ironstone Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Again, you are just making shit up. Nobody is trying to keep undocumented criminals in the US -- well, except perhaps for the for-profit prison system. But the idea that mayors are doing anything of the sort is pure fantasy. I'm going to take this as a tacit admission that you have no idea why "sanctuary" cities and states exist. Go educate yourself on the facts. https://abcnews.go.com/US/immigration-litigation-prepared-advocacy-groups-democratic-leaders/story?id=115915848 Immigration advocacy groups and Democratic leaders are seeking to disrupt President-elect Donald Trump's plan to deport millions of undocumented immigrants by pre-drafting lawsuits that could be filed as soon as he takes office. https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/17/protecting-terrorists-is-just-the-latest-of-judge-boasbergs-partisan-activism/ Last year, President Joe Biden’s administration designated Tren de Aragua a transnational criminal organization, meaning this was not just a Trump thing. Everyone agrees, Tren De Aragua are bad hombres. Who could be opposed to removing terrorists from the U.S.? Hardcore Democrats who passed the bar exam and are still hellbent on seeing Trump fail. Even if it means a few more daughters are raped and killed by terrorist gangs. By Saturday, opposition to terrorist deportation surfaced from the anti-American ACLU and the far left lawfare firm, Democracy Forward, led by Marc Elias (he has an entire page at The Federalist). The meddling attorneys whipped up a complaint and went to Old Faithful, Judge Boasberg. They asked for a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump Administration from the deportation. How these people entered the US is in itself an illegal act. Technically, all of them are criminals. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Hodad Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 52 minutes ago, ironstone said: https://abcnews.go.com/US/immigration-litigation-prepared-advocacy-groups-democratic-leaders/story?id=115915848 Immigration advocacy groups and Democratic leaders are seeking to disrupt President-elect Donald Trump's plan to deport millions of undocumented immigrants by pre-drafting lawsuits that could be filed as soon as he takes office. https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/17/protecting-terrorists-is-just-the-latest-of-judge-boasbergs-partisan-activism/ Last year, President Joe Biden’s administration designated Tren de Aragua a transnational criminal organization, meaning this was not just a Trump thing. Everyone agrees, Tren De Aragua are bad hombres. Who could be opposed to removing terrorists from the U.S.? Hardcore Democrats who passed the bar exam and are still hellbent on seeing Trump fail. Even if it means a few more daughters are raped and killed by terrorist gangs. By Saturday, opposition to terrorist deportation surfaced from the anti-American ACLU and the far left lawfare firm, Democracy Forward, led by Marc Elias (he has an entire page at The Federalist). The meddling attorneys whipped up a complaint and went to Old Faithful, Judge Boasberg. They asked for a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump Administration from the deportation. How these people entered the US is in itself an illegal act. Technically, all of them are criminals. It's funny that a publication that calls itself "The Federalist" has so thoroughly lost the thread that it does not believe in the concept of a nation of laws. MAGA madness is in full swing. Also noticed that you took a hard pass on the "sanctuary city" learning. That's too bad. Quote
User Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 15 minutes ago, Hodad said: It's funny that a publication that calls itself "The Federalist" has so thoroughly lost the thread that it does not believe in the concept of a nation of laws. MAGA madness is in full swing. Also noticed that you took a hard pass on the "sanctuary city" learning. That's too bad. It is too bad that you have me on ignore because you can't deal with my comments. I pointed out the absurdity of your comment on sanctuary cities. If you are so desperate for a response and engagement, stop hiding from me. Quote
ironstone Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Also noticed that you took a hard pass on the "sanctuary city" learning. That's too bad. They don't cooperate fully with the feds on immigration law. They can ignore immigration laws they don't like? But I thought 'nobody is above the law'? Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
robosmith Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 (edited) 6 hours ago, ironstone said: Didn't these people break a law by entering the country illegally in the first place? Is it a nation of laws when Democrat run cities try to prevent ICE from apprehending illegal aliens? What is the issue here? Obama deported more people than Trump did in his first term. Is the issue of deportation different depending on who is doing it? Many of those ALLEGED gang members did NOT have a deportation order from a COURT. Trump does NOT have that authority. Live updates: Trump's deportation orders under scrutiny by ... AP News https://apnews.com › live › donald-trump-news-updates... 1 hour ago — The Trump administration transferred more than 200 immigrants to El Salvador even as a federal judge issued an order to bar the deportations Nor evidence against them certified in COURT that they were in FACT members of a terrorist gang. Edited March 17 by robosmith Quote
robosmith Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Like your head? Like your honour? Like your morality? Like your patriotism? OK...I get it... No, LIKE YOUR CAPITULATION "arguments." Duh Such as stringing together meaningless name calling, which as Trump does, accuses others of YOUR OWN DEFECTS. LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 4 hours ago, ironstone said: That's a unique way of aiding and abetting lol. Except it's not aiding nor abetting. And it's NOT aiding nor abetting Federal LEO to do their jobs. AKS doing nothing about it. 4 hours ago, ironstone said: I'm sure Tren de aragua members are eternally grateful to the sanctuary city(Democrat) mayors that are trying to keep them in the US. Doing nothing is NOT trying. Duh Quote
User Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: Many of those ALLEGED gang members did NOT have a deportation order from a COURT. Trump does NOT have that authority. Except, he does. He declared them an threat to our nation according to the Alien Enemies Act. Quote
ironstone Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 42 minutes ago, robosmith said: Doing nothing is NOT trying. Duh 'Doing-nothing-is-not-trying' So your logic is, if one knows exactly where tren de aragua members are, but you say nothing to ICE agents...that doesn't meet the threshold of trying to keep them in the US? Doesn't qualify as aiding and abetting criminals? 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
User Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ironstone said: 'Doing-nothing-is-not-trying' So your logic is, if one knows exactly where tren de aragua members are, but you say nothing to ICE agents...that doesn't meet the threshold of trying to keep them in the US? Doesn't qualify as aiding and abetting criminals? It is simply amazing. Trump is destroying the Democrats. They are fighting to keep criminal illegal alien gang members in the country now and want to force dudes into womens locker rooms. These are the hills they are dying on now. Crazy. Edited March 18 by User Quote
Hodad Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, ironstone said: They don't cooperate fully with the feds on immigration law. They can ignore immigration laws they don't like? But I thought 'nobody is above the law'? Jeebus, dude, just even a basic understanding of the situation would go miles. They are NOT ignoring laws they don't like. They are "ignoring" laws they have no obligation or responsibility to enforce. It's not they job. And voluntarily enforcing those laws makes doing their actual jobs much harder. 1 Quote
User Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 4 minutes ago, Hodad said: Jeebus, dude, just even a basic understanding of the situation would go miles. They are NOT ignoring laws they don't like. They are "ignoring" laws they have no obligation or responsibility to enforce. It's not they job. And voluntarily enforcing those laws makes doing their actual jobs much harder. Sure. We get it. You can stand there and watch someone get raped. Not your problem. You don't have to care. It is exactly what almost happened to people like Laken Riley, she was killed instead. You don't care. I would love to see your brain-dead twisted logic in explaining how letting a known violent, illegal alien gang member go back into their community is somehow making their jobs easier. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.