Fluffypants Posted May 23 Report Posted May 23 I love Democrat in fighting. District 20 WAS being represented by a woman who stole 5 million dollars from the tax payers and who had to quit and now is running again and Uncle Luke part of Two Live Crew running as well but thats ok. Having Debbie Wasserman Schultz who is a big wig in the party can probably get more pork for the community wanting to run is a bridge to far because she doesn't have enough melanin. They told her NOT TO RUN but she didn't listen because its a black only seat. Florida might have to break that district up to stop the racism. Quote
robosmith Posted May 23 Report Posted May 23 18 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: I love Democrat in fighting. District 20 WAS being represented by a woman who stole 5 million dollars from the tax payers and who had to quit and now is running again and Uncle Luke part of Two Live Crew running as well but thats ok. Having Debbie Wasserman Schultz who is a big wig in the party can probably get more pork for the community wanting to run is a bridge to far because she doesn't have enough melanin. They told her NOT TO RUN but she didn't listen because its a black only seat. Florida might have to break that district up to stop the racism. Who is "they"? Are they saying it's the only district a black can win due to current redistricting? Unfortunate you have ZERO EVIDENCE for your BULLSHIT. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 23 Report Posted May 23 1 hour ago, Fluffypants said: I love Democrat in fighting. District 20 WAS being represented by a woman who stole 5 million dollars from the tax payers and who had to quit and now is running again and Uncle Luke part of Two Live Crew running as well but thats ok. Having Debbie Wasserman Schultz who is a big wig in the party can probably get more pork for the community wanting to run is a bridge to far because she doesn't have enough melanin. They told her NOT TO RUN but she didn't listen because its a black only seat. Florida might have to break that district up to stop the racism. I am not following. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
John Johnston Posted May 23 Report Posted May 23 Yet Florida is in play for the first time in over thirty years... What does that tell you? Also, Texas is about to flip. Quote
Fluffypants Posted May 24 Author Report Posted May 24 3 hours ago, John Johnston said: Yet Florida is in play for the first time in over thirty years... What does that tell you? Also, Texas is about to flip. You all been saying that about Texas for decades and never happens. Everytime Ted Cruz's seat comes up we aare told he is going to lose yet he whoops them. 5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I am not following. Schultz lost her seat due to redistricting and she decided to run in a black district and they are mad a Jew dares run for that seat. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 1 hour ago, Fluffypants said: You all been saying that about Texas for decades and never happens. Everytime Ted Cruz's seat comes up we aare told he is going to lose yet he whoops them. Schultz lost her seat due to redistricting and she decided to run in a black district and they are mad a Jew dares run for that seat. You STILL cannot say who "they" is, cause it's just a figment of you imagination. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 8 hours ago, Fluffypants said: You all been saying that about Texas for decades and never happens. Everytime Ted Cruz's seat comes up we aare told he is going to lose yet he whoops them. Schultz lost her seat due to redistricting and she decided to run in a black district and they are mad a Jew dares run for that seat. Ah. Ok Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Nationalist Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 So the Democrat Party is racist? Say it isnt so... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 57 minutes ago, Nationalist said: So the Democrat Party is racist? Say it isnt so... It ain't so. RepubliCONS in FL are redistricting out black majority districts and the Democrats are trying to keep them in Congress. Duh Quote
Legato Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: It ain't so. RepubliCONS in FL are redistricting out black majority districts and the Democrats are trying to keep them in Congress. Duh The Florida Supreme Court ruled that restoring the previous, continuous district to preserve Black voting power would amount to "race-predominant" gerrymandering in violation of equal protection guarantees. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 4 minutes ago, Legato said: The Florida Supreme Court ruled that restoring the previous, continuous district to preserve Black voting power would amount to "race-predominant" gerrymandering in violation of equal protection guarantees. Southern courts have a LONG HISTORY of being RACIST BASTIONS. 🤮 Quote
Legato Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: Southern courts have a LONG HISTORY of being RACIST BASTIONS. 🤮 Which they are correcting to provide equal protection guarantees. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 7 minutes ago, Legato said: Which they are correcting to provide equal protection guarantees. Prove it. Quote
Nationalist Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 44 minutes ago, robosmith said: It ain't so. RepubliCONS in FL are redistricting out black majority districts and the Democrats are trying to keep them in Congress. Duh But the SCOTUS said districts created along racial lines is illegal. 🙂 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Fluffypants Posted May 24 Author Report Posted May 24 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: Prove it. You do understand what equal protection is right? You can't give people special rights. Only Black people get special districts made just for them no matter how goofy it looks, that is unconstitutional. 1 Quote
Legato Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Prove it. A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 2 hours ago, Fluffypants said: You do understand what equal protection is right? You can't give people special rights. Only Black people get special districts made just for them no matter how goofy it looks, that is unconstitutional. BULLSHIT. Taking away black districts is giving whites "special rights." Do you know the meaning of "one man, one vote"? Quote One Man, One Vote “One man, one vote” is a slogan used to express an ideal of equal representation for all citizens. One man, one vote is also often expressed as one person, one vote. In practice, the phrase has been used to argue for redistricting, especially to favor densely populated urban regions over less populated rural areas. Origin of “One Man, One Vote” One man, one vote is closely associated with a series of decisions made by the Supreme Court in the 1960s. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 44 minutes ago, Legato said: A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven. So you CANNOT prove it. Thanks for admitting that. Quote
Fluffypants Posted May 24 Author Report Posted May 24 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: BULLSHIT. Taking away black districts is giving whites "special rights." Do you know the meaning of "one man, one vote"? No its not giving whites "special rights" we are all Americans we all have a vote, we can vote for whoever we want. Your talking like Jim Crow that we have have separate districts. We shouldn't have have someone speaking for a race, we need to have people speaking for Americans. What about Asians and Hispanics, they don't get court ordered special districts and they have a larger voting base than black people. There are black politicians that are elected in White majority districts all the time. You only care because they are a monolithic voting base and ONLY vote Democrat. Where in conservative states where it should like the North East and have 0 or little Democrat representation you had courts literally forcing a Democrat district where there normally wouldn't be one. Quote
robosmith Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 1 minute ago, Fluffypants said: No its not giving whites "special rights" we are all Americans we all have a vote, we can vote for whoever we want. Your talking like Jim Crow that we have have separate districts. We shouldn't have have someone speaking for a race, we need to have people speaking for Americans. What about Asians and Hispanics, they don't get court ordered special districts and they have a larger voting base than black people. There are black politicians that are elected in White majority districts all the time. You only care because they are a monolithic voting base and ONLY vote Democrat. Where in conservative states where it should like the North East and have 0 or little Democrat representation you had courts literally forcing a Democrat district where there normally wouldn't be one. Every one ELSE knows there is a reason why Trump demanded special mid cycle redistricting in Texas, and it's NOT because he wants a fair election when his policies are wildly unpopular. AKA SUCK. Quote
Fluffypants Posted May 24 Author Report Posted May 24 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Every one ELSE knows there is a reason why Trump demanded special mid cycle redistricting in Texas, and it's NOT because he wants a fair election when his policies are wildly unpopular. AKA SUCK. You mean like when Ted Kennedy got sick and the Massachusetts legislature got in there real quick and change the rules to ensure that Romney couldn't replace him. Quote
Legato Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 13 minutes ago, robosmith said: So you CANNOT prove it. Thanks for admitting that. Quote
robosmith Posted May 25 Report Posted May 25 On 5/24/2026 at 12:59 PM, Fluffypants said: You mean like when Ted Kennedy got sick and the Massachusetts legislature got in there real quick and change the rules to ensure that Romney couldn't replace him. Senatorial elections have NOTHING to do with redistricting; they are state wide. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted May 25 Report Posted May 25 On 5/24/2026 at 1:02 PM, Legato said: Sowell quotes say nothing about what the SCOTUS does. Quote
Fluffypants Posted May 26 Author Report Posted May 26 45 minutes ago, robosmith said: Senatorial elections have NOTHING to do with redistricting; they are state wide. Duh God your dense, see if you can follow the bouncing ball. Ted Kennedy got ill and they had a law that said the Governor names a replacement for Senate, the legislature immediately passed a new law calling for a special election because Romney was a Republican. In other words political parties will do whatever they can to gain the advantage. This has 0 to do with race it was due to their party affiliation. Maybe they will get better representation instead of dummies promising them things that are never going to happen like reparations Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.