Hodad Posted January 22 Report Posted January 22 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It is the left doing what the left does. We have less than two years to get shìt done. Forget her. We've got more important stuff to do like getting Pam in her office, asap. Thanks for bringing this thread full circle. Republicans, who allegedly don't like pedophiles, are champing at the bit to get Pam Bondi in office, who famously let Trump's rich pedophile buddy off the hook in Florida. In the Trump era, truth is almost always stranger than fiction. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 46 minutes ago, Hodad said: Thanks for bringing this thread full circle. Republicans, who allegedly don't like pedophiles, are champing at the bit to get Pam Bondi in office, who famously let Trump's rich pedophile buddy off the hook in Florida. In the Trump era, truth is almost always stranger than fiction. Wow. You are firmly ensconced in that fantasy land, aren't you? What pedophile friend? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 24 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Wow. You are firmly ensconced in that fantasy land, aren't you? What pedophile friend? Epstein. Bondi let him off the hook in a deal nobody understands. It's been suggested that there were favors or bribery involved. It's that weird. You should look it up so you know something about these people you're swooning over. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Hodad said: Epstein. Bondi let him off the hook in a deal nobody understands. It's been suggested that there were favors or bribery involved. It's that weird. You should look it up so you know something about these people you're swooning over. You guys suggest a lot of b.s. I put no stock in it. I think it's very interesting that she's literally saying there is no legal basis for with holding his client list while you guys are saying she's protecting him. Those two actions don't add up. Oh...BTW...this article is pretty extensive. NBC The article never once names Bondi. It puts most of the blame (via innuendo) on Acosta. So, no, Bondi didn't let Epstein slide. Edited January 23 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 (edited) 13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You guys suggest a lot of b.s. I put no stock in it. I think it's very interesting that she's literally saying there is no legal basis for with holding his client list while you guys are saying she's protecting him. Those two actions don't add up. Dude, Alex Acosta (appointed in Trump's last term) literally made the Epstein sweetheart deal. Literally let him go. Bondi didn't prosecute. I mean, a pedophile enabler is an upgrade from Gaetz, in that she's not herself a pedophile, but it continues to undermine WCM's absurd premise. Then there's also that little matter of Bondi dropping the Trump University fraud after the $25k donation from the Trump Foundation (which was also dissolved for fraud). But it wouldn't be a Trump administration if it weren't packed with corrupt lackeys. Edited January 23 by Hodad Quote
CdnFox Posted January 23 Report Posted January 23 18 minutes ago, Hodad said: Dude, Alex Acosta (appointed in Trump's last term) literally made the Epstein sweetheart deal. Literally let him go. Bondi didn't prosecute. Oh you mean that case where the guy actually did plead guilty to a crime as part of the deal and when the decisions were investigated it was found that there was no wrongdoing whatsoever, other than she forgot to notify some of the families involved. It was determined that her actions had absolutely no wrongdoing. And the guy was in fact convicted of a crime. So more lying on your part. Obviously she felt she had a potentially weak case and took the guaranteed route of a confession for a slightly reduced crime rather than risk everything on a trial and the investigation found that that was appropriate. The investigation specifically did not find any indication that it was some sort of sweetheart deal or that there was any inappropriate influence Pretend not to have seen this and will ignore it. The reason for that is because he prefers his lies to the facts and when somebody presents him with facts he simply tunes it out. But she did nothing wrong in that case, she exercised her best judgment and she did get a conviction even if it was for a lesser charge and the guy did go to jail Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.