Leaderboard

"At a point of entry" is key here. Of course, persons seeking entry at designated points of entry will be processed in accordance with the law. Persons entering Canada at other border areas not designated a point of entry are illegal arrivals, should be turned back and advised to go through a legal point of entry. I have to laugh at your comment about conservatives. As if you are qualified to speak to this issue when you don't even know the difference between a designated "point of entry" and illegal crossing areas.

Not necessarily....U.S. Refugee Act sets fiscal year limits at 50,000, and grants the president authority to admit or deny in emergencies Other exclusions apply. All refugees do not have a legal right to admission into the United States, or permanent residency.

Also falsehoods. Don't forget that part. People who come on here and decry MSM lies and talk about liars get their info from lying websites aimed at gullible types. Then those people come here and paste the lies they cut, add a few lines of misspelled comments and claim they are laterns of truth in a dangerous world.

Naw, its just the malignant pustulent sort of whining you engage in that does that.

Try looking it up via Google. Or Norton's help forums. I would suggest just removing Norton all together. It's been a shit AV suite for over a decade.

But this won't happen in Canada. Because our Muslim refugees are way different from THEIR Muslim refugees! After a massive refugee influx, Germany is confronting an imported anti-Semitism A survey of victims of anti-Semitism commissioned last year by the German Parliament concluded that Muslims were most often identified as the perpetrators http://nationalpost.com/news/world/after-a-massive-refugee-influx-germany-is-confronting-an-imported-anti-semitism

Here's a very uncomfortable fact of ISIS that has always bothered me. Regardless of how much people might detest their beliefs, I never understood the level of violence, terror and sheer evil that they leave in their wake. Their stated goal is to have their own country/territory - but killing and maiming everyone in their path is insane. What if their goal is/was actually to create these waves of refugees, effectively creating Trojan Horses to infiltrate the West? A couple of supporting facts: first, extremists have always prescribed to the notion of world domination - even if it takes a thousand years - they play the "long game". Second, Pew Research showed that throughout the Muslim world, favourable support for ISIS exists, although minimal - anywhere from 1% up to 14% depending on the country. Canada has evaded most of the European wave through geography but we've still taken in at least 25,000 Syrians. Even at the tiniest level of 1%, there could be 250 people in our own Trojan Horse who would foster and cultivate beliefs that are totally contrary to democracy. Just a theory of course - do you think it holds any water at all? Link: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/17/in-nations-with-significant-muslim-populations-much-disdain-for-isis/