gatomontes99 Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) It's really more of a story time with DOGE, but it is very enlightening. The Institute for Peace has a cache of weapons, was paying the Taliban and deleted 1TB of data to avoid scrutiny. The government retirement paperwork is finally on a computer (no more shopping carts with paperwork). The Department of Education was renting stadiums and Ceasar's Palace for parties (but stopped when receipts were required). There is more. It is amazing what they are finding and stopping. I can't wait for the referrals and trials to begin. **If you watch nothing else, watch the part where they talk about Pandas. Edited 18 hours ago by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Fluffypants Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago The government is perfect and pure all Trumps is doing is take money from saving children and killing grandma because we see Trump as a Captain Planet Villain that just does things because its EVIL with no other motivations whatsoever other than that. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago No other point of view required I guess. So why has DOGE been fired? Where are the Trillions in savings? Oh well... Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: It's really more of a story time with DOGE, but it is very enlightening. The Institute for Peace has a cache of weapons, was paying the Taliban and deleted 1TB of data to avoid scrutiny. The government retirement paperwork is finally on a computer (no more shopping carts with paperwork). The Department of Education was renting stadiums and Ceasar's Palace for parties (but stopped when receipts were required). There is more. It is amazing what they are finding and stopping. I can't wait for the referrals and trials to begin. **If you watch nothing else, watch the part where they talk about Pandas. Nope, NOT enlightening at all except that you post broken links. Quote
User Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: No other point of view required I guess. So why has DOGE been fired? Where are the Trillions in savings? Oh well... Who said no other point of view required? If you really think that why are you here offering one? Where was DOGE fired? So, if there were not Trillions in savings any of the savings so far are bad? Oh well... 1 Quote
Matthew Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 16 minutes ago, User said: if there were not Trillions in savings For all the theatrics, chaos, costly economic uncertainly, and privacy violations caused by the entire DOGE stunt, the actual budget savings is practically nonexistent. Has there even been $1 billion in savings from anything (let alone fraud and waste)? Literally everything trump and musk teams have claimed about DOGE savings has so far turned out been a lie. Edited 13 hours ago by Matthew Quote
User Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Just now, Matthew said: For all the theatrics, chaos, costly economic uncertainly, and privacy violations caused by the entire DOGE stunt, the actual budget savings is practically nonexistent. Has there even been $1 billion in savings from admiring (let alone fraud and waste)? Literally everything trump and musk teams have claimed about DOGE savings has so far turned out been a lie. Practically nonexistent... is a lie. If you have to ask if there was even 1 billion in savings, how are you able to proclaim the savings were practically nonexistent? Folks like you have no regard for facts or having any integrity in these discussions. Quote
Matthew Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 12 minutes ago, User said: how are you able to proclaim the savings were practically nonexistent? Because the maybe 1 billion is half of a percent of what they claimed they were going to be able to do and more like a negligible quarter of a percent of actual federal spending. Quote
User Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 minute ago, Matthew said: Because the maybe 1 billion is half of a percent of what they claimed they were going to be able to do and more like a negligible quarter of a percent of actual federal spending. You have yet to provide any source for your claim that they have maybe saved only 1 billion. That is so obviously absurdly false on its face. Quote
Matthew Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Just now, User said: You have yet to provide any source for your claim that they have maybe saved only 1 billion. I'm questioning whether even a billon in savings has been confirmed. I don't need a source to ask a question lol. What we do know is that the doge bs has been wasteful--taxpayers paying hundreds of millions to fire and rehire tens of thousands of people. 75,000 buyouts involving 8 months of full pay and benefits (while doing no work). Meanwhile cutting 40% of the IRS which will mean hundreds of billions in lost revenue from lack of enforcement of tax law. And these are just a few simple direct costs. 1 Quote
User Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Matthew said: I'm questioning whether even a billon in savings has been confirmed. I don't need a source to ask a question lol. What we do know is that the doge bs has been wasteful--taxpayers paying hundreds of millions to fire and rehire tens of thousands of people. 75,000 buyouts involving 8 months of full pay and benefits (while doing no work). Meanwhile cutting 40% of the IRS which will mean hundreds of billions in lost revenue from lack of enforcement of tax law. And these are just a few simple direct costs. No, you did not just ask the question, you asserted: "the actual budget savings is practically nonexistent." This is not a question either: "Because the maybe 1 billion is half of a percent of what they claimed they were going to be able to do and more like a negligible quarter of a percent of actual federal spending." Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 6 hours ago Author Report Posted 6 hours ago 7 hours ago, robosmith said: Nope, NOT enlightening at all except that you post broken links. Looks like a you problem. Everyone else is seeing it. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 12 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: It's really more of a story time with DOGE That's right. Just a bunch of boobs sitting around a table telling stories that no one outside of the MAGA CULT believes. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: That's right. Just a bunch of boobs sitting around a table telling stories that no one outside of the MAGA CULT believes. Lmao.. ok. So you tried to make it about me and when that back fired you just decided to call them names, as if you are a child. So, here's the deal. You've come down on the side of a known MS13 gang member that beat his wife and smuggled people, massive government waste and a forever war in Ukraine. All because Orange Man bad. You do you slick. Edited 5 hours ago by gatomontes99 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.