Job market barely budges in July, past revisions signal warning for economy

[gatomontes99]

53 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Flipping a coin 50 times, it's not that unusual for 60/ 40 split. And not evidence of malfeasance. 

2. You have to have evidence that there was cheating.

You might be getting the point now. 100% of the coin flips went to the Ds. That is evidence. 

[Michael Hardner]

14 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You might be getting the point now. 100% of the coin flips went to the Ds. That is evidence. 

But as I pointed out, the adjustment went the same way for Biden as Trump.

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

But as I pointed out, the adjustment went the same way for Biden as Trump.

No. it is going the opposite way. Brandon was getting higher than actual jobs numbers that would get revised down. Trumpnis getting lower than actual numbers that get revised up.

[Michael Hardner]

5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. it is going the opposite way. Brandon was getting higher than actual jobs numbers that would get revised down. Trumpnis getting lower than actual numbers that get revised up.

You are mistaken unfortunately. 

May and June were revised down as per this article:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/01/jobs-report-july-trump-tariffs-trade-war

[Shady]

On 8/2/2025 at 2:46 PM, robosmith said:

Trump is RESPONSIBLE for that revision with his ERRATIC TRADEWAR BEHAVIOR. 

Do you know ANYTHING about how the BLS gathers its data?

TWO SURVEYS. 

1. Businesses hires

2. Citizens working jobs.

AKA always the SAME methods. Duh

Trump wasn’t in office in September of 2024 when the second largest job revision in American history took place.  Largest revision ever other than in 1968.  She pumped up job numbers for several months to help Biden/Harris, and then had to revise almost a million jobs out of existence.  
The worst part of th recent revisions is that if these lower numbers over the last few months are accurate, the federal reserve most likely would have cut interest rates which have remained unusually high.  She literally postponed interest rate cuts because of her inaccurate assessments.

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, Shady said:

Trump wasn’t in office in September of 2024 when the second largest job revision in American history took place.  Largest revision ever other than in 1968.  She pumped up job numbers for several months to help Biden/Harris, and then had to revise almost a million jobs out of existence.  
The worst part of th recent revisions is that if these lower numbers over the last few months are accurate, the federal reserve most likely would have cut interest rates which have remained unusually high.  She literally postponed interest rate cuts because of her inaccurate assessments.

Prove the surveys taken were did not contain the numbers reported. YOU CANNOT.