Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Owens is convinced there's much more to the Kirk murder than we've been told. I dont blame her for digging. The whole story seems...a little fishy. Not to mention the auditing Charlie was asking for.

But...we'll probably never know for sure.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Owens is convinced there's much more to the Kirk murder than we've been told. I dont blame her for digging. The whole story seems...a little fishy. Not to mention the auditing Charlie was asking for.

But...we'll probably never know for sure.

She is not "digging" or vaguely asserting there is more. She is pushing absurdly outlandish lies and conspiratorial BS with zero evidence while also dragging his wife through the mud with BS on top of that. She is an evil ghoul. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, User said:

She is not "digging" or vaguely asserting there is more. She is pushing absurdly outlandish lies and conspiratorial BS with zero evidence while also dragging his wife through the mud with BS on top of that. She is an evil ghoul. 

She's getting hers. This grift is making her a crap ton of money. The official story is pretty air tight. 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, User said:

She is not "digging" or vaguely asserting there is more. She is pushing absurdly outlandish lies and conspiratorial BS with zero evidence while also dragging his wife through the mud with BS on top of that. She is an evil ghoul. 

 

24 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

She's getting hers. This grift is making her a crap ton of money. The official story is pretty air tight. 

Guys...I'm bothered about the audit Kirk wanted done and the stories of ... shall we say ... extreme partying.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

Guys...I'm bothered about the audit Kirk wanted done and the stories of ... shall we say ... extreme partying.

No, you are pushing conspiratorial BS from an evil ghoul. 

 

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

Guys...I'm bothered about the audit Kirk wanted done and the stories of ... shall we say ... extreme partying.

Don't be. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

Candice has been seeming really unhinged lately. 

Her and Tucker really went off on a tangent.

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
23 minutes ago, User said:

No, you are pushing conspiratorial BS from an evil ghoul. 

 

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Don't be. 

Hmmm...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hmmm...

 

 

Now that you have seen it, you can't unsee it. All she is doing is asking questions, right? But her questions are leading and accusatory. She wants you to draw the conclusion so she has deniability in court. If she gets sued, all she has to do is say she did not say x or y, she just asked and didn't answer a question. 

In the mean time, people draw their own conclusions and come to believe things. Like, there is an Epstein list or Epstein was murdered. Both appear to be false...now. 

She has you believing Kirk wanted some audit. Ok. So? That does not change the fact that a radical liberal, Antifa member that was gay and into furries decided it would relieve the stress he felt from someone holding strong opposing opinions if he just killed said person.

Occam's razor - which explanation has more assumptions:

Scenario A: Nut job believes hate filled rhetoric and decides to kill Kirk, gets caught on camera, leaves behind evidence and eventually turns himself in

Or

Scenario B: unknown person  mad about an audit convinced a Saudi Prince to send an operative to help a recruit from an online portal that happens to live in the area and is self radicalized and willing to throw his life away. Then leaves no evidence other than an aircraft landing near the area, never provides any financial compensation, leaves no communication trail and in no way is suspected as having contacted the shooter or anyone involved with some audit.

Is Scenario A or B making the fewest assumptions? 

The story line she wants you to believe is crazy town. If it were a movie,  it would be on par with Ocean's 8. It is far to intricate and fantastical to be true. Especially since all she has is innuendo.

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...