Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't want to read too much into byelections, but.... Harper must be thinking of forcing a general election this fall.

The Bloc is in disarray and now have lost a strong seat to Harper.

The Liberals are even worse, with infighting after losing Outremont, a sLberal stronghold, and finishing a distant and weak third in the other two ridings.

The NDP don't matter, as usual.

What holds him back? If he waits, the inevitable scandal and hateful media will eventually catch up and damage him. The liberal Senate will continue to confound him. At worst, he could easily win another minority, and if he continues to play Duceppe and Dion as puppetmaster - perhaps a majority.

The government should do something.

Posted
What holds him back? If he waits, the inevitable scandal and hateful media will eventually catch up and damage him. The liberal Senate will continue to confound him. At worst, he could easily win another minority, and if he continues to play Duceppe and Dion as puppetmaster - perhaps a majority.

He is held back by the fixed election date law.

Harper won't go to the Governor General unless defeated in the House.

He will be a lot more forceful and agressive in implementing a new agenda in the House of Commons. The speech from the throne will outline that agenda, or serve as the Conservative Party's platform in the next election. In essence he could force the opposition to defeat him.

When will the next election be? That's up to the opposition parties.

If the Liberals do make moves to dump Dion then we could very likely last until the date mandated for the next election, October of 09.

No one has ever defeated the Liberals with a divided conservative family. - Hon. Jim Prentice

Posted
He will be a lot more forceful and agressive in implementing a new agenda in the House of Commons. The speech from the throne will outline that agenda, or serve as the Conservative Party's platform in the next election. In essence he could force the opposition to defeat him.

What do you think that agenda would be? I'd say the Conservatives need to come up with a policy that is right-wing enough to force the opposition to defeat them, while not too right-wing as to scare away voters in the election. Any suggestions for what that policy could be?

Almost three thousand people died needlessly and tragically at the World Trade Center on September 11; ten thousand Africans die needlessly and tragically every single day-and have died every single day since September 11-of AIDS, TB, and malaria. We need to keep September 11 in perspective, especially because the ten thousand daily deaths are preventable.

- Jeffrey Sachs (from his book "The End of Poverty")

Posted

Here's an idea, sound fiscal planning. If he plays the economics from the right and stays away from Social issues that the people center to left enshrine, he'll get his majority.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted (edited)
Here's an idea, sound fiscal planning. If he plays the economics from the right and stays away from Social issues that the people center to left enshrine, he'll get his majority.

agreed. How about aggressive tax cuts and aggressive infrastructure announcements?

ding ding!

That should have the 'progressives' shrieking. The far left in the liberal party and all the NDP will be forced to not accept it and boom there is an election with something good to sell.

Tax cuts can sell themselves if they are 'real' and not the smarmy stuff from last time.

The infrastructure can be sold as 'green'.

majority.

Edited by White Doors

Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.

~blueblood~

Posted
Here's an idea, sound fiscal planning. If he plays the economics from the right and stays away from Social issues that the people center to left enshrine, he'll get his majority.

That would be about right, or left, either or.....

But seriously, no party without a big tent can hope to form a government. That's why Layton is safe to ignore.....

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)

Well the Liberal party has done it to itself. They had a choice between Ignatieff and Dion. Can you see a guy who advocates torture (OK, under the 'right' conditions) ever getting elected in Quebec? Fat chance.

Maybe it's time to vote NDP. Anything but a fascist, bush-kissing neocon. I wonder if Naomi Klein has ever considered running... :lol:

Edited by Higgly

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Well the Liberal party has done it to itself. They had a choice between Ignatieff and Dion. Can you see a guy who advocates torture (OK, under the 'right' conditions) ever getting elected in Quebec? Fat chance.

Maybe it's time to vote NDP. Anything but a fascist, bush-kissing neocon. I wonder if Naomi Klein has ever considered running...

Naomi Klein?

LOL!!

hahaha

thanks for that.

Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.

~blueblood~

Posted
Maybe it's time to vote NDP.

HAhahaha... :lol:

Oh you're too funny.

"To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader

Posted (edited)
Naomi Klein?

LOL!!

hahaha

thanks for that.

Yeah I added a LOL. But of course White Doors, you'd be operating on another level wouldn't you? Cat fights and boobies, is it not?

Edited by Higgly

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Sure junior. Back to the sandbox.

But who is throwing the sand?

"To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader

Posted
Here's an idea, sound fiscal planning. If he plays the economics from the right and stays away from Social issues that the people center to left enshrine, he'll get his majority.

Don't be absurd. Canadians vote for the party which promises them the most goodies. That has been the story for decades.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...