Hantavirus Thread

[Goddess]

It looks like they're trying to do it again because you let them get away with it the first time.

They had enough push-back with Monkeypox that they dropped that one, but hantavirus looks like a winner to them right now.

 

Thankfully 🙄, Moderna has been working on a hantavirus vaccine for the last couple of years.

Hantavirus Vaccine: Moderna Has Been Developing a Vaccine Since 2023 in Collaboration with a Korean University | IBTimes UK

 

And this hantavirus scare has, not surprisingly, made their shares jump after tanking post-covid.

Moderna shares jump as it reveals it has been researching vaccines against hantaviruses | The Independent

 

This is already stinking, like covid did.  I'm very familiar with PPE - all levels, gas masks, filters and hazmat suits - all levels.  Everybody who is familiar with PPE sees the "irregularities" with the following pictures of patients being offloaded.  If the transmission rate is what they claim it to be.  We'll look at that here, too.

 

So, before they start cancelling the voices of reason from experts in epidemiology and in hantavirus research specifically (like they did with covid), here's some info for you.  I'm hoping that more experts will stand up and come forward this time and they may find it more difficult to do this all over again.

We'll start with Dr. Martin Zizi.

Dr. Zizi is an MD-PhD in molecular Physiology, Public Health and Biophysics.  He graduated from KULeuven University in Belgium.  He has worked dually in both the US & Belgium, governmentally and academically.  He served as Medical Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Bioethical Committee with the Belgian Defense Department.  He has contributed significantly to various medical fields, including neuroscience and holds 24 patents across various disciplines.

For the sake of this topic, you should know that Dr. Zizi has been working on hantavirus research in his own lab for many years now and has published his research.

He was very angry upon seeing Dr. Deborah Birx' appearance on American news and is calling for an inquiry into her remarks, as they were grossly inaccurate, as she ALSO was during covid.

He is calling for scientific truth, which was sorely lacking during the covid years.

 

Here's his remarks from the last few days, on hantavirus:

**************************************************************************************************************

In the past, I used to be Bed DoD med CSO and I ran a zoonosis sentinel lab for Belgian DoD, one of our research and epidemiological topic were Hantaviruses. We even published NON-classified peer reviewed papers, easy to find.

I can confirm one crucial thing - POTUS is totally right to have removed the US from the WHO!   PCR gives up to 80% false positive.

So hopefully you realize that I have NO conflict of interest, and that I fought for years with Prof. Jay Bhattacharya to keep or bring back common sense here in the US.  Two key pieces of information for your benefit (but also for everyone)

- Hantaviruses are zoonosis hence a vaccine is a NOT an intelligent mass protection policy. It is not even a possible idea, as it would require vaccinating ALL rodents!

- On the flip side - Hydroxychloroquine - will (at 400-600 mg /day, for an adult) will BLOCK the entry of the virus inside our cells, hence preventing its reproduction, and mitigating disease and spread.

This was published years ago, but is - of course - NOT on the medical label of this medication. YOU do not need to worry as off-label usage and prescriptions are quite routine in medical treatments. You may hence believe us, to avoid being victim of another mass manipulation... YOU can check me on Google Scholar... Some will unleash a storm of falsehoods like no other!

Sincerely, Yours, Martin ZIZI

*************************************************************************************************************

Hantavirus - cruise ship - and false narratives galore!

My scientific and medical opinion as a scientist who did research on Hantavirus is that an inquiry into Dr Birx is warranted.

Please share massively - accurate info -

1. First and foremost we studied Hantavirus in my lab for many many years and published about it, so what follows is ACCURATE by someone who did THIS! It is a zoonosis, monitored by many Defense depth, and I was one of those army scientific officers (I was CSO of BE DoD actually, not the copy machine guy!) 

2. This woman (Dr Birx) is ‘guilty as charged’ because she was one of the architects of the SARS2 debacle where she forced with her friend (prof Neil Fergusson, Imperial College, London) the policy of ZERO-Covid aka as a suppression policy ZERO covid for a zoonosis? It was NOT possible, not even a policy, only a ploy to bring about a technology that was NOT ready to the market (RNA vaccines).

One can NEVER eradicate (= zero covid) a zoonosis when 600 + mammalian species (cattle, all our pets, zoo animals, deers,... even minks...) share a virus with us and may play 'ping-pong' - that is getting it from us and giving it back to us!

3. Now she is at it again with the same old LIES and misconceptions Hantaviruses, human-to-human contamination is very rare!

For the EU strains, one gets infected crawling in the woods, and literally inhaling rodent poop/urine (a bit like snorting coke LOL)

-The operational army personnel is at risk because that is part of their training and job!

- It has essentially no lethality... but one can get sick, and can get complications IF NOT TREATED, like a bacterial colonization of our lungs 

- For the US Strains (sin Nombre, Andes), there is a slight increase in human-human transfer. - but it remains RARE, - and requires continuous contact with SYMPTOMATIC people for a while like in a family, or like in a CONFINED room with the HVAC of that cruise ship for exemple (where they kept people in THEIR CABINS for a while - which was the ultimate STUPIDITY!) - just passing by someone who coughs or giving a hug - like in the case of a flu, will NOT do it. - mortality nearly only when NOT treated.. that is an important point- very important.

Why NO PCR to find out? The PCR testing can NEVER b used for a fishing trip. Its is because - and it is known for ages, it has a very low PRE-test predictive value. After SYMPTOMS however, in order to ascertain and/or to differentiate between different pathogens, it is perfectly legit.

So systematic PCR will just create FAKE cases, like the 80% false positives obtained for SARS2 during COVID Contagion!

Hantaviruses have a long incubation period (a few weeks) but CAN only be contagious with symptoms. This appears in general after 15-18 days on average, and are FLU-like.

So before any SYMPTOM -> NO contagion

Vaccines? NO matter what they tell you, Hantaviruses are ZOONOSIS - so offering a mass protection (useless as I just explained) via a vaccine is - USELESS - INEFFECTIVE... This is true for ANY zoonosis. Because to really mitigate such transmission, vaccinating humans ONLY would be useless! So vaccines NOT needed, and especially NOT those RNA-based ones.

Treatments exist!

- First of all, we have -when confronted with symptoms- treat those.. like for any flu-like syndrome - if and when bacterial surinfection arises, antibiotics are in order

- HANTA-specific molecules do also exist - Ribavirin is an enzyme blocker of the enzyme of the hantavirus.  

But there is BETTER! ANY medication/drug which interferes with the acidification of late endosomes will PREVENT hanta to reach the biochemical interior of the cell ... and here we find HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE (HCQ) - yep! and it has been published

See here: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Biology https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8006394/ Chloroquine, an Anti-Malaria Drug as Effective Prevention for Hantavirus Infections. The author list is Ironic - this comes in tempore non suspecto from a lab of one Birx Friends - also responsible for the SARS2 debacle in EU and in Belgium. 

And I want you all to understand the next sentence. This bug is a NON PROBLEM (see image below), it is pure media manipulation In Belgium - for example - we have each year between 150 and 350 cases of Hantavirus patients. We do not lose them, and NO one has ever heard about it. Because it is a NON problem! In the US, with the ANDES strain... one has more chances to die from a lightning strike than for an Hantavirus infection. In the US roughly 30 cases a year and 10 deaths, lightning strikes 20 deaths per year and several hundred 'cases" per year too.

And no.. GoF research of this germ is not an easy act... it is NOT a new Hanta, the serology, not the PCR, will prove it. 

So I hereby request that an inquiry into Dr Birx statements be made, her full list of conflicts be researched, and that HHS refers her to DOJ for the spread of FALSE information, with ill intent, as outlined in this post.

Prof dr Martin ZIZI, MD-PhD former CSO BE DoD former UN bioweapon inspector

********************************************************************************************************

Dr Birx (2) - Why is PCR never to be used for fishing trip?

VERY important info to prevent false pandemics! Why's Dr Birx so full of lies.

PCR are not indicated for "fishing trips" on non symptomatic people for numerous reasons:

1. Their PRE-test predictive value is very low... this was known since PCR existed, and hence PCR are only a CONFIRMATION test in symptomatic patients, or a research tool in molecular genetics or environmental or forensics sciences.  But this is FAR from pandemics, right?

2. They are too easy to manipulate - see video below, as they DO not track diseases, but can be positive for many NON SPECIFIC contaminants if amplification cycles are pushed too high, as was done during covid. A sick patient, with high viral loads for example, always has LOW CT's... so that is he/she needs LESS amplification cycles to show threshold positivity. If one needs high CT's like above 23-25 cycles, one enters INTO a non-specific zone.

3. Without ANY clinical symptoms, PCR (+) ≠ Contagion PCR (+) ≠ Infection Because it is NOT the mere presence of a germ that makes you sick, but a certain CONCENTRATION of germs or a certain number of viral particles that gives you a chance to become infected.

WE NEED a threshold for infections - those values can be obtained with cell cultures - For example - for HepB, 10 viral particles can sometimes suffice.  But for SARS2, one needed 1 million virus particles milliliter in OUR throat to be infected.  MOST COVID PCR protocols defined positive as low as 30 viruses per milliliter, or - as in Germany - even LOWER.

GE - pushed by Dr Drosten from Robert Koch Institute (RKI) amplified way above ANY significance and at that CT levels.  ANY thing but the real target is amplified... This is an epistemological limitation of such tests and Dr Drosten ought to come and explain himself for this fluke!

4. And for Hanta? For Hanta, and it is hard to believe, this info is NOT available but it is estimated that between 100 and 1000 particles would be significant ... - which gives a MAX upper boundary of 25 CT (or PCR cycling)

You should know that when patient are sick and symptomatic, they have LARGE viral loads. That is why we rely MOSTLY on serological diagnostics in sentinel labs - followed by PCR confirmation.

5. PLEASE Share massively this highly DIDACTIC video below made during COVID times. It is so clear and self-evident that you will NEVER see the PCR the same way

6... Why are PCR pushed by many? Huge $$$ for test. - Post mortem for COVID years- Here I will illustrate with a paper that I wrote with 2 other specialists in the field - for the benefit of the Belgian authorities. It was screened by other colleagues and shared with the Dept of Molecular Biology in Belgium. https://covidrationnel.be/2021/05/28/pour-une-strategie-de-depistage-efficace-et-objective-des-personnes-susceptibles-de-transmettre-le-sars-cov-2/

It is in French (sorry, but you can translate, right) with over 40 quality peer-reviewed references. It has very useful schematics to explain why the COVID PCR were wrong.

The 5 universities liked it, told us that it needed NO corrections but.. all 5 refused to push it on the table of the Government because of.... money . They told us in no minced terms that WE were stupid because there was so much d=funds GIVEN out to Universities for PCR testings. Those people were like Judas, they sold their ACADEMIC credentials and the health of the population for the 30 silver coins. This is not hearsay, but the actual conversation that we had with those academic labs! Well 8 Billion Euros for France, 2 Billion for Belgium during 2020-2021... $$$ uselessly spent, if I may say!

SO BEWARE - Dr Birx is promoting the very same - for the very same private interests - the PCR machines manufacturers, reagents resales and academic labs... we do not want to usher a second pandemic of testings! SORRY - no way! Please help me educate the crowds - thank you!

[Goddess]

From Dr. Robert Malone's Substack:

Fear is one of the most powerful drugs ever invented.

Unlike antibiotics or antivirals, it requires no FDA approval, no manufacturing plant, and no cold-chain shipping. Fear spreads itself. All it takes is a headline, a few experts on television, ominous music behind a news segment, and suddenly millions of people begin scanning their bodies for symptoms they did not know they had ten minutes earlier.

Psychological Bioterrorism is the weaponization of fear about disease in order to manipulate individuals, populations, markets, and governments. Sometimes the objective is political. Sometimes financial. Sometimes bureaucratic. Often, it is all three at once.

This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a recognized form of psychological warfare. We have written about it extensively in our book Psywar.

In that book, we write about Dr. Alexander Kouzminov, a former Soviet-Russian intelligence officer with deep experience in biological espionage and biosecurity operations, who in 2017, described how fear of infectious disease can be strategically amplified to shape public behavior, influence governments, and create opportunities for those positioned to benefit from the panic. That process is called psychological bioterrorism.

Once you understand the framework, you start seeing the pattern everywhere.

A virus or some other pathogen emerges somewhere in the world. The media shifts into apocalyptic mode. Experts appear to be predicting catastrophe. Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce. Politicians declare emergencies. Pharmaceutical companies announce new products. Social media turns into a digital panic attack. And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

The latest example is the current media frenzy surrounding Hantavirus.

Now, to be clear, Hantavirus is a real disease. It can be serious. It deserves appropriate medical attention and surveillance. Rodent control around homes and barns matters, particularly in areas where the virus is endemic. Nobody sensible is arguing otherwise.

But if you watched the recent media cycle unfold, you would think half the country was moments away from dying in a cloud of mouse droppings drifting through the HVAC system at Tractor Supply.

The reality is far less cinematic.

Hantavirus infections in the United States remain extremely rare. Most cases occur in very specific geographic regions and involve clear exposure risks, typically in enclosed areas contaminated with rodent waste. Yet suddenly, every media outlet behaves as though sweeping out your old feed room or poking around your basement is equivalent to starring in a Hollywood outbreak movie.

This is how psychological bioterrorism works. The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.

Fear scales faster than facts.

The reason these campaigns work so well is simple. Human beings are biologically wired to fear invisible threats. A wolf outside the cave is frightening. But an invisible virus floating through the air? That activates something much deeper in the human nervous system. You cannot see it. You cannot smell it. You cannot negotiate with it. Every stranger becomes a potential threat. Every cough becomes suspicious.

That loss of control is the point.

Psychological bioterrorism succeeds because it simultaneously creates four powerful emotional conditions.

• First, speed. Modern communications allow fear to spread globally in real time. One dramatic headline in New York can trigger anxiety in Nebraska before breakfast.

• Second, vulnerability. Most people feel helpless against infectious disease. They do not know what is true, what is exaggerated, or what actually works. That uncertainty creates dependency on authorities.

• Third, confusion. During outbreaks, conflicting information floods the public sphere. Models change. Predictions fail. Definitions shift. Recommendations reverse. In the fog of uncertainty, populations become easier to steer.

• And fourth, social pressure. Once fear takes hold, compliance becomes a kind of tribal ritual. Masks, distancing, endless boosters, disinfecting groceries, standing on little floor stickers six feet apart like contestants in a strange game show. Many of these behaviors become symbols of belonging as much as they do of actual disease mitigation.

Humans are social creatures. We want to belong to the protected group.

That instinct can be manipulated.

Suddenly, every dusty shed becomes a potential death trap. Sweep out the feed room, and apparently, you now require the courage of a Navy SEAL entering Fallujah.

This is where the psychology becomes more important than the pathogen itself. The actual risk matters less than the emotional framing. Invisible threats produce a unique type of anxiety because people cannot easily assess danger with their own senses. You can see smoke from a fire. You can hear a tornado siren. But you cannot see a virus particle. That uncertainty creates fertile ground for fear amplification.

And once fear takes hold socially, it becomes self-reinforcing. People constantly scan for danger signals. Every cough becomes suspicious. Every news alert feels urgent. Social media feeds become giant feedback loops of anxiety. One frightened person shares alarming information with ten others, who then amplify it further. Before long, the emotional reaction has become detached from the actual statistical risk.

We watched this dynamic unfold repeatedly during COVID. We are now seeing smaller replay versions with avian influenza, Hantavirus, measles outbreaks, and whatever pathogen dominates the next media cycle. The script rarely changes. First comes the alarming headline. Then come the predictive models. Then the expert panels. Then the declarations that “we must act now.” Soon, politicians, bureaucracies, corporations, and media organizations all become economically and institutionally invested in maintaining public attention on the threat.

Fear becomes infrastructure.

One of the more fascinating aspects of these cycles is how often speculative language is transformed into emotional certainty. Watch closely, and you will notice the repeated use of phrases like “could spread,” “may mutate,” “might become severe,” or “has pandemic potential.” Scientifically, these statements may be technically true. Almost anything in biology is possible. But psychologically, the public often processes those phrases as though catastrophe is inevitable. That shift in language matters enormously.

Most people do not have the time, scientific background, or emotional distance to continuously evaluate evolving risk claims. They rely instead on emotional tone and institutional trust. If every headline sounds urgent, the brain assumes there must be urgency. This is one reason why psychological bioterrorism is so effective. The campaign does not require outright fabrication. It only requires selective amplification, strategic framing, repetition, and emotional saturation.

Historically, governments and institutions have always understood the political utility of fear. Fear justifies emergency powers. Fear accelerates funding streams. Fear increases media consumption. Fear also creates social cohesion around compliance behaviors. During COVID, entire rituals emerged around masking, distancing, sanitizing groceries, vaccination, and public displays of “doing the right thing.” Some interventions may have had a partial benefit. Others bordered on theater. But all served an additional social purpose by signaling membership in the morally protected group.

Humans desperately want to belong to a protected group.

That instinct is ancient. And it is easily manipulated.

None of this means infectious diseases are imaginary, nor does it mean all public health officials are malicious actors. Real outbreaks happen. Surveillance matters. Preparedness matters. Basic hygiene matters. But proportionality matters too. A society permanently trapped in hypervigilance eventually loses the ability to distinguish genuine emergencies from manufactured panic.

And that may be the greatest long-term danger of all.

When populations are conditioned to exist in a constant state of biological anxiety, they become psychologically exhausted. Trust erodes. Critical thinking deteriorates. Some people become permanently fearful. Others swing toward reflexive cynicism and stop believing anything at all, including legitimate warnings. Both outcomes are destructive.

An even bigger danger is the use of prolonged national health emergencies by those in charge to seize power. Election processes are manipulated or deferred. Medical practitioners who don’t comply or speak out lose their licenses permanently. Small businesses are shuttered, while large transnational corporations with ties to the government grow ever bigger. More “safety” regulations that benefit big ag are incorporated. Rules tighten, and freedoms become more restrictive.

The challenge moving forward is not to become fearless. The challenge and opportunity is to become harder to manipulate.

That requires perspective, resilience, and the willingness to ask calm questions during moments of manufactured urgency. Who benefits from the panic? What evidence actually exists? What is known versus speculative? Are we responding proportionally to the actual level of risk?

Most importantly, we must learn to recognize when fear itself has become the product being marketed.

Because once societies accept perpetual emergency as normal, freedom begins to erode one anxious headline at a time.

[User]

So far, the vast majority of fear mongering I see is coming from the anti-vax crowd like you are doing here.

 

[Goddess]

13 minutes ago, User said:

So far, the vast majority of fear mongering I see is coming from the anti-vax crowd like you are doing here.

 

You think I made up the hantavirus thing?

🤣

I saw a stat that there's been over 100,000 articles about it already.

I'm just getting ahead of it, like I did last time.  If you wanna poop your pants like YOU did last time - knock yourself out.  I'm hoping more people got wise since then.  Obviously, not you.

[User]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You think I made up the hantavirus thing?

🤣

I saw a stat that there's been over 100,000 articles about it already.

I'm just getting ahead of it, like I did last time.  If you wanna poop your pants like YOU did last time - knock yourself out.  I'm hoping more people got wise since then.  Obviously, not you.

No, you didn’t make it up, but you are here fear mongering about it. 
 

You are the one pooping your pants about it.

OMG there were 100,000 articles! OMG it’s gonna be just like COVID! <- That is you, not me.

 

[herbie]

1 hour ago, User said:

So far, the vast majority of fear mongering I see is coming from the anti-vax crowd like you are doing here.

 

OMG User abd I agree on something.

Bipo;lar poster in panic attack

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, herbie said:

OMG User abd I agree on something.

Bipo;lar poster in panic attack

LOL  The very same people who got fooled the first time when Trudeau said Covid was nothing and that not letting planeloads of Chinese into the country from Wuhan was......RACIST.  Then.....BOOM.  

There was herbie and user pooping their pants on command.  🤣

The same thing they'll do every time. What a couple of braindead zombies.

Dr. Battacharya is getting ahead of the panic in the US:

Or is he also..........FEARMNGERING?

Those plotting through Hantavirus fear is blowing up in their hands.

The great wave of panic they were waiting for has begun to break with sensible statements coming directly from within the system itself. Jay Bhattacharya, Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), dashed the fearmongers' hopes with these words: "Hantavirus is not a Corona, and we don't want to treat it like a Corona. We shouldn't give in to panic unless the evidence demands it. We want to manage this virus using the Hantavirus protocols that have proven themselves in the past."

What does this statement mean?

Lockdown Dreams Over: By acknowledging that the virus does not have the potential for a mass pandemic like Corona, the NIH Director is rejecting "house arrest" scenarios.

WHO Sidelined: With America's withdrawal from the WHO, global health dictatorship has lost its biggest financial and scientific engine. Without America, every measure the WHO takes on Hantavirus is doomed to remain on paper.

Protocol Emphasis: What Bhattacharya calls "past protocols" is actually the fact that the virus does not transmit from person to person and can be controlled through natural means.

Conclusion: As information is shared, the empire of fear is being ignored. These sensible moves by scientists are already tearing down the walls of the global narrative. 

[John Stone]

................ this jack-wagon, aka Capt Measles, is quoted yesterday in the WH as saying, 'nothing to worry about'. 

[User]

39 minutes ago, Goddess said:

LOL  The very same people who got fooled the first time when Trudeau said Covid was nothing and that not letting planeloads of Chinese into the country from Wuhan was......RACIST.  Then.....BOOM.  

There was herbie and user pooping their pants on command.  🤣

The same thing they'll do every time. What a couple of braindead zombies.

So… back to my point, you are the one fear mongering about this. 
 

Bot sure how you think I was fooled the first time, but you are now fear mongering that we should be panicking this time because OMG this is what they did with COVID too! They downplayed it at first. 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, User said:

you are the one fear mongering about this.

Well, I'm in good company then.  Dr. Battacharya is also "fear mongering" it.

I'm just trying to make sure you ding-dongs THINK before you start pooping your pants again and demanding your fellow citizens get sent to concentration camps, lose their jobs, traumatize kids, force inject an experimental concoction, collapse the economy, shut down businesses and schools, kill children who didn't need the forced injection in the first place, cause young mothers to end up quadriplegic who didn't need it in the first place.......all the stuff you went along with the first time.

Forgive me if I still think you're an id10t who poops their pants whenever the TV tells you to.  I mean, we both know if the Government locks everything down again tomorrow, you'd be cheering it on, like you did the last time.

Maybe brush up on the Milgram and Asche experiments?  Because we already know what cohort you'd be in.

[Goddess]

You are, psychologically, the ideal organism for this kind of thing.

You are physically, spiritually and mentally malleable.  You immediately adopt and internalize whatever you see on TV, and then truly believe it was all your own personal decisions.  Your reaction to being outright lied to is blank-eyed indifference.  You believe servitude and subservience to the government makes you better than others who don't.

Absolutely IDEAL subjects.

[User]

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Well, I'm in good company then.  Dr. Battacharya is also "fear mongering" it.

I'm just trying to make sure you ding-dongs THINK before you start pooping your pants again and demanding your fellow citizens get sent to concentration camps, lose their jobs, traumatize kids, force inject an experimental concoction, collapse the economy, shut down businesses and schools, kill children who didn't need the forced injection in the first place, cause young mothers to end up quadriplegic who didn't need it in the first place.......all the stuff you went along with the first time.

Forgive me if I still think you're an id10t who poops their pants whenever the TV tells you to.  I mean, we both know if the Government locks everything down again tomorrow, you'd be cheering it on, like you did the last time.

Maybe brush up on the Milgram and Asche experiments?  Because we already know what cohort you'd be in.

Holy crap, you are on here talking about concentration camps. 
 

You are the one fear mongering and pooping your pants! 

[User]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You are, psychologically, the ideal organism for this kind of thing.

You are physically, spiritually and mentally malleable.  You immediately adopt and internalize whatever you see on TV, and then truly believe it was all your own personal decisions.  Your reaction to being outright lied to is blank-eyed indifference.  You believe servitude and subservience to the government makes you better than others who don't.

Absolutely IDEAL subjects.

Who are you talking to, ROFL?!

You are the one going off about concentration camps! 
 

Im enjoying my lunch and having a wonderfully normal day. 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, User said:

You are the one fear mongering and pooping your pants! 

You forgot to "like" john stone's comment. 👆

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, User said:

You are the one going off about concentration camps! 

The point, which you are obtusely avoiding, is that all it would take is a couple days of CBC fear porn coverage and you'd be pooping your pants on command. 

AGAIN. 

[User]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You forgot to "like" john stone's comment. 👆

LOL

If RFK says not to worry… OMG, then you should be worried, right? Don’t want to be fooled again, sent off to the concentration camps!!!!

Edited May 12 by User

[User]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The point, which you are obtusely avoiding, is that all it would take is a couple days of CBC fear porn coverage and you'd be pooping your pants on command. 

AGAIN. 

I never pooped my pants the first time. 

You are the one pooping your pants right now! 

[Goddess]

Nope. I just remember what you diapers wearers did the last time.

And I'm not going to let you re-write history.

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, User said:

I never pooped my pants the first time. 

Baloney.

You stick up for everything that was done.

The most you've said is that you didn't agree with mandates, but when I asked you what you did about it, you did nothing.

So maybe sit this one out, you're either stoopid or a coward.

[User]

12 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Nope. I just remember what you diapers wearers did the last time.

And I'm not going to let you re-write history.

You have some caricature you want to beat up, and it isn’t me. No matter how hard you try, you are just making up crap about me, just like you have made up crap to argue against I’ve never said in previous discussions.

 

10 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Baloney.

You stick up for everything that was done.

The most you've said is that you didn't agree with mandates, but when I asked you what you did about it, you did nothing.

So maybe sit this one out, you're either stoopid or a coward.

I don’t stick up for everything that was done though. Not even close.

I never said I did nothing. Another lie from you.

Sit what out? 
 

THERE IS NOTHING TO SIT OUT! 
 

ROFL, you are the one fear mongering and pooping your pants right now.

 

I just finished lunch. Back to my lovely day. 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, User said:

You have some caricature you want to beat up, and it isn’t me. No matter how hard you try, you are just making up crap about me, just like you have made up crap to argue against I’ve never said in previous discussions.

 

Look, I know it sucks when you have a track record for being a braindead zombie coward and someone calls you out for it.

Suck it up, buttercup.

[User]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Look, I know it sucks when you have a track record for being a braindead zombie coward and someone calls you out for it.

Suck it up, buttercup.

LOL

Sure. Your track record is to push the same old tired anti vax talking points and then run away when confronted with actual facts and date that contradict you.

Just like now, you are here fear mongering about the Hantavirus response, got called out, and have to lash out making up crap about me instead.

 

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, User said:

then run away when confronted with actual facts and date

You haven't presented any here.

Look, I hope you're right and this doesn't become Covid 2.0 on steroids.  I'm providing facts and data to prevent that.  And you are, apparently, very much against that.  So.......

**shrug**

If someone is holding a gun to your head, forcing you to be on this thread, blink twice and we can send help.

[User]

5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You haven't presented any here.

Look, I hope you're right and this doesn't become Covid 2.0 on steroids.  I'm providing facts and data to prevent that.  And you are, apparently, very much against that.  So.......

**shrug**

If someone is holding a gun to your head, forcing you to be on this thread, blink twice and we can send help.

LOL… “hope”

You are sitting in your poopy pants typing right now! 
 

 

[herbie]

sYILL CARRYING ON ABOUT SHIT THA'S OVER.

And still acting llike if there's an infectious disease going around and there's a shot for it, people who take it are the stupid ones.
Inane.