Quebec Exposed Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 (edited) Your input regarding the file is appreciated. The file has images from a terrible history book. You have all heard about these books, but have you seen them?....not for the weak hearted. http://quebecexposed.tripod.com/fleurdelise.pdf UPDATE: There is even more hate material coming out of Quebec....videos posted on youtube.... I have posted about this video on the forum, but please see the link below as well. This is a link to the youtube video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lnHQ6YJCyA After you have seen the video, go to my posting about the video and complete the poll. By the way, with hate material like this coming out of Quebec, how can anyone in English Canada possibly consider voting for any more leaders from that place, especially Dion, citizen of France. Edited August 19, 2007 by Quebec Exposed Quote
jbg Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 Your input regarding the file is appreciated. The file has images from a terrible history book. You have all heard about these books, but have you seen them?....not for the weak hearted.http://quebecexposed.tripod.com/fleurdelise.pdf Does that link perhaps overstate the case a bit? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Canadian Blue Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 I've been to Quebec, it really wasn't all that bad. You should go sometime, you might like it. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
Posit Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 Did you do that yourself or did you get some help? It seems the language was a little above you but the content is spot on yours. Quote
jbg Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 I've been to Quebec, it really wasn't all that bad. You should go sometime, you might like it. I was there in March 2005 for the CPC convention. Aside from finding the police unhelpful to the point of being rude and threatening, and finding many merchants pretending not to know English, it's a great place. As far as the Montreal police, I was walking from the Hyatt to the Convention Center underground, and asked one of those fellows for directions. His response was to threaten me with arrest, since, unbeknownst to me, the alcove they were in led to the Gomery hearings. I will say I found Quebec City, in 1979 and 1986, far more user friendly than Montreal in 2005. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jbg Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 Did you do that yourself or did you get some help?It seems the language was a little above you but the content is spot on yours. Huh? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
geoffrey Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 The RoC keeps electing the politicans with agenda to give everything to Quebec, until that changes, we'll have more status quo, Liberal or CPC. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
jbg Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 The RoC keeps electing the politicans with agenda to give everything to Quebec, until that changes, we'll have more status quo, Liberal or CPC. Do tell how one gets a different result when mathematically of almost all of the ROC would have to vote in unison to avoid such bribery of Quebec? If you like that idea, you'd love the election of 1917 (link). Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
madmax Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 I've been to Quebec, it really wasn't all that bad. You should go sometime, you might like it. I was there in March 2005 for the CPC convention. Why would you be at a CPC convention? Quote
jbg Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 I've been to Quebec, it really wasn't all that bad. You should go sometime, you might like it. I was there in March 2005 for the CPC convention. Why would you be at a CPC convention? To meet people at a hospitality suite run by a website I was active in at the time; A chance to do something a bit different; and Because I bloody well felt like it. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
August1991 Posted March 5, 2007 Report Posted March 5, 2007 The most popular sport of some English Canadians: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_bashing It's a minor genus of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Canadianism Quote
Saturn Posted March 5, 2007 Report Posted March 5, 2007 Your input regarding the file is appreciated. The file has images from a terrible history book. You have all heard about these books, but have you seen them?....not for the weak hearted.http://quebecexposed.tripod.com/fleurdelise.pdf What's new about this? I can tell you the history of Quebec from Quebec textbooks as one Quebecker described it to me: "The French and the natives lived happily together. Then the English came, started deporting the French and killing the natives. They reduced the French-speaking population of Quebec to slaves. They are the root of all problems in Quebec." In her opinion, the school textbooks are what teaches/brainwashes Quebeckers to hate the Anglophones. For most Quebeckers, it's all about the Francophones vs the Anglophones. They are so stuck in the past, they don't even realize that a third of those "Anglophones" are Italian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Vietnamese and so on. And they are convinced that those evil Anglophones have to pay for what they've done to Quebeckers. It doesn't matter it was many generations ago and that a small chunk the "Anglophones" today are even related to the Anglophones of those days. It's just those damned "Anglophones"....grrr Quote
blueblood Posted March 5, 2007 Report Posted March 5, 2007 To add on to your point it was those damn Anglophones that let them stay even though they won the war fair and square and granted them the rights to their language and religion and let them keep their homes. Those dirty redcoats... Quote "Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary "Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary Economic Left/Right: 4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
geoffrey Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 To add on to your point it was those damn Anglophones that let them stay even though they won the war fair and square and granted them the rights to their language and religion and let them keep their homes. Those dirty redcoats... Not to mention those anglophones that funded and ran illegal operations during the '95 referendum to keep them in Canada. Though I guess most of the Liberals involved were French. Quebec would be long gone if the game was played fairly in '95. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
BubberMiley Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Quebec would be long gone if the game was played fairly in '95. I guess you didn't read the ballot. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posit Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Another let's not comply with the law series. So it is really Anglo-Canadians that are exempt from their own laws? Or can we narrow this down a bit to maybe "Western Anglo-Canadians" or "Right-Wing Anglo Canadians". Seems you guys are pretty tough on "make-them-comply-with-the-law" issues but shirk away from complying with it yourself. Quote
Saturn Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Not to mention those anglophones that funded and ran illegal operations during the '95 referendum to keep them in Canada. Though I guess most of the Liberals involved were French. They can't admit it was a bunch of home-grown crooks. Blame Canada! Quebec would be long gone if the game was played fairly in '95. Would you miss it? Quote
jbg Posted March 8, 2007 Report Posted March 8, 2007 Not to mention those anglophones that funded and ran illegal operations during the '95 referendum to keep them in Canada. Though I guess most of the Liberals involved were French. They can't admit it was a bunch of home-grown crooks. Blame Canada! Quebec would be long gone if the game was played fairly in '95. Would you miss it? How would America-haters like you get to Halifax then? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
geoffrey Posted March 8, 2007 Report Posted March 8, 2007 Not to mention those anglophones that funded and ran illegal operations during the '95 referendum to keep them in Canada. Though I guess most of the Liberals involved were French. They can't admit it was a bunch of home-grown crooks. Blame Canada!Quebec would be long gone if the game was played fairly in '95.Would you miss it? Why would I miss it? They would still be the same distance away... I'd only have to wait another 10 minutes in customs to get there... I could likely enter and exit the same as I do the United States, perhaps even easier. Some studies suggest interprovincial trade barriers are larger than some international barriers in Canada. Perhaps trade with Quebec would be even easier than it is now. I don't think a country needs a Canadian flag to be a friend of Canada's. I really don't see the difference with or without Quebec. My life would not be impacted at all. In fact, no one would really notice much of a difference, at least in the short/medium term anyways. The long term would be up to Quebec to decide through the elections of their officials, to determine the direction they want to head in. Good for Quebec. If only we played the game fairly and let them have their chance at expressing their democratic voice. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Leafless Posted March 8, 2007 Report Posted March 8, 2007 The RoC keeps electing the politicans with agenda to give everything to Quebec, until that changes, we'll have more status quo, Liberal or CPC. So what party would you suggest we can vote for, that won't give everything to Quebec? Quote
Quebec Exposed Posted March 10, 2007 Author Report Posted March 10, 2007 Your input regarding the file is appreciated. The file has images from a terrible history book. You have all heard about these books, but have you seen them?....not for the weak hearted. http://quebecexposed.tripod.com/fleurdelise.pdf What's new about this? I can tell you the history of Quebec from Quebec textbooks as one Quebecker described it to me: "The French and the natives lived happily together. Then the English came, started deporting the French and killing the natives. They reduced the French-speaking population of Quebec to slaves. They are the root of all problems in Quebec." In her opinion, the school textbooks are what teaches/brainwashes Quebeckers to hate the Anglophones. For most Quebeckers, it's all about the Francophones vs the Anglophones. They are so stuck in the past, they don't even realize that a third of those "Anglophones" are Italian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Vietnamese and so on. And they are convinced that those evil Anglophones have to pay for what they've done to Quebeckers. It doesn't matter it was many generations ago and that a small chunk the "Anglophones" today are even related to the Anglophones of those days. It's just those damned "Anglophones"....grrr I was hoping to get more input from people about whether they were aware just how bad the books are. And furthermore, I would like to know whether people know that our tax dollars are funding these companies in Quebec who are putting out this trash? Guerin gets hundreds of thousands in grants every year. Quote
BC_chick Posted March 10, 2007 Report Posted March 10, 2007 many merchants pretending not to know English. Play reverse psychology. Even if you are fluent in French, speak broken French and they start responding in English. Watching someone mangle your language is more irritating than a person starting a conversation in English while being in a French province. Though they prefer to pretend that it's because "at least you're TRYING to speak French." Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
BC_chick Posted March 10, 2007 Report Posted March 10, 2007 For most Quebeckers, it's all about the Francophones vs the Anglophones. They are so stuck in the past, they don't even realize that a third of those "Anglophones" are Italian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Vietnamese and so on. And they are convinced that those evil Anglophones have to pay for what they've done to Quebeckers. It doesn't matter it was many generations ago and that a small chunk the "Anglophones" today are even related to the Anglophones of those days. It's just those damned "Anglophones"....grrr Maybe "for most separatists," but not "most Quebeckers." And yes, I do agree that it's a very irrational argument.... even if based on a minor level of truth. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
BC_chick Posted March 10, 2007 Report Posted March 10, 2007 To add on to your point it was those damn Anglophones that let them stay even though they won the war fair and square and granted them the rights to their language and religion and let them keep their homes. Those dirty redcoats... In all fairness, it took about 70 years and a few rebellions before the "dirty redcoats" came to that conclusion. Otherwise London's policy was to assimilate the French. Lord Durham's report clearly stated that. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
BC_chick Posted March 10, 2007 Report Posted March 10, 2007 Your input regarding the file is appreciated. The file has images from a terrible history book. You have all heard about these books, but have you seen them?....not for the weak hearted.http://quebecexposed.tripod.com/fleurdelise.pdf I'm not arguing that it's okay to distribute such images to children. But in all fairness, I'm sure there are a number of "facts" in English-Canada's history textbooks which might offend French-Canadians (and First-Nations too). After all, history is written by the winner and the winner in the case of Canada has been the Anglo-Canadians. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.