gatomontes99 Posted August 23, 2024 Report Posted August 23, 2024 (edited) Act Blue is being credibly accused of Smurfing: In criminal circles, they call it smurfing. It’s the practice of breaking up large transactions into smaller ones — little like the Smurfs, the blue cartoon creatures that inhabited Saturday morning TV screens in the 1980s. The illicit goal of smurfing is to get around current banking regulations requiring financial institutions to report transactions exceeding $10,000 through federal suspicious activity reports (SAR). It’s money laundering by any other name, and it’s often conducted over many accounts. Of course Democrats are cheating. Edited August 23, 2024 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Rebound Posted August 23, 2024 Report Posted August 23, 2024 (edited) 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Act Blue is being credibly accused of Smurfing: In criminal circles, they call it smurfing. It’s the practice of breaking up large transactions into smaller ones — little like the Smurfs, the blue cartoon creatures that inhabited Saturday morning TV screens in the 1980s. The illicit goal of smurfing is to get around current banking regulations requiring financial institutions to report transactions exceeding $10,000 through federal suspicious activity reports (SAR). It’s money laundering by any other name, and it’s often conducted over many accounts. Of course Democrats are cheating. Your “evidence” is a handful of Republican politicians making baseless accusations without a shred of evidence. Wow. We’re just shaking in our boots. To be clear: No evidence of any kind. Zero. Zip. Nada. These are allegations made by Republicans against Democrats. IOW, Election Interference 101. Weaponizing Justice against political rivals. Big Whoop-Dee-Doo. Edited August 23, 2024 by Rebound 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
gatomontes99 Posted August 23, 2024 Author Report Posted August 23, 2024 Should we start a poll to see how many of us gave mo ey to a political campaign via a prepaid gift card? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Fluffypants Posted August 23, 2024 Report Posted August 23, 2024 1 hour ago, Rebound said: Your “evidence” is a handful of Republican politicians making baseless accusations without a shred of evidence. Wow. We’re just shaking in our boots. To be clear: No evidence of any kind. Zero. Zip. Nada. These are allegations made by Republicans against Democrats. IOW, Election Interference 101. Weaponizing Justice against political rivals. Big Whoop-Dee-Doo. Are you kidding me how can you say "Weaponizing Justice against political rivales" with a straight face? You mean like the DNC has been doing to Donald Trump Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.