more pervasive and dangerous than anything else. Remember when liberals would say things like "better to free 10 men than wrongly convict one"? Now it's literally, "If a few innocent men go down, that's a price we'll accept".

The “details” are never insignificant when something happens that’s significant enough to trigger ptsd. On the car ride home, was she feeling shame or fear or loathing and was she wondering who she could tell or what they would think/do? If she walked home, traumatized, that would be another thing she would remember. Was there someone with her that made her feel safe or was she running and hiding in fear? When she ran to the bathroom didn’t they run after her? Did they say things through the door? Did she stay in there for a really long time thinking they might still be outside? Did she tell her best friend, or if she didn’t why not? The need to talk to someone about it would have been huge. If she didn’t talk about it then the internal pressure to get it off her chest would have been enormous. She would also feel like she needed to tell her friends to help keep them safe. Despite all that she told no one, and didn’t think about it enough to remember much of it. But let’s be real, these aren’t things that she would forget anyways. Dan you’re saying that he should admit to something that, according to every shred of evidence that’s in, never happened. It’s something that would destroy his reputation and cost him a job that he worked all his life for. Is that even a real thing? To make a false confession just because it’s easier than telling the truth, while knowing that it costs you everything? You assume he lied multiple times because that’s what CNN said, but you should know by now that CNN has no relationship with the truth whatsoever. If you pay close attention you can see that they are always spinning stories all the time, when they’re not telling outright lies or ignoring pertinent details because “they don’t fit our narrative.” THEY EVEN LIE AND SPIN THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DAMN WEATHER! Anderson Cooper stands in the ditch to make a foot of flood water seem like 4 feet. Then they say that America needs to stop burning coal because of global warming.... What I just said is 100% true and easily verifiable if you would like me to show you links. So now YOU KNOW they are liars. Have you ever heard the saying “Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me?” How many times will you let CNN dupe you before you ditch them? Donna Brazile was working for CNN when she gave debate questions to Hillary. Their own Van Jones was caught on hidden video saying that Trump-Russia collusion is just a big nothingburger about a year ago but on camera it’s still very real baby. They know that Obama’s government locked kids apart from their families but they still say “Trump’s policy of separating kids from their families”. CNN kicked off their coverage of the Michael Brown shooting by saying that a policeman just drove up and shot him from inside his car while he was doing nothing, in front of “hundreds of witnesses”. Then they said that it was irresponsible to show video of MB committing a violent robbery moments earlier. Then when the truth came out about the whole story CNN kept plugging the story along as if it happened just the way that they initially reported it. CNN blames the pulse nigt club shooting on guns and the NRA, but AK47’s are illegal and alah_ _____ isn’t an NRA slogan. Honestly quoting CNN is a non-starter for any reasonable conversation.

Good point. People who really want to lower the boom on Kavanaugh based on such a seemingly bogus case are doing a disservice to women who have serious allegations and want to come forward. The Dems are pushing this like it's a big thing and it's just Russian Collusion ver 2.0. It's a fine example of making the accused look like the actual victim, and that's not good for female accusers. Even the fact that Dr Ford wanted to stay anonymous, and then had her story leaked is a really scary thing for a woman. If a high-ranking Democrat Senator will leak your story against your wishes then what will an average, every day District Attorney or Crown Prosecutor do if you're just talking to them about evidence and still thinking about whether or not to proceed with charges? A lot of women have good reason to really fear their attacker. They might want to have their evidence heard and then get an opinion on whether or not some brutal rapist will actually get locked up. If they find out it's 50/50, or 40/60 they might want to back down, because what woman wants to piss a guy off by charging him with a felony just to walk out the courthouse door at the exact same time as her freshly-acquitted attacker? To be honest, once a person is found innocent they last thing they probably don't want to do is rock the boat, but it would still cause a woman a lot of sleepless nights knowing that he's free, he's violent, and now he has a serious vendetta. They might never even report their crime if they're worried that it's going to be leaked. Everyone should have the same goal in mind, and that's every actual victim having the courage to come forward and have their evidence presented resulting in a conviction, and every falsely accused defendant get acquitted. Going along party lines, or by gender, is repulsive.

Actually, it was liberal feminists who perfected this technique when Bill Clinton was accused of sexual assault by several women. Partisan support for Clinton was far more important than believing victims. Funny how that works....huh ? "You'd better put some ice on that." https://www.amazon.com/Youd-Better-Put-Some-That/dp/1979834245

The whitehouse limited the investigation to claims that were currently on the books because that’s enough to do an investigation on, and because they’re aware of the fact that Democrats don’t really care about a girl who might have suffered through an attempted rape in the early 80’s. They’ll keep bringing baseless allegations just to keep the investigation going. Anyone who’s being honest knows that the Dems just want to delay this appointment in the hopes of getting to the Mid-Terms before Trump can appoint a SCJ.

Why are you trolling this forum with such emotion? We're Canadians. We're watching for the fun of it.

Payette... (sp.) I'd rather keep our system than go to a Republic, I don't mind the Monarchy as it's part of our heritage and culture, they are only figureheads after all. How about Prince Harry, if it's possible for GG

They said right from the get go they would not vote for any appointee, so it was in the cards anyway. Booker (call me Spartacus) says he shouldn't be appointed even if he's cleared. Last I heard was that Ford's ultra resistance lawyers are obstructing as they won't hand over paperwork. IMO women are most upset about the Kavanaugh injustice because they see their sons, fathers, husbands, and uncles in a wrongly accused man that has had his reputation and family destroyed on baseless 35 year old claims that are political driven. It's the politically driven and Juanita Broderick wants an FBI probe - now - remember - all women must be believed.