Jump to content

Are you a man or a woman?  

20 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You think Biden and Harris were working on your behalf?

I pay out of pocket for insulin for an uninsured loved one and it went from almost $400 per vial down to $30 per vial thanks to the Democrats. Whoever owns the Republicans would never have let that gem through.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

The Black Lives Matter movement grew out of a series of high-profile killings of Black people by police.

 

No, it grew out of one killing, treyvon maron, and that was not by a police officer or even a white person. 

It has taken advantage of every black killing that it could make high profile since under the theory of never letting a good tragedy go to waste when you can profit from it.  The founders were self professed  "trained communists" btw. 

Quote

I'm not sure what this has to do with the Irish?

Oh right, you're doing that thing where you pretend that you forgotten what you were talking about and have no idea of what's going on around you or what you've said in the past.

You claim that it's his always been understood that white lives matter. I pointed out that historically that is not true. I alluded to the Irish because most people over the age of 18 are aware that there was a long history of repression and brutality against Irish people in both Canada and United States and in fact indentured servitude and slavery was even common for extended periods of history.

So no, your comment that white lives have always been understood to matter is false.

And obviously you know that considering your playing your usual game of pretending not to know what's going on around you whenever your cornered on a point.

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

That the US valued Black lives less than White lives is just a matter of the historical record.

Far history perhaps. Certainly not today. Today all lives  matter.  But unfortunately it's hard to make money on the truth, so a couple of communists started organization that pretended that black lives matter more than any other lives and use that organization to milk hundreds of millions of dollars out of Americans and Canadians while promoting violence and bigotry.

All lives matter. The moment you try and separate one races life over another races life all you do is promote bigotry and hatred

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
20 hours ago, Deluge said:

Dumbass, have you not been paying attention? While you stupid b*tches were crying about January 6th, the hair sniffer was flooding this country with illegal aliens. 

While you freaks were having psychotic episodes over your failed court cases and assassination attempts, the hair sniffer was sewing DEI into the very fabric of this country. 

There isn't one f*cking thing you perverts stand for that ISN'T destructive to this country. 

How weak is your argument when you have to resort to insults like this? Are you in grade 8? 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Barquentine said:

How weak is your argument when you have to resort to insults like this? Are you in grade 8? 

Yup. That sums up most of the sad Smeagol-esque right wing losers here. They've lost the power of normal human connection. It's why they hang out here all the time even on holidays and such.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Radiorum said:

And who told you about this fraud, waste and abuse? Lemme guess. Trump and Musk.

And you didn't answer my question.

Who else is going to tell us, professor? USAID sure as hell wasn't going to. Now we wait until the information is public, and then we can all read it together. 

Ask it again, because I'm not going back to find it. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
11 hours ago, Matthew said:

I pay out of pocket for insulin for an uninsured loved one and it went from almost $400 per vial down to $30 per vial thanks to the Democrats. Whoever owns the Republicans would never have let that gem through.

I pay $10 for a dozen eggs and other crazy grocery prices every week thanks to the democrats. My tax dollars helped pay for really stupid shit like a “transgender opera” in Colombia, thanks to the democrats. The US had been under mass illegal alien invasion for the last four years, thanks to the democrats. Our kids schools are (or were) stocked with graphic sexual content and lgbtq trash, thanks to the democrats. 

The list goes on and on and on.

Wrong surrounds you, and there's no place for you people to stand. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

How weak is your argument when you have to resort to insults like this? Are you in grade 8? 

How weak are you that you can't even get past the insults? 

Now don't be a p*ssy and make a counterargument. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

How weak are you that you can't even get past the insults? 

Now don't be a p*ssy and make a counterargument. ;) 

They don't have a counter argument. As usual this is all they have.

@Radiorum  went into a tailspin and meltdown and accused me of saying things that never were said repetitively when questioned on his belief that physical sexual organs are a result of brain activity, and @Matthew  just got done having an utter meltdown when challenged on what he means when he says something is or is not "legitimate".  And absolutely exploded when challenged to explain his position. 

These are not people who think for themselves. They listen to the talking points of their echo chambers and then freak out if you challenge that.  Then it's all lies and ad hominems 

Sounds like @Barquentine  has a little bit of the same problem.   He literally chastised you for insults and then insulted you  in the next sentence.   😂   I mean it's like they can't even hear what they sound like :) 

  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
15 hours ago, Radiorum said:

It's always been understood that White lives matter. That has never been brought into question. Black lives, not so much. So, to say "Black lives matter" is to correct a misapprehension that led to the killing, of, say, Emmett Till.  

It is exactly this attitude that is the problem.

You ignore the white people who are abused and killed by police and you make the problem about race when the problem is about police corruption and bad police tactics across the board. 

You are not interested in solving the real problems, you just want to play the race hustling game for cheap political points. 

You likely have never even heard of people like Daniel Shaver. 

 

 

Posted
14 hours ago, Radiorum said:

The Black Lives Matter movement grew out of a series of high-profile killings of Black people by police.

No, it grew from a lie. The lie of "hands up, don't shoot"

A police officer was viciously attacked by a black man and killed him in a justified use of force to defend himself as he was charging back at him. 

Folks like you pushed the lie, pushed the madness, that led to riots and violence in the streets and that outrage based on a lie has been exploited to this day. 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Who are "they"?

Considering the topic of this thread that is about the funniest question you could have asked  :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
15 hours ago, Radiorum said:

That the US valued Black lives less than White lives is just a matter of the historical record. Thousands of Black Americans have been lynched. How many White people do you figure?

The ignorance. 

Plenty of white people were lynched throughout American history including those who helped black people. 

I guess they don't matter though. 

The only thing that matters is this bogus narrative pushed by people like you to drive racial tensions for cheap political gain. Damn the costs. Its folks like you that incited the violence for an entire summer in 2020. 

 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Matthew said:

Yup. That sums up most of the sad Smeagol-esque right wing losers here. They've lost the power of normal human connection. It's why they hang out here all the time even on holidays and such.

LOL, you are calling people right-wing losers while responding to a comment criticizing people for name-calling... 

  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

  went into a tailspin and meltdown and accused me of saying things that never were said repetitively when questioned on his belief that physical sexual organs are a result of brain activity,

I never went into a tailspin. I never had a meltdown. I never professed a "belief that physical sexual organs are a result of brain activity." Nothing remotely like that. But if that if how you understood my plain English, that explains a lot. 

Furthermore, I did not present a belief, but scientific information.

55 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

These are not people who think for themselves. They listen to the talking points of their echo chambers and then freak out if you challenge that.  Then it's all lies and ad hominems 

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

Matthew 7:3-5

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Furthermore, I did not present a belief, but scientific information.

So... you don't believe it?

You are just trying to be cute and avoid having to answer for the stupidity you are pushing here and do in fact advocate for and believe. 

 

  • Thanks 1

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

So... you don't believe it?

We don't use the word "belief" in science. Science does not require faith, but evidence.

So, for example, it would be wrong to say you believe or you don't believe in the theory of evolution.

You'd say, that a scientific hypothesis/theory is accepted or rejected, depending on the evidence there is to support it.

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

I never went into a tailspin. I never had a meltdown. I never professed a "belief that physical sexual organs are a result of brain activity." Nothing remotely like that. But if that if how you understood my plain English, that explains a lot. 

 

You did you did and you did.

And now you're doing what many have also pointed out as being something very common for you, denying what you very clearly said once you realize how stupid it makes you look.

Go back and reread it. An entire section is full of you accusing me of things I never said making assumptions about how I feel about things that I've never commented on and generally just you having a hissy fit. And you absolutely profess to belief Sexual genitalia development are result of mental development. I pointed it out at the time.

I can understand why you're a little ashamed of it and want to deny it but that is precisely what happened

6 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

Matthew 7:3-5

 

Oh look, another example of you not being able to articulate your own thoughts in your own words and having to rely on someone else's talking points.  

And to top it off you're indulging in hypocrisy given that you don't believe in god or is teachings.

LOL i can't think of a better example of you proving me right ;)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
Just now, Radiorum said:

We don't use the word "belief" in science. Science does not require faith, but evidence.

So, for example, it would be wrong to say you believe or you don't believe in the theory of evolution.

You'd say, that a scientific hypothesis/theory is accepted or rejected, depending on the evidence there is to support it.

 

You have no idea what science is. You are not a scientist and you ignore the science every single time it winds up being inconvenient.

And if you were a scientist you would know that what you just said is complete bullshit. In fact belief plays a huge role in science, and I'm specifically thinking of quantum physics and relativity which are some of the most sciency of possible sciences.

And it would be absolutely correct to say you believe in the theory of evolution. It is perfectly normal common and in fact prevalent that scientists believe in things long before the evidence appears to prove it and then work towards the proof

Scientists just last year won the Nobel Prize for proving something that Albert Einstein believed strongly was true but could not prove mathematically or by experiment. We have operated on the belief that it's probably true for almost a hundred years but we never knew that it was until these scientists were able to prove it with certainty.

 

Is there anything you ever talk about that you understand and know? It seems like everything that comes out of your mouth is just some sort of fiction that you've created to propose a narrative. But you are a scientist in the same way that Pee-wee Herman is a professional boxer

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

You did you did and you did.

Holy gaslighting. Lol. 

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you absolutely profess to belief Sexual genitalia development are result of mental development.

I know what I said. You clearly do not.

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I can understand why you're a little ashamed of it

Is this gonna cost me five more cents?

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look, another example of you not being able to articulate your own thoughts in your own words and having to rely on someone else's talking points.  

Why re-invent the wheel? The words fit.

Posted
Just now, Radiorum said:

Holy gaslighting. Lol. 

Yeah no. Gas lighting is something else kiddo. Don't use words if you don't understand what they mean.

Quote

I know what I said. You clearly do not.

As I said, I get why you're lying about that now considering.

 

Quote

Is this gonna cost me five more cents?

Okay that was actually funny :) 

 

Quote

Why re-invent the wheel? The words fit.

They don't of course. You think that they sound pithy and you think that by providing a quotation you'll sound deeper and more educated than you are. But in fact they don't actually fit the situation very well at all and the reason you lean on them isn't because they are pithy and relevant but rather because you are incapable of articulating your own thoughts and beliefs on things as we have seen many many times now.

You hope that by sharing the words of someone who is credibleit will make you appear credible. Because you are not smart you hope that presenting the words of people who are considered smart will hide that fact.

I'm sure that was very effective in high school. I'm afraid this is a slightly more sophisticated crowd for the most part, 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
9 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

We don't use the word "belief" in science. Science does not require faith, but evidence.

So, for example, it would be wrong to say you believe or you don't believe in the theory of evolution.

You'd say, that a scientific hypothesis/theory is accepted or rejected, depending on the evidence there is to support it.

 

You are playing a dumb game. There is no sound science to back up what you do in fact believe here. 

 

 

 

Posted
On 2/7/2025 at 9:55 AM, Black Dog said:

It's also funny when people like this loser who no doubt fancy themselves "free thinkers" always end up parroting all the same buzzwords that other "free thinkers" are using that they in turn read online from other "free thinkers" and so on.

In all my time on this forum, @Deluge has had nothing constructive to post. He usually only does drive-by insults. The "ignore" feature is a godsend, when dealing with him.

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Gas lighting is something else kiddo.

Nope. I meant what I said. You practice psychological manipulation, but sorry it doesn't work on me.

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

As I said, I get why you're lying about that now considering.

See what I mean?

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Okay that was actually funny

Thank you. I think laughter is our greatest gift.

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You think that they sound pithy and you think that by providing a quotation you'll sound deeper and more educated than you are. But in fact they don't actually fit the situation very well at all and the reason you lean on them isn't because they are pithy and relevant but rather because you are incapable of articulating your own thoughts and beliefs on things as we have seen many many times now.

You hope that by sharing the words of someone who is credibleit will make you appear credible. Because you are not smart you hope that presenting the words of people who are considered smart will hide that fact.

I'm sure that was very effective in high school. I'm afraid this is a slightly more sophisticated crowd for the most part, 

I'm tossing you another nickel.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...