West Posted June 28, 2025 Report Posted June 28, 2025 (edited) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/final-day-scotus-decisions-brings-wave-history-making-rulings Looks like far left activists on the bench are wrong when they issue nonsensical injunctions on the Trump administration Edited June 28, 2025 by West 1 Quote
Deluge Posted June 28, 2025 Report Posted June 28, 2025 1 hour ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/final-day-scotus-decisions-brings-wave-history-making-rulings Looks like far left activists on the bench are wrong when they issue nonsensical injunctions on the Trump administration That should go without saying. It's sad that we have to bring the SC in to execute justice. Quote
robosmith Posted June 28, 2025 Report Posted June 28, 2025 3 hours ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/final-day-scotus-decisions-brings-wave-history-making-rulings Looks like far left activists on the bench are wrong when they issue nonsensical injunctions on the Trump administration Except ruling according the clear meaning of the Constitution has NEVER BEEN "nonsensical." What the SCOTUS actually ruled is that a simple district court injunction can only apply to the litigants and district in which it was rendered. They also mentioned that it would take a class action case to make a ruling with wide spread applicability. Of course what they really want, is ONLY THEIR RULING to apply nationwide and that's exactly what has happened repeatedly in the PAST, like when Biden forgave Federal student loans. IOW, you never understood nor probably even read the ruling. You only look like a FOOL when you keep posting stories with NO CREDIBILITY from FOS LIES. Quote
West Posted June 28, 2025 Author Report Posted June 28, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Except ruling according the clear meaning of the Constitution has NEVER BEEN "nonsensical." What the SCOTUS actually ruled is that a simple district court injunction can only apply to the litigants and district in which it was rendered. They also mentioned that it would take a class action case to make a ruling with wide spread applicability. Of course what they really want, is ONLY THEIR RULING to apply nationwide and that's exactly what has happened repeatedly in the PAST, like when Biden forgave Federal student loans. IOW, you never understood nor probably even read the ruling. You only look like a FOOL when you keep posting stories with NO CREDIBILITY from FOS LIES. It's called the Supreme Court for a reason. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted June 28, 2025 Report Posted June 28, 2025 21 minutes ago, West said: It's called the Supreme Court for a reason. Duh Too bad you didn't understand what the ruling says and MEANS. DUH Quote
CdnFox Posted June 30, 2025 Report Posted June 30, 2025 On 6/28/2025 at 11:50 AM, robosmith said: Too bad you didn't understand what the ruling says and MEANS. DUH He seems to understand it better than you. All you did was repeat what he said. The ruling absolutely does limit judicial activists from making sweeping rulings with regards to trump or any other matter. So he understands it just fine. You basically repeated the ruling correctly and yet you still don't understand it. This will severely limit the lower courts ability to interfere with trump or future presidents. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.