WestCanMan Posted October 22, 2024 Report Posted October 22, 2024 Even Dem supporters would admit that Kamala isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. Their ideal candidate wouldn't have slept with a really old man to get her first two political appointments. They wouldn't have a sorry record of jailing black men using Joe's racist laws. They'd be able to speak to reporters any day, any time: they wouldn't have to run from friendly reporters or even Fox reporters. They would be able to speak without a teleprompter. They would be able to answer questions directly. They'd have a solid record of always espousing the same ideas, they wouldn't have done a complete 180° shift on several major policy positions at 56 years old. They wouldn't be coming off of 4 years of abject failure, they'd have some solid successes in their recent political history to brag about. The Dems are running a clusterfork of a hard-core dunce with a dismal record of failure against a former president who ran an extremely successful economy, a secure border and brought the world to peace at an unprecedented level (Abraham Accords), and the Dems are barely losing. If the Dems, with all their MSM and social media clout, ran a completely mediocre candidate they'd be at 80% in the polls right now. That's scary. America needs to do better than just belch out a mediocre president in 2028. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
NAME REMOVED Posted October 22, 2024 Report Posted October 22, 2024 Harris is now losing in most swing states. If the election were held today, Trump would won. This is very interesting, considering there is absolutely no way Trump's cognitive abilities are strong enough to last until 2029. At what point will Trump be forced to step down? Get used to your new President, America: The Democrats blew it again. All they had to do was not elect a weak candidate. However, just like 2016, they chose a loser. 1 1 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted October 22, 2024 Report Posted October 22, 2024 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Even Dem supporters would admit that Kamala isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. Harris is very intelligent. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Their ideal candidate wouldn't have slept with a really old man to get her first two political appointments. This is just good old fashioned misogamy. Do better. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: They wouldn't have a sorry record of jailing black men using Joe's racist laws. The republicans and red states jail far more black people than blue states, especially wrongfully convicted black men. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: They'd be able to speak to reporters any day, any time: they wouldn't have to run from friendly reporters or even Fox reporters. Trump is the one refusing to debate, or given many interviews. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: They'd have a solid record of always espousing the same ideas, they wouldn't have done a complete 180° shift on several major policy positions at 56 years old. Well I will give you that. Trump is at least consistent. Consistently going bankrupt. Consistently cheating and lying to the American public. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: They wouldn't be coming off of 4 years of abject failure, they'd have some solid successes in their recent political history to brag about. Trump's first term was an unmitigated disaster, and he completely failed. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: The Dems are running a clusterfork of a hard-core dunce with a dismal record of failure against a former president who ran an extremely successful economy, The US economy contracted under Trump. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: a secure border The US-Mexico border is not secure. Anyone studying the border situation knows the wall is a joke. At any time, there are an estimated 80-100 tunnels passing from Mexico to USA, where the cartels smuggle fentanyl and meth, in order to receive semi automatic weapons, and other American goods. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: and brought the world to peace at an unprecedented level (Abraham Accords), and the Dems are barely losing. The Abraham accords was a completely one-sided deal, which screwed over the Palestinians, and probably made them realise at violence was their only option. Also worth noting, that there have been more wars in any given year the World, than at any point in human history. This goes back to the early 2010s. 43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: If the Dems, with all their MSM and social media clout, ran a completely mediocre candidate they'd be at 80% in the polls right now. That's scary. America needs to do better than just belch out a mediocre president in 2028. Well I will give you that. Harris was a very weak candidate, and so was Hilary. Quote
robosmith Posted October 22, 2024 Report Posted October 22, 2024 4 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Even Dem supporters would admit that Kamala isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. Their ideal candidate wouldn't have slept with a really old man to get her first two political appointments. They wouldn't have a sorry record of jailing black men using Joe's racist laws. They'd be able to speak to reporters any day, any time: they wouldn't have to run from friendly reporters or even Fox reporters. They would be able to speak without a teleprompter. They would be able to answer questions directly. They'd have a solid record of always espousing the same ideas, they wouldn't have done a complete 180° shift on several major policy positions at 56 years old. They wouldn't be coming off of 4 years of abject failure, they'd have some solid successes in their recent political history to brag about. The Dems are running a clusterfork of a hard-core dunce with a dismal record of failure against a former president who ran an extremely successful economy, a secure border and brought the world to peace at an unprecedented level (Abraham Accords), and the Dems are barely losing. If the Dems, with all their MSM and social media clout, ran a completely mediocre candidate they'd be at 80% in the polls right now. That's scary. America needs to do better than just belch out a mediocre president in 2028. ALL the things you criticize Harris for ^here are true of Trump and RepubliCONS, but that doesn't bother you cause you are a PARTISAN HACK hoping no one will notice your HYPOCRISY makes you INSINCERE. 3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Harris is very intelligent. This is just good old fashioned misogamy. Do better. The republicans and red states jail far more black people than blue states, especially wrongfully convicted black men. Trump is the one refusing to debate, or given many interviews. Well I will give you that. Trump is at least consistent. Consistently going bankrupt. Consistently cheating and lying to the American public. Trump's first term was an unmitigated disaster, and he completely failed. The US economy contracted under Trump. The US-Mexico border is not secure. Anyone studying the border situation knows the wall is a joke. At any time, there are an estimated 80-100 tunnels passing from Mexico to USA, where the cartels smuggle fentanyl and meth, in order to receive semi automatic weapons, and other American goods. The Abraham accords was a completely one-sided deal, which screwed over the Palestinians, and probably made them realise at violence was their only option. Also worth noting, that there have been more wars in any given year the World, than at any point in human history. This goes back to the early 2010s. Well I will give you that. Harris was a very weak candidate, and so was Hilary. It's misogyny Quote
ironstone Posted October 22, 2024 Report Posted October 22, 2024 13 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Harris is now losing in most swing states. If the election were held today, Trump would won. This is very interesting, considering there is absolutely no way Trump's cognitive abilities are strong enough to last until 2029. At what point will Trump be forced to step down? Get used to your new President, America: The Democrats blew it again. All they had to do was not elect a weak candidate. However, just like 2016, they chose a loser. I'm no doctor but between Trump and Biden, there is only one that really appears to be in cognitive decline and that is Biden. And let's not forget that this man is still the sitting president. It's a fair point to bring up Trump's age but right now there is a huge difference between him and Biden when it comes to cognitive decline. Trump seems to be on the go all the time while Biden takes an awful lot of vacations. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/biden-vacation-40-presidency-153000371.html I would much rather see Trump in the White House than Harris but this race is by no means over. I say that because I'm very wary of the 'ground game' of the Democrats. They are absolutely ruthless when it comes to stacking the deck with things like ballot harvesting or fighting tooth and nail against voter ID requirements. Those handy ballot-drop boxes that received plenty of late night visits from people stuffing ballots into them will once again play a huge role in the election outcome. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
WestCanMan Posted October 22, 2024 Author Report Posted October 22, 2024 14 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Harris is very intelligent. This is just good old fashioned misogamy. Do better. The value of your endorsement is plain to see, for reasons that you obviously don't understand. Quote The republicans and red states jail far more black people than blue states, especially wrongfully convicted black men. Fact: That's just you talking out of your ass Fact: Kamala jailed thousands of black men just for selling weed, using Joe's racist laws Fact: Trump doesn't have a record of jailing black men for no reason, but he did free a bunch of black men and women that Kamala imprisoned unjustly, with the help of Joe's racist laws Quote Trump is the one refusing to debate, or given many interviews. Fact: Trump took a debate on the most unfair terms imaginable, where Trump was falsely fact-checked several times, while Kamala told several blatant lies without being fact-checked even once Fact: Trump has given dozens of interviews, even with the most hostile interviewers of all. Fact: Kamala has only done a few interviews, and all but one has been with the very friendliest hosts she could find, only 1 or 2 were serious in nature, and all of her answers could basically be described as disingenuous, meandering nonsense. She wouldn't even answer ABCs questions: the host had to try 3 times to get her to answer his first question and she just refused and got very angry and rude with him. Quote Well I will give you that. Trump is at least consistent. He was definitely that. It was very refreshing to see a politician do their best to do all of the things that they said they'd do, if elected. Quote Trump's first term was an unmitigated disaster, and he completely failed. That's a blatant lie, but I don't blame you. The truth is very damning, and lying is normal for leftists. Quote The US economy contracted under Trump. That's just more blatant BS from you. The economy contracted because of covid. That's it. Quote The US-Mexico border is not secure. Anyone studying the border situation knows the wall is a joke. At any time, there are an estimated 80-100 tunnels passing from Mexico to USA, where the cartels smuggle fentanyl and meth, in order to receive semi automatic weapons, and other American goods. It's a joke now. A total joke. And mostly because of border czar Harris's failed policies, stupidity and weakness. Quote The Abraham accords was a completely one-sided deal, which screwed over the Palestinians, and probably made them realise at violence was their only option. Trump is an ally of Israel, and signing deals favourable to them was a job well-done. I don't think Gazans profited from their violence. Quote Also worth noting, that there have been more wars in any given year the World, than at any point in human history. This goes back to the early 2010s. Also worth noting: the world is far closer to WWIII than we have ever been, even during the cold war. That's all thanks to Biden. Quote Well I will give you that. Harris was a very weak candidate, She's weak, dumb, incompetent, incoherent, prone to irrational outbursts of anger, and her only redeeming quality is that she's very attractive until she starts talking. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.