Canada life expectancy falling, goes from 5th in the world to 22nd. ... not just QUALITY of life, libs have taken away ACTUAL life as well

[ExFlyer]

50 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

  Soo you admit that you're repeating a lie

 

 Nope

Yup. You get what you are worth... LOSER 

What lie...the quote is directly from you...cannot back out like you always try to do LOSER...you said it HA HA HA

You are just sad and upset cause you had to bail out on your hero PP Le Pew  by saying "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." LOL  LOL LOL

Sad Sad Sad LOSER

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

The title is misleading. Life expectancy has gone up in Canada over that period. 

Sure, but life expectancy has been going up generally speaking for hundreds of years now.  It's not misleading to say it's not as high in canada as it should be, and at one time canada was a leader, comfortably in the top 10 consistently, and now we've fallen far behind 

So no matter how you slice it we are not living as long as we should be.  We're dying earlier than we should. 

And rather than comment on that and address the issue you're kind of trying to twist things so they don't sound quite as bad in order to defend the libs. 

Again. 

You see the pattern i'm talking about right?   

This should be upsetting to you even if you are a liberal supporter.  if the conservatives had been in power and failed that badly i'd be speaking up and saying we need to address this, but because it's liberals who were in charge when most of it happened it's "umm well it's not THAAAAAT bad is it? Really?"

[Moonbox]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You didn't and no it doesn't.

You said our ranking didn't slide during the Harper and I asked you if you had any cites or proof.  As usual, you did not.  As usual, you refused to provide anything and instead opted for useless long-form bloviating.  

In contrast, I did a 10 second Google search and quickly discovered you were full of shit.  

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Going up or down one or two places is closer to a rounding error. 

Even here, you're full of shit:

 

Is 6-8 places also a rounding error? If so, then you'd have to excuse the decline under the Liberal years as well. 

We could, of course, have a discussion about why Canada is declining relative to other countries.  Is it because we're not doing well, or other countries are doing better?  What's the difference and how much does it matter.  That sort of adult, nuanced discussion isn't going to happen with you participating, however.  

Edited December 2, 2025 by Moonbox

[John Stone]

........... Justin

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

You said our ranking didn't slide during the Harper and I asked you if you had any cites or proof.  As usual, you did not.  As usual, you refused to provide anything and instead opted for useless long-form bloviating.  

In contrast, I did a 10 second Google search and quickly discovered you were full of shit.  

Even here, you're full of shit:

 

Is 6-8 places also a rounding error? If so, then you'd have to excuse the decline under the Liberal years as well. 

We could, of course, have a discussion about why Canada is declining relative to other countries.  Is it because we're not doing well, or other countries are doing better?  What's the difference and how much does it matter.  That sort of adult, nuanced discussion isn't going to happen with you participating, however.  

And combined their seven.

LOL the original report was combined, my figures were combined, but to try to lie your way out of being stupid you needed to break them in to two  

In 2006 we were in 5th place over all, we were still there in 2010, and in 2015 we slipped two spots to 7,, 

As i already provided proof for. 

And yeap, that's basically a margin of error thing.  Countries are going to go up or down a spot or two over time, that's natural. 

However dropping 18 points is not  

I'm not going to have to give you another math lesson am i? LOLOLOL

You're already having to twist the truth and rework the numbers several different ways to try and come up with an answer you like, that should be evidence enough for you that you're going to wind up looking stupid.

Harper held the line. he kept canada in the top ten and despite there being a major recession he increased medical funding to the provinces substantially and canadians were healthier  

The liberals specifically under trudeau saw some years where life expectancy went DOWN, and even though it's now up compared to 2015 the liberals have caused us to fall to the top 30 instead of the top 10. 

And once again you're here blindly defending them and trying to excuse that with bad math that makes you look like a twat  

 

[Moonbox]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL the original report was combined, my figures were combined, but to try to lie your way out of being stupid you needed to break them in to two  

Of course I broke it in two, you assclown.  You said the rankings didn't decline under Harper.  I very easily showed they did.  

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

In 2006 we were in 5th place over all, we were still there in 2010, and in 2015 we slipped two spots to 7,, 

You have a cite for that, right?  Of course you don't.  You never do.  🤡

Once again: 

 

Edited December 2, 2025 by Moonbox

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Moonbox said:

Of course I broke it in two, you assclown.  You said the rankings didn't decline under Harper.  I very easily showed they did.  

You have a cite for that, right?  Of course you don't.  You never do.  🤡

Once again: 

 

But we aren't talking about female versus male. We're talking about the overall death rate

I realize you're a liberal but I'm not going to have to explain the difference between  male and female to you am I?

Ranking Trends

• Around 2004-2007: Canada typically ranked among the top 10 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and often higher in global comparisons. One report noted a rank of 9th among OECD countries in 2007.
• Around 2010-2015: The ranking showed a clear decline. Canada's life expectancy at birth dropped from around 2nd to 7th place among a set of 19 comparator countries between 1990 and 2010.
• Recent Years (2023-2025 estimates): The decline trend has continued.
  • In 2023, one analysis placed Canada at 17th globally.
  • For 2025, estimates place Canada around 20th to 23rd globally, with a life expectancy of approximately 82.7-83.0 years. The CIA World Factbook 2024 estimate ranks Canada 5th, but this ranking can vary significantly based on the specific data source and year of information. 

 

 

Sorry kid, you really do need to take some math lessons and apparently some biology ones as well.

You're desperately trying to twist and turn the numbers but the fact of the matter is when using comparable numbers we went from about five to seven by the end of harper's term and have now dropped to 23rd. And the vast majority of that happened under Justin's time

The guys gone and you're still desperately trying to defend the guy.

So now you need to take a math lesson AND a lesson in sexual biology    Dum da dum dumb  

[Moonbox]

35 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ranking Trends

• Around 2004-2007: Canada typically ranked among the top 10 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and often higher in global comparisons. One report noted a rank of 9th among OECD countries in 2007.
• Around 2010-2015: The ranking showed a clear decline. Canada's life expectancy at birth dropped from around 2nd to 7th place among a set of 19 comparator countries between 1990 and 2010.
• Recent Years (2023-2025 estimates): The decline trend has continued.
  • In 2023, one analysis placed Canada at 17th globally.
  • For 2025, estimates place Canada around 20th to 23rd globally, with a life expectancy of approximately 82.7-83.0 years. The CIA World Factbook 2024 estimate ranks Canada 5th, but this ranking can vary significantly based on the specific data source and year of information. 

This is freaking hilarious.  You're citing things that not only don't support your claims, but also directly undermine them.  

1)  Nothing in there shows us ranked 5th in 2006, nor 7th in 2015, as you've claimed. 

2) Your own source directly points to a clear decline in our rankings from 2010-2015, which was under Harper's watch, which is exactly what you claimed didn't happen.  GOOD JOB!  🤣

When I asked you to cite something, I wasn't expecting you to go out and humiliate yourself this spectacularly, but as usual, the best way to make you look dumb is to just keep you talking.  Thanks for the laughs again bozo!  🤡👍

Edited December 2, 2025 by Moonbox

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

This is freaking hilarious.  You're citing things that not only don't support your claims, but also directly undermine them.  

I suppose a twat might see it that way

Quote

1)  Nothing in there shows us ranked 5th in 2006, nor 7th in 2015, as you've claimed. 

Ranked in the top 10, other sources I provided said 5th.  Now I realize that it doesn't actually say 2006, what it says is 2004 to 2007. Your math skills are so weak you probably didn't realize that six was in between those two  

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

2) Your own source directly points to a clear decline in our rankings from 2010-2015,

OF two points.  Which i already noted, and pointed out it's basically nothing.  Falling or gaining one or two points up and down is not much of anything. Especially over a number of years. The countries are always improving and some will be ahead one year and behind another.... it's a decline but really nothing. 

As i said, harper held the line. 

So we finished about where we were at. In the top 10, maybe two points below where we started but no significant movement. 

Then we dropped about 17 points. THAT is significant  

Quote

When I asked you to cite something, I wasn't expecting you to go out and humiliate yourself

When you asked to cite something I completely expected you to lie about the response and to fail to understand. I really appreciate you not disappointing  

As I said, harper held the line. He did good and there was no substantial or significant up or down movement. Countries always go up or down one or two especially over 10 years 

Under Justin it dropped 17 

 

Everything I said was true and once again you look like a complete twat Because you can't understand simple math and common sense statements  

[Moonbox]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Everything I said was true and once again you look like a complete twat Because you can't understand simple math and common sense statements  

Everything you said was categorically false.  Where I proved that with 10 seconds on Google's AI bot, you've been reduced to your typical emoji ranting and uselessly insisting that you didn't just make a clown out of yourself, again.  

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

As I said, harper held the line.

You say A LOT of things.  Too bad most of it it is dumb, and generally contradicts reality:

Where I can quickly prove your claim was bullshit with a 10 second Google search and copy-paste it here, you're left sputtering and waving your hands around trying to convince people that more of your bullshit and make-believe is somehow valid citation for the previous pile you dumped all over yourself.  🤡