Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's unsightly and annoying.

The question was is it against the rules, not is it annoying to you.

Being an intentional annoyance is hardly a behavior to be condone on this forum.

From the rules:

BE POLITE AND RESPECT OTHERS

Mapleleafweb operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion. We encourage you to speak your mind on relevant issues in a thoughtful way. Please respect others using this board and treat them with respect and dignity.

Swearing isn't treating anyone with respect. It's not intelligent or thoughtful.

Then we go onto your favourite:

NO TROLLING/FLAMING

Do not post inflammatory remarks just to annoy people.

Which there ya go, it's against forum rules.

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted

Some of us enjoy colour in our language. What's annoying to you is delightfully readable to me. If it's censored with the shift-number keys, you're not forced to read a bathroom wall to get through the post. I say more percentage, number, email-at, and dollar signs in posts.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
Being an intentional annoyance is hardly a behavior to be condone on this forum.

Nobody is asking about intentional annoyance.

I am not interested in your answers. The question is for the admin of the forum, they who decide on and interpret the rules. Your unwanted answers are annoying me, so if you continue then I suppose you're breaking the rules? :blink:

Conservative Party of Canada taking image advice from US Republican pollster: http://allpoliticsnow.com

Posted

gerry i think you are making a deliberate effort to be a pain here Lol

"Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it."

Lao Tzu

Posted
gerry i think you are making a deliberate effort to be a pain here Lol

Not at all. I get accused of breaking the rules in the forum by a particular poster, and when he believes I've broken a rule he'll bring it up again and again and again. What I say doesn't matter to him/her, only the constant accusation. It's what forum admin has called "off topic personal banter" in the past.

So, rather than argue a point on an unrelated topic, I aske the question here. No big deal, no muss, no fuss. If the admin rules that something is fine, the badgering over it will end (hopefully).

Conservative Party of Canada taking image advice from US Republican pollster: http://allpoliticsnow.com

Posted

Dear geoffrey,

Your unwanted answers are annoying me, so if you continue then I suppose you're breaking the rules?
Mr. Geriatric couldn't care less about any answers, nor could he be annoyed...he is what is known as 'a forum troll'. Rather than reply, I suggest the 'ignore' button.

Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?

Posted
Dear geoffrey,
Your unwanted answers are annoying me, so if you continue then I suppose you're breaking the rules?
Mr. Geriatric couldn't care less about any answers, nor could he be annoyed...he is what is known as 'a forum troll'. Rather than reply, I suggest the 'ignore' button.

Reported.

Conservative Party of Canada taking image advice from US Republican pollster: http://allpoliticsnow.com

Posted

I don't find Gerry a troll, not sure why any one else would? What is annoying however, are those that feel it necessary to chase him around and whine about his posts.... ridiculous really.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted
Is it against the rules to use special characters in colorful ways such as asking a poster

"who gives a flying #$%#"?

Or perhaps even just as an expletive such as

"S@#T! I can't believe that!"

thx.

Whether it is against house rules is really beside the point as the use of 'special characters ' in colourful ways constitutes in most cases, low class provocation.

  • Forum Admin
Posted

I'm not sure using special characters is any better than actually swearing. Both are a sign the member can't seem to discuss issues without appealing to vulgarity.

Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...