Jump to content

Supreme Court rules that woke federal judges cannot just halt executive branch business through nonsensical injunctions


Recommended Posts

  • West changed the title to Supreme Court rules that woke federal judges cannot just halt executive branch business through nonsensical injunctions
Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/final-day-scotus-decisions-brings-wave-history-making-rulings

Looks like far left activists on the bench are wrong when they issue nonsensical injunctions on the Trump administration 

Except ruling according the clear meaning of the Constitution has NEVER BEEN "nonsensical."

What the SCOTUS actually ruled is that a simple district court injunction can only apply to the litigants and district in which it was rendered.

They also mentioned that it would take a class action case to make a ruling with wide spread applicability.

Of course what they really want, is ONLY THEIR RULING to apply nationwide and that's exactly what has happened repeatedly in the PAST, like when Biden forgave Federal student loans.

IOW, you never understood nor probably even read the ruling.

You only look like a FOOL when you keep posting stories with NO CREDIBILITY from FOS LIES.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Except ruling according the clear meaning of the Constitution has NEVER BEEN "nonsensical."

What the SCOTUS actually ruled is that a simple district court injunction can only apply to the litigants and district in which it was rendered.

They also mentioned that it would take a class action case to make a ruling with wide spread applicability.

Of course what they really want, is ONLY THEIR RULING to apply nationwide and that's exactly what has happened repeatedly in the PAST, like when Biden forgave Federal student loans.

IOW, you never understood nor probably even read the ruling.

You only look like a FOOL when you keep posting stories with NO CREDIBILITY from FOS LIES.

It's called the Supreme Court for a reason. Duh 

Posted
On 6/28/2025 at 11:50 AM, robosmith said:

Too bad you didn't understand what the ruling says and MEANS. DUH

He seems to understand it better than you. All you did was repeat what he said.

The ruling absolutely does limit judicial activists from making sweeping rulings with regards to trump or any other matter.

So he understands it just fine. You basically repeated the ruling correctly and yet you still don't understand it.

This will severely limit the lower courts ability to interfere with trump or future presidents.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...