wendy Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Is the suggestion of an attack in Montreal worse than 9/11 a genuine or fabricated scenario? Are Quebecers being psychologically "prepared" to blame Muslim immigrant groups, for an even worst attack in Montreal than 9/11, in relation to the World Trade Center in the United States? The Quebec political Establishment often makes public utterances on their professed interests to "stand-up for Quebec". However, the Quebec Political Establishment has substantively tied itself to the commercially profitable and military expansionist pro-war agenda of Anglo-American based political-military-industrial complex. This is most evident in the backroom support of the elite driven Quebec Political Establishment for the North American Union (NAU) agenda. Ken Hernandez provides the following detailed account of investigative research which he has made concerning matters pertinent. His accompanying conclusions and views do not necessarily reflect the conclusion and views of The Canadian: We are certain that the on-going anti-immigrant hype being stoked by Quebec’s French-language media should be viewed in the broader geopolitical context. It is no secret that the overwhelming majority of Canada’s media, political parties, as well as leading business and labour figures have accepted the U.S.-driven agenda regarding Afghanistan. Implicit in the reporting, commentaries, and other media venues is that somehow, Afghanis are responsible for the bombing of New York’s World Trade Centre on September 11th, 2001, and that Osama Bin Laden was the ring leader. This emphasis is all the more so in Quebec. The separatist leadership in Quebec, together with its supporters in the francophone corporate media, have always tended to advance a concept of Quebec nationality, based upon ethno-racial "pure laine" supremacist mythology. At the same time, so-called Quebec interest defending leadership, for the most part, plays a backroom supporting role behind Washington’s designs over Canada. In the last two years, the media in Quebec have been “predicting” that Montreal will fall victim to a terrorist attack. At the same time, these media agents have been curiously neglecting to mention the basis for such a “prediction”, other than to cite self-styled experts who are directly or indirectly linked to an intelligence gathering organization. If the media fails to mention the basis for an assumption, as to a future terror attack occurring in Montreal, what is the motivation behind such posturing? I would submit that the answer is to be found in Vernon Walters’ famous memo to then CIA Director General, George Bush. As Director of Plans (CIA Division in charge of “black bag” or dirty operations), Walters wrote of the importance of securing the media of targeted countries, in order that the public of such countries can be “softened” or lulled into accepting Washington’s designs Coincidence? A blast in Montreal would certainly not be the first of its kind. Apart from the big September 11th 2001 attacks, there is evidence pointing to the July 7th, 2005 explosions in the London transport system, as having been carefully orchestrated by intelligence operatives. In fact, a virtual avowal was broadcast over British airwaves when the head of Visor Consultants (which was supposedly conducting ‘anti-terror’ drills in the London transport system on July 7th, 2005), admitted that the explosions took place at precisely the stations and buses in which the “exercises” were being held, and at the very times during which the “exercises” were to have been held. Lo and behold, the drill became reality, people died, Britain implemented anti-terrorist measures under which some people of Pakistani origin were detained, though the train they were said to have taken from their hometown to London, did not in fact, run on that day, an 85 year old man was arrested for having heckled Tony Blair, an 11 year old girl was detained for riding her bicycle in a park in Dundee, and a protester was arrested for having protested before parliament. Creating fear toward wilfully accepting a fascist "New World Order"? As for Montreal, I would submit that aside from the aforementioned arrangements arrived at so secretively, the public dimension, its execution is of paramount importance. For example, the apparent requirement is that the public MUST be manoeuvred into calling for an end to civil liberties, multiculturalism – perhaps even to the point of internment of “the others” – and war with “rogue states” and terrorist nations”. Against this backdrop, this author submits that the first phase of this operation went into effect in early January. Preparing Quebecers for the targeting of more Muslim scapegoats? Since that time, the Quebec based, French-language corporate media has been featuring the seemingly sudden outburst from a village council (of whom virtually no one has ever heard) after it had put forward an “immigrant’s code of conduct” implicit in which is that Muslims mutilate their daughters and torture women with whom they are engaged in relationships. The adoption of this “code” was made to look as though it came from nowhere -- the village council enacted this measure, and miraculously, by some curious twist of fate or happenstance, Quebec’s French-language media decided this to be newsworthy, and has been keeping the story at the forefront of radio and television reporting, and talk shows. Montreal next 911? Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 GayJay? Is that you? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Bakunin Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Looks like someone with lots of prejudices about quebecers... By the way, i just heard that the serie 7 of "24" could be about quebec separatist... Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I love how the title of the thread is... "....for next "False Flag" event?" I think August was talking about posts like this Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
ScottSA Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I love how the title of the thread is..."....for next "False Flag" event?" I think August was talking about posts like this 911 was the first false flag event. It just got out of hand. Then Spain and then London, but those were just fakes perpetrated by the coalition of International Jewry, Bushitler, and the invisible sky monster bankers and their mass mindmelds. Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I love how the title of the thread is... "....for next "False Flag" event?" I think August was talking about posts like this 911 was the first false flag event. It just got out of hand. Then Spain and then London, but those were just fakes perpetrated by the coalition of International Jewry, Bushitler, and the invisible sky monster bankers and their mass mindmelds. ...shur Gayjay Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
scribblet Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 911 was the first false flag event. It just got out of hand. Then Spain and then London, but those were just fakes perpetrated by the coalition of International Jewry, Bushitler, and the invisible sky monster bankers and their mass mindmelds. The shadow knows Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
PolyNewbie Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 These guys help show what an idiot is required not to see these attacks are inside jobs. It seems like they are on our side. Quote Support the troops. Bring them home. Let the bankers fight their own wars. www.infowars.com Watch 911 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871 "By the time the people wake up to see the bars around them, the door will have already slammed shut." Texx Mars
Catchme Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Well, they certainly seem to be being prepared for something, and as a result much nasty rhetoric against Muslims is coming from there. I put nothing past these UR fascists on the right. Quote When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die. ~Jean-Paul Sartre
ScottSA Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 I think she's on to us. I'm using my secret decoder ring to put out an alert to Dr. No's Ultrafarrightwing base to round them up in the next secret roundup of people getting too close to the TRVTH. Quote
geoffrey Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Well, they certainly seem to be being prepared for something, and as a result much nasty rhetoric against Muslims is coming from there. I put nothing past these UR fascists on the right. Because Quebec is the right-wing bastion of Canada right? Do you live in that much fear daily, that you think that everyone around is plotting evil things? It becomes more evident with each of your posts, the posts of people like margrace and others on the left, that liberals have very quickly become the biggest fear mongerers in our society. Everything is an evil conspiracy. Please. You really need to relax. Quebec's situation is very different from the rest of Canada, they are trying to preserve (rightly or wrongly) a culture that is threatened by a massive influx of muslim immigration. What can they do? Burkas and hijabs aren't part of the French culture (well, looking at France today would say otherwise). Perhaps Quebecois fear the France syndrome descending upon their population. High segregation, economic isolation and eventually widespread violence. Quebec doesn't want little pockets of other cultures in their society... it may go against the Canadian norm of 'let the immigrants do whatever they wish', but it's not that strange when viewed in comparison to the practices of much of the world. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Leafless Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Quebec's situation is very different from the rest of Canada, they are trying to preserve (rightly or wrongly) a culture that is threatened by a massive influx of muslim immigration. What can they do? Burkas and hijabs aren't part of the French culture (well, looking at France today would say otherwise). Quebec is responsible for their own immigration policy unlike the ROC. Why then are they allowing immigration from groups that have been proven to be culturally troublesome or inferior? Regardless you are simply verifying how incompatible and intolerant Quebec is in many areas and why they should just pack up and leave. Quote
Topaz Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 I believe there is SOME truth in what she says. I did find on the web, about 2 years ago, a website that produced by an American and who has inside info. to the US govt. There was one piece of info. that was a letter to Putin from Uday Hussein written in Russian and English. I believe this letter tells the truth because I remember hearing Putin had warned Bush about an attack on the US. Anyway, the letter tells about their "brothers" were going to attack the US and blame it on OBL and that they had "Americans" helping with attack. It also, mentioned a Canadian and a Intel. US agent. It said they would make sure the Canadian died of "natural" causes and the agent, who knew of the attack coming was, was framed as a criminal and his military and other records disappeared. Now, the natural thing to think is that it only happens in the movies but I believe in this day of the tech world and of the US CIA, anything can be planned and done and make things look in the reverse of how it happens. Let remember some people made BIG bucks on WALL STREET and they have never found out who. Bush planned to take out Hussein back in '99 when he decided to run for president and you can find all these facts on the web if you look for them. Quote
ScottSA Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 I believe there is SOME truth in what she says. I did find on the web, about 2 years ago, a website that produced by an American and who has inside info. to the US govt. There was one piece of info. that was a letter to Putin from Uday Hussein written in Russian and English. I believe this letter tells the truth because I remember hearing Putin had warned Bush about an attack on the US. Anyway, the letter tells about their "brothers" were going to attack the US and blame it on OBL and that they had "Americans" helping with attack. It also, mentioned a Canadian and a Intel. US agent. It said they would make sure the Canadian died of "natural" causes and the agent, who knew of the attack coming was, was framed as a criminal and his military and other records disappeared. Now, the natural thing to think is that it only happens in the movies but I believe in this day of the tech world and of the US CIA, anything can be planned and done and make things look in the reverse of how it happens. Let remember some people made BIG bucks on WALL STREET and they have never found out who. Bush planned to take out Hussein back in '99 when he decided to run for president and you can find all these facts on the web if you look for them. I heard that Elvis was behind it. Hey Topaz? Guess what? Every transaction on wall street is recorded. When somebody makes "big bucks", all one needs to do to find out who is look. You're making stuff up or hallucinating. Stop it. Quote
geoffrey Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 Quebec is responsible for their own immigration policy unlike the ROC. Any province can do so. Alberta will be moving to do so within the next couple of months. Most don't want the responsiblity. Quebec wants to protect their language and culture though, and Alberta wants to fast track skilled workers. The rest just choose not to get involved in immigration. Why then are they allowing immigration from groups that have been proven to be culturally troublesome or inferior? I'd struggle to label someone culturally inferior as a stereotype. Of course there is some cultures that have proven to be more violent, Muslims, Scotsmen, ect.. But I don't think I'd be making immigration choices based on that, some of these people are highly skilled and entrepreneurial. In Calgary, much of the gang violence comes from South East Asians. Banning their immigration however would be devasting to many areas of our economy that rely on their highly skilled (and cheap initially) labour. Regardless you are simply verifying how incompatible and intolerant Quebec is in many areas and why they should just pack up and leave. I don't deny this, I've always supported Quebec sovereignty. I'd like to extend that further and recognize that all of Canada is incompatible in many ways and it's best just to dissolve the entire thing so we can get on with being productive again. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
ScottSA Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 In Calgary, much of the gang violence comes from South East Asians. Banning their immigration however would be devasting to many areas of our economy that rely on their highly skilled (and cheap initially) labour. It's a sad commentary that we need immigration in order to survive economically. Quote
wendy Posted April 18, 2007 Author Report Posted April 18, 2007 Actually if you sheeple had any knowledge of history you would know that government sponsored terrorism is very normal for US government and many others through history as a pretext to gain support and trick its citizens into war. Pear Harbour, USS Liberty, Golf of Tonkin, Reichstag fire and Operations Northwoods are all well known "false flag" events. U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. "These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so embarrassing," Bamford told ABCNEWS.com. "The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but that nobody else wants." http://www.prisonplanet.com/us_military_dr...e_us_cities.htm http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ Quote
geoffrey Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 Pear Harbour, USS Liberty, Golf of Tonkin, Reichstag fire and Operations Northwoods are all well known "false flag" events. Evidence? Oh right. It's all a UNESCO coverup that falsely educates the world. How could I be so silly to not realise that the conspiracy people need no proof! Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 USS Liberty? What war did that start? Okay, you might con someone with Pearl Harbour, especially if they are american and the sum total of their history came from TV. But for other people who know better, you have to convince them that as well as Pearl harbour, the japanese attacks on the Phillipines, Hong Kong, Singapore all on the same day were also 'False Flags" Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
wendy Posted April 18, 2007 Author Report Posted April 18, 2007 USS Liberty? What war did that start?Okay, you might con someone with Pearl Harbour, especially if they are american and the sum total of their history came from TV. But for other people who know better, you have to convince them that as well as Pearl harbour, the japanese attacks on the Phillipines, Hong Kong, Singapore all on the same day were also 'False Flags" 'THE USS LIBERTY:' AMERICA'S MOST SHAMEFUL SECRET http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/2001/...uss_liberty.php In short, Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, knowing full well who and what it was. 34 dead Americans and 171 wounded was the result. Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara deliberately ordered the American naval fighters scrambled to help the Liberty, launched from the USS America and the USS Saratoga, to stand down. Captain Ward Boston, the legal counsel for the U. S. Navy Board of Inquiry that “investigated” the Liberty tragedy, now admits to Mark Glenn of the American Free Press that the former was ordered to cover up the voluminous data which proved the Israeli assault was not an “accident,” as claimed by the Zionist State. Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 USS Liberty? What war did that start? Okay, you might con someone with Pearl Harbour, especially if they are american and the sum total of their history came from TV. But for other people who know better, you have to convince them that as well as Pearl harbour, the japanese attacks on the Phillipines, Hong Kong, Singapore all on the same day were also 'False Flags" 'THE USS LIBERTY:' AMERICA'S MOST SHAMEFUL SECRET Zionist State. So what war with the Jews did it start? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
ScottSA Posted April 18, 2007 Report Posted April 18, 2007 So what war with the Jews did it start? It's a secret war, known only to the 100,000s of thousands of soldiers who fought in it but never drink or talk about it, the presstitutes who are all in the plot, and the Council of the Imperial Black Hand. Or is the Imperial Council of the Black Hand? I forget. Quote
wendy Posted April 20, 2007 Author Report Posted April 20, 2007 Here is an excellent video on the history of government sponsored terrorism Terrorstorm Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 20, 2007 Report Posted April 20, 2007 Here is an excellent video on the history of government sponsored terrorismTerrorstorm And that would be what? The fifth time it's neem posted? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.