Democrats & Aliens vs. the USA.

[Deluge]

Quantifying Why Democrats Support Open Borders

A Center for Immigration Studies report released today quantifies why Democrats support, or are indifferent to, open borders. The figures underlying the study may stun even the strongest proponents of border security. The net effect of increases in both legal and illegal immigration in the 2020 Census shifted 17 House seats and 17 Electoral College votes, resulting in a net gain of 14 seats in Blue States — ten seats shifting from red states and four from battleground states. That Democratic net gain is greater than the respective electoral votes of all but ten states. In part because districts with high percentages of noncitizens tend to vote Democrat, “of the 24 districts where one in five adults is not an American citizen, 20 were won by a Democrat in 2022. In contrast, the Democrat won in just five of the 54 districts where 98 percent of adults are citizens.” Millions of illegal aliens have flooded the country during the Biden presidency. An indeterminate number — estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands — have been flown into the country by the Biden administration and deposited in certain jurisdictions. Increasingly, Democrats needn’t be concerned about persuading American voters. They’ve gained electoral votes by the addition — strategic or otherwise — of illegal immigrants. This is a “fundamental transformation” of the country.

https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117827/documents/HHRG-119-JU01-20250122-SD011.pdf

[Deluge]

This means that the democrats have indeed been trying to increase their voter base through illegal immigration. 

Is this not an act of war? 

[robosmith]

Hilarious that you believe the RepubliCON House is a source of objective reporting. LMAO

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Hilarious that you believe the RepubliCON House is a source of objective reporting. LMAO

With this subject it is. 

You and I both know that the democrats want to make illegal immigration a thing, so what in the f*ck are you prattling about? 

[herbie]

No matter how reprehensible or disgusting anyMAGA  claim or action is, this guy will support it.
The only 'Deluge' is the overflow of bowel contents into his cranium.

[robosmith]

31 minutes ago, Deluge said:

With this subject it is. 

You and I both know that the democrats want to make illegal immigration a thing, so what in the f*ck are you prattling about? 

It has NEVER been a "thing" among Democrats. Allowing ASYLUM claims makes it LEGAL.

WTF are YOU BULLSHITTING about?

[Legato]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It has NEVER been a "thing" among Democrats. Allowing ASYLUM claims makes it LEGAL.

WTF are YOU BULLSHITTING about?

So the Rio Grande is a border crossing?

 

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. It has NEVER been a "thing" among Democrats.

2. Allowing ASYLUM claims makes it LEGAL.

3. WTF are YOU BULLSHITTING about?

1. Sure it has. EVERYONE qualifies for asylum in your f*cked up world, which is why that piece of shit judge tried to order the plane full of illegal alien gangbangers back from El Salvador. lol

2. Wrong again, pervert. Asylum claims filed from the Mexico side of the border makes it legal. Everyone else is a criminal invader who needs his ass kicked out of the country. 

3. Oh, there's no bullshit, pervert. We all know you America hating psychopaths want the borders dissolved. It's why millions of scumbags bumrushed our border the second the illegitimate Joe Biden took office. lol

[Deluge]

35 minutes ago, Legato said:

So the Rio Grande is a border crossing?

 

The US has no borders. 

-- robomarx

Edited April 7 by Deluge

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

No matter how reprehensible or disgusting anyMAGA  claim or action is, this guy will support it.
The only 'Deluge' is the overflow of bowel contents into his cranium.

Another open borders slut screeching its objection. lol

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Hilarious that you believe the RepubliCON House is a source of objective reporting. LMAO

Rule #1

1 hour ago, herbie said:

No matter how reprehensible or disgusting anyMAGA  claim or action is, this guy will support it.
The only 'Deluge' is the overflow of bowel contents into his cranium.

Rule #2

Do you see why we don't respect anything you say? You follow a very predictable script. So predictable that I was able to put it in my signature months in advance.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

So the Rio Grande is a border crossing?

Of course it is, if you're on foot and it's a hundred miles to an official one.

The LAW says once you're on US territory, you have the right to apply for asylum.

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Of course it is, if you're on foot and it's a hundred miles to an official one.

The LAW says once you're on US territory, you have the right to apply for asylum.

Sorry, dipshit, the LAW doesn't reward people for BREAKING THE LAW. 

Your illegal pals will just have to stand in line with everyone else at the nearest POE. 

Edited April 7 by Deluge

[Legato]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Of course it is, if you're on foot and it's a hundred miles to an official one.

The LAW says once you're on US territory, you have the right to apply for asylum.

Whether you're on foot, donkey, camel or burning Tesla, the whole Rio Grande is not recognised as a legal port of entry.

[robosmith]

42 minutes ago, Legato said:

Whether you're on foot, donkey, camel or burning Tesla, the whole Rio Grande is not recognised as a legal port of entry.

What part of "once you're in the US," do you not understand?

[Deluge]

36 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What part of "once you're in the US," do you not understand?

What part of "8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien" do you not understand? 

Once an alien crosses the border illegally there's no such thing as "once you're in the US". There's only, "Turn your ass around and leave the country or we will help you leave the country". 

[Legato]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

What part of "once you're in the US," do you not understand?

and the lights all went out in San Francisco

Wait a sec I'll get you a candle.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

and the lights all went out in San Francisco

Wait a sec I'll get you a candle.

Your TROLLING makes no sense, FOOL.

ABA Legal Fact Check: Exploration of legalities of asylum

Quote

Under the law, with some exceptions for national security or criminal conduct, asylum seekers who make it to a U.S. port of entry or inside the United States have a right to a hearing with a claims officer and certain other protections. At the hearing, asylum seekers typically are asked a series of questions, including whether they have a fear of returning to their country. If they say that they do, then they are required to undergo what’s called a credible fear interview conducted by an asylum officer. If the officer finds that the applicant does not have a credible fear, the asylum seeker can request to have that determination reviewed by an immigration judge in an expedited fashion.

 

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your TROLLING makes no sense, FOOL.

Sorry f*ckface, your allies don't have a right to break into this country and tell the US what to do. 

The appropriate response to a break-in is shoot the intruder, or take finger prints and kick their asses out of the country. 

[Deluge]

We beat the democrats in the presidential election, but that's not keeping them from trying to destroy this country. 

We may have to start revoking citizenships. It could be a 1+1 deal: for every illegal alien that we kick out of the country, we can throw a democrat out as well. 

[Deluge]

Update on the democrat party's war on America. 

 

[Deluge]

How desperate do democrats have to be for illegal immigration?

We've heard robocrow and other racists talk about how desperate they are for slave labor in this country, and we know they think they can grow an entirely new voter base with criminal invaders, but is there any other reason they need it, or is it just those two reasons?