Pierre Poilievre proposes changing the law to allow people to defend their home and families without all the present complicated requirements.

[Venandi]

25 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

Instead of just bending facts, you and your colleagues excel at turning them into balloon animals.

Is this you?

Edited September 4, 2025 by Venandi

[ExFlyer]

2 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Instead of just bending facts, you and your colleagues excel at turning them into ballon animals.

Is this you?

You conservatives sure became bitter after your loss. You should seek medical attention and pharmaceutical relief

[ExFlyer]

14 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Instead of just bending facts, you and your colleagues excel at turning them into ballon animals.

Is this you?

Now that is funny..... it looks like you and your colleagues found something to do with all those used condoms LOL

Edited September 4, 2025 by ExFlyer

[Venandi]

39 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

...it looks like you and your colleagues found something to do with all those used condoms LOL

If only your father had taken up the hobby...

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, Venandi said:

If only your father had taken up the hobby...

You bring it up and it looks like you and your colleagues found something to do with all those used condoms LOL

You must be taking lessons on how to be stupid form confux LOL

Edited September 4, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CouchPotato]

On 9/3/2025 at 6:47 PM, CdnFox said:

You mean other than he shot him.  And he was crippled for life.  As i pointed out and is easily verified. 

Did you think he used one of those magic curving bullets where you point in ANOTHER direction and it hits the guy you aimed at?

Maybe he means you can't merely point a gun at someone.  You need a 'lawful reason' like "I really wanna kill this guy." Once you've shot him it becomes ok.

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

There should be huge leeway for someone causing violence against someone who breaks into your home.  Outside of torture or some other odd extreme cruelty i think any violence is fair game.  If you're shot leaving the property who cares.  Police would have done the same thing trying to stop them in an arrest if the suspect ran.

Maybe PPs law is even correct here who knows, I just think he's an opportunist doing theater here. 

SO he may be doing the right thing but if PP does the right thing you say he's an 'opportunist'.  

There is no world where anything that guy could possibly do would be 'good' in your eyes. If he solved world hunger and brought about world peace you'd just call him a show off. 

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

You conservatives sure became bitter after your loss. You should seek medical attention and pharmaceutical relief

Nobody mentioned the loss. 

What's weird is that you're so bitter about the win  

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

You bring it up and it looks like you and your colleagues found something to do with all those used condoms LOL

You must be taking lessons on how to be stupid form confux LOL

Aww muffin, is that the only pet your mommy would let you have? Bet she regrets not putting those to other uses now that she has you   

[Venandi]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

You must be taking lessons on how to be stupid form confux LOL

Did you think you were the only one who had the right to do that?

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope...it is all about you and your ilk the confux crybaby??? LOL

Don't foist your nicknames on me  ex-crier  

[Venandi]

Here's another one:

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/markham-home-invasion-kidnapping?itm_source=top-news

Some may rightly argue that the statistical likelihood of this happening to any particular individual is low but it's a pretty emotional issue... violent attacks in the one place most people feel (and should expect to feel) safe tends to resonate across the board.

I'm starting to wonder if otherwise law abiding people will begin arming themselves illegally out of fear and sense of "being left to fend for themselves." Not all response times are quick in all areas and that sense of fear, frustration, and abandonment can cause people to act in ways they otherwise wouldn't... if so, it's likely to make the overall situation worse as opposed to better. 

It's not unreasonable to suspect that the average father/husband would be willing to do to more to protect his family in his own home than he likely would in other areas of everyday life.

I'm thinking this should be nipped in the bud in a very public way; full disclosure on day one of any event, absolutely zero instances of bail for home invasions, and heavy sentences expedited in quick time through the courts... and I mean quick time, night court if required.

Were I a politician with the power to effect change, I would want this grabbed by the throat and shaken vigorously in a very public and open manner. If I were a liberal politician I'd be even more motivated in order for my gun grab efforts not to be seen for the ridiculous sham and waste of money that they are. Two billion dollars spent to solve a non-existent problem whilst a real one goes poorly managed in a highly publicized manner wouldn't be something I wouldn't want to carry into the next election. 

 

 

 

Edited September 5, 2025 by Venandi

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody mentioned the loss. 

What's weird is that you're so bitter about the win  

Everything you guys do is diss the government and it is only because you are in second place..... first place among the LOSERS LOL

 

Edited September 5, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Don't foist your nicknames on me  ex-crier  

It's no nickname...it's a fact LOL

 

Edited September 5, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

10 hours ago, Venandi said:

Did you think you were the only one who had the right to do that?

Oh no...making condom animals are a hobby of you repolitics conservatives.... because you have nothing else to do except to blow hot air into them LOL

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Aww muffin, is that the only pet your mommy would let you have? Bet she regrets not putting those to other uses now that she has you   

Hey..... it is you guys that brought it up. You and verandah must be the masters of used condom inflation LOL

 

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, Venandi said:

Did you think you were the only one who had the right to do that?

Do what? Take lessons on being stupid??

Naw, that is purely a confux colleagues and lately...shady too LOL

 

Edited September 5, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

20 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

WTF kind of babble is that???

Accurate and truthful babble   You misused the word entirely  LOLOLOL

Honestly i don't now how many times i've told you not to use words you don't understand, but in that case it was REALLY funny because you really do have no self denial    

Nice hair you've got there btw  

[Venandi]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Naw, that is purely a confux colleagues and lately...shady too LOL

Yes, your presence here seems to be creating converts.... stay the course, you're winning.

I'm starting to think you work for the conservative party. I'd hire you. 

[Venandi]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nice hair you've got there btw  

It used to be a cat... ExFlyer now calls it "ExPet".

It seems his wife has identified the problem though.

[CdnFox]

18 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

Maybe he means you can't merely point a gun at someone.  You need a 'lawful reason' like "I really wanna kill this guy." Once you've shot him it becomes ok.

LOL well possibly  

But you absolutely can point a gun at someone with lawful reason and if necessary shoot them.  That is 100 percent canadian law and there's tonnes of cases to back it up

The problem is that you may be put through a legal wringer by prosecutors that want to send a message to people that you better not do this even if it's legal.  That kind of 'punishment by proceess' is what the conservatives would be trying to stop by placing the onus on the prosecutor to prove that it was unreasonable and settting the bar for 'reasonableness' higher

[Venandi]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

You and verandah must be the masters of used condom inflation LOL

Did you mean Venanduh or are you drinking Listerine on the deck of a "roofed platform along the outside of your hut"?

Your condom obsession probably means you're still upset about the breakup with Herb... so, here's a limerick to lick until you two makeup.

Dearest Fly-hole in the weeds,

Of caustic words and evil deeds,

Your reputation far exceeds,

Your lack of knowledge, sense and deeds.

Edited September 5, 2025 by Venandi

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

 babble   Y

Honestly i don't now how many times i've told you .

Not to babble your BS  bit he, you don't listen well LOL

 

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, Venandi said:

Yes, your presence here seems to be creating converts.... stay the course, you're winning.

I'm starting to think you work for the conservative party. I'd hire you. 

Yup...converts like shasty, confux, and now you, verandahh

I do...and that makes your party look even more foolish than your leader makes it out to be LOL

 

 

[Venandi]

10 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Not to babble your BS  bit he

Not very good at this are ya. Your "bit he" is currently operating below nominal.

Maybe you should stick to feeding Ritz Crackers to the mouse that lives under your “verandah.” Be careful about spilling Listerine through the space in those boards on the deck though, it’s toxic to mice.

Apparently the lateral shrinkage of wood is a function of age… right Herb?

10 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

...you don't listen well LOL

Your wife (with the orange hair) seems a bit insulting but maybe she's onto something with her assessment. Apparently you don't listen too well either.

Edited September 5, 2025 by Venandi

[ExFlyer]

55 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Did you mean Venanduh

Your condom obsession 

Yeah...venandumb...that is you isn't it?

As for condoms...seems to me it was you that began that little tit for tat so, it kind makes it your obsession LOL