Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO!!!!  25 million reads per paper and millions of subscriptions or whatever and you're saying thats not evidence it's widely read :)

Ok snowflake :) LOLOLOL

No you illiterate dipshit I said that's not evidence it's widely read across political lines. I even italicized the relevant part thinking that even you wouldn't be dumb enough to miss it but I guess I overestimated you yet again.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Black Dog said:

No you illiterate dipshit I said that's not evidence it's widely read across political lines. I even italicized the relevant part thinking that even you wouldn't be dumb enough to miss it but I guess I overestimated you yet again.

LOL -  in the very next line it pointed out it makes fun of everybody including trump etc and with that kind of readership it's showing up everywhere :)

Sorry kiddo - i know it really punches you right in the echo chamber to hear it but it's popular widely :)  And people repost it everywhere when it's that popular. 

You're reading it now aren't you? You ARE on the left aren't you?

Gotcha :)  LOLOLOL

37 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Branching out from your usual shit-fetish, shiteater?

Well obviously a good writer writes for his audience :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

LOL -  in the very next line it pointed out it makes fun of everybody including trump etc and with that kind of readership it's showing up everywhere :)

That's an assumption not supported by the evidence on offer.

Also worth pointing out something that seems to have escaped your notice even though it was in your own source (which you didn't read), that the Bee was sold in 2020 and has for the last four years featured exclusively pro conservative/anti-left content.

Quote

Sorry kiddo - i know it really punches you right in the echo chamber to hear it but it's popular widely :)  And people repost it everywhere when it's that popular. 

LOL "everyone in my echo chamber posts it therefore it's popular" you're totally retarded.

Quote

You're reading it now aren't you? You ARE on the left aren't you?

No? the only time I have ever seen it it is when some conservative boomer posts something from it and the algorithm sticks it in my "for you" tab, I have literally never clicked on a Bee post or the site in my life.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

That's an assumption not supported by the evidence on offer.

Also worth pointing out something that seems to have escaped your notice even though it was in your own source (which you didn't read), that the Bee was sold in 2020 and has for the last four years featured exclusively pro conservative/anti-left content.

LOL "everyone in my echo chamber posts it therefore it's popular" you're totally retarded.

No? the only time I have ever seen it it is when some conservative boomer posts something from it and the algorithm sticks it in my "for you" tab, I have literally never clicked on a Bee post or the site in my life.

Sorry kid but it's quite clear. 

I realize this upsets you because of your echo chamber nonsense but that won't change the facts. 

And as  you admit even you've seen it.  :) 

it's the message getting out there and sticking your head in the sand doesn't change that. 

It must be absolutely exhausting to spend so much time and energy lying to yourself to prop up your false beliefs.  Maybe you need a nap?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sorry kid but it's quite clear. 

I realize this upsets you because of your echo chamber nonsense but that won't change the facts. 

And as  you admit even you've seen it.  :) 

"Seeing something on your feed" and "actively seeking out content" are two different things which you would know if you weren't retarded, but alas!

Quote

it's the message getting out there and sticking your head in the sand doesn't change that. 

There's no indication anyone who isn't already in a right wing content bubble is reading this junk and your usual crowing about how right you are in spite of having no proof of your assertions doesn't change that.

Quote

It must be absolutely exhausting to spend so much time and energy lying to yourself to prop up your false beliefs.  Maybe you need a nap?

Oh look, the NPC has activated one of his four dialogue trees.

Posted
Just now, Black Dog said:

"Seeing something on your feed" and "actively seeking out content" are two different things which you would know if you weren't retarded, but alas!

 

Nobody said anything about actively seeking anything out ;) 

Swing and a miss yet again kiddo.  

This message is getting out there and there's starting to be pushback. She can dodge a little longer but people are going to hold it against her pretty soon. She looks like a coward, and people don't vote for cowards. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody said anything about actively seeking anything out ;) 

Swing and a miss yet again kiddo.  

Wait you're going to count just scrolling pst something in your TL as "reading it". LOL wtaf.

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Wait you're going to count just scrolling pst something in your TL as "reading it". LOL wtaf.

Wait you read it, commented on it, have spent a couple days discussing it and you're going to claim you were just scrolling past?  :)  LOL!!!

Man you never miss a chance to make yourself look pathetic.  :)  This is why nobody respects you,  you could at least put SOME effort into making your nonsense at least a LITTLE believable  :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Wait you read it, commented on it, have spent a couple days discussing it and you're going to claim you were just scrolling past:)  LOL!!!

Man you never miss a chance to make yourself look pathetic.  :)  This is why nobody respects you,  you could at least put SOME effort into making your nonsense at least a LITTLE believable  :) 

LOL you've lost track of your own argument here already, amazing.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL you've lost track of your own argument here already, amazing.

My argument was that it's got wide distribution across multiple political leanings. 

You've read it. I've read it.  25 million other people have read it.  LOL :)

It's the message that's getting out there :)   And while YOU are preprogrammed to only believe your echo chamber talking points there's a lot of mushy middle dems who aren't, and are going to start to lose faith in her :) 

Nice try at changing the subject kiddo but, she's already setting herself up for a loss. The seeds are being planted, and if she shows up in the public to deal with that she loses the election. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

My argument was that it's got wide distribution across multiple political leanings. 

You've read it. I've read it.  25 million other people have read it.  LOL :)

And you've provided zero evidence of that and are now trying to contort yourself around the idea that my commenting in a headline you posted from an article I didn't click on is the same thing as "reading" it. It's absolute nonsense from top to bottom.

Quote

It's the message that's getting out there :)   And while YOU are preprogrammed to only believe your echo chamber talking points there's a lot of mushy middle dems who aren't, and are going to start to lose faith in her :) 

bob.jpg

Posted
9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And you've provided zero evidence of that and are now trying to contort yourself around the idea that my commenting in a headline you posted from an article I didn't click on is the same thing as "reading" it. It's absolute nonsense from top to bottom.

 

So you were provided with tons of evidence including sources, have absolutely no evidence to the contrary, spent days talking about it yourself And now you're in full-blown denial trying desperately to avoid the facts :)

 

This is why the left are such losers :) 

Sorry kiddo, it's getting widespread attention across multiple political platforms and it's what people are starting to think. And you lying about it just because it hurts your feelings  is not going to change that.

She is planting the seeds of her own failure. If she doesn't find a way to deal with that by the beginning of September she's going to be in real trouble. If she appears without a teleprompter and finally cameras she will likely lose the election

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
33 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you were provided with tons of evidence including sources, have absolutely no evidence to the contrary, spent days talking about it yourself And now you're in full-blown denial trying desperately to avoid the facts :)

You didn't give any evidence for your claim it was widely read across the political spectrum. You cited some numbers that would indicate it's widely read and then you assumed that some of those people might be non-right wing people but that assumption is not evidence.

Your other piece of evidence was a statement from its long-departed founder that they go after all sides, but again, that's not evidence of it being widely read across the political spectrum.

Once again, you have proven yourself completely incapable of supporting your own arguments, but at least this time you didn't cite a source that completely proved you wrong, so that's progress of a sort.

Quote

Sorry kiddo, it's getting widespread attention across multiple political platforms and it's what people are starting to think. And you lying about it just because it hurts your feelings  is not going to change that.

On 8/14/2024 at 10:58 AM, CdnFox said:

As hilarious as the "article" is (babylon bee for those who missed it)  the fact is this is the message that's starting to get out there at the moment. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

it's the message getting out there and sticking your head in the sand doesn't change that. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

This message is getting out there and there's starting to be pushback. 

59 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's the message that's getting out there :)   

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcROqugBVyx764iZdxH6i4O

lmao

 
Posted
25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You didn't give any evidence for your claim it was widely read across the political spectrum. You cited some numbers that would indicate it's widely read and then you assumed that some of those people might be non-right wing people but that assumption is not evidence.

Your other piece of evidence was a statement from its long-departed founder that they go after all sides, but again, that's not evidence of it being widely read across the political spectrum.

Once again, you have proven yourself completely incapable of supporting your own arguments, but at least this time you didn't cite a source that completely proved you wrong, so that's progress of a sort.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcROqugBVyx764iZdxH6i4O

lmao

 

LOL -  continuing to deny the evidence and facts wont' help you kiddo. 

In fact i did give evidence, in fact you yourself are proof of it. 

And you clearly know it's true because you're desperately flailing like an !diot trying to repeat the same lies over and over instead of dealing with the issue that's scaring the bejeezuz out of you  which is namely that this is a growing problem for harris and she's planting the seeds of her own failure. 

But hey -  maybe you LIKE the feel of sand around your head,  you keep it stuck there if it makes you feel better :)  LOL

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

LOL -  continuing to deny the evidence and facts wont' help you kiddo. 

In fact i did give evidence,

You're lying as usual. This was your "evidence" based on a wikipedia article.

Quote

25 million at it's peak.  that's pretty widely read.  And it doesn't just do conservative content. 

Even if we accept that 25 million page views is "widely read", the type of content it does is not proof of the diversity of its readership at all.

Quote

in fact you yourself are proof of it. 

Again, I have never clicked on a Bee article, visited its website or social media accounts, if seeing and registering headlines posted by deranged losers like you here or elsewhere on the internet means i have "read" the bee then I have read the Bible because I saw one in a hotel nightstand once.

Quote

And you clearly know it's true because you're desperately flailing like an !diot trying to repeat the same lies over and over instead of dealing with the issue that's scaring the bejeezuz out of you  which is namely that this is a growing problem for harris and she's planting the seeds of her own failure. 

No, that's your thing, remember?

Quote

Sorry kiddo, it's getting widespread attention across multiple political platforms and it's what people are starting to think. And you lying about it just because it hurts your feelings  is not going to change that.

On 8/14/2024 at 10:58 AM, CdnFox said:

As hilarious as the "article" is (babylon bee for those who missed it)  the fact is this is the message that's starting to get out there at the moment. 

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

it's the message getting out there and sticking your head in the sand doesn't change that. 

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

This message is getting out there and there's starting to be pushback. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

It's the message that's getting out there :)   

Maybe post a few more times about it and that will help it manifest lmao.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You're lying as usual. This was your "evidence" based on a wikipedia article.

Even if we accept that 25 million page views is "widely read", the type of content it does is not proof of the diversity of its readership at all.

Again, I have never clicked on a Bee article, visited its website or social media accounts, if seeing and registering headlines posted by deranged losers like you here or elsewhere on the internet means i have "read" the bee then I have read the Bible because I saw one in a hotel nightstand once.

No, that's your thing, remember?

 

Maybe post a few more times about it and that will help it manifest lmao.

So - your go to always seems to be to deny simple truths and hope if you lie hard enough people will get distracted. 

Which is very leftiest of you :)  but my favorite is you pretending you havent been exposed to the thing you've been discussing for days :)   LOLOLOL  that's priceless :) 

This publication has widespread distribution across political lines and this message is getting out there. 

She's going to have to find a way to deal with it because it'll cause her numbers to fall over time and if she goes in front of the public without a teleprompter she loses the election. 

And you know i'm right or you wouldn't be so frantic and pathetic in your denial :) 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
Just now, CdnFox said:

So - your go to always seems to be to deny simple truths and hope if you lie hard enough people will get distracted. 

Which is very leftiest of you :)  but my favorite is you pretending you havent been exposed to the thing you've been discussing for days :)   LOLOLOL  that's priceless :) 

Your original metric for measuring its popularity was website visits now you're trying to claim that simply being aware of its existence is the same as reading it. You have shit for brains if you think this is fooling anyone.

Quote

This publication has widespread distribution across political lines and this message is getting out there. 

90fnp0.jpg

Posted
22 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Your original metric for measuring its popularity was website visits now you're trying to claim that simply being aware of its existence is the same as reading it. You have shit for brains if you think this is fooling anyone.

 

LOL - nothing makes me more amused than watching you and your friends have a complete meltdown when faced with the truth  :) 

I posted their actual publication and distribution and subscribership. You're the one who claimed there's NO PROOOOOOOFFF ANY of those tens of millions of people were democrats :) Not one!  Couldn't be!!!

And then i pointed out that on TOP of that - people post them all over the place including places like this where people like YOU see them and are exposed. Which you were. 

Nice try tho ';)   Swirm baby squirm :)  


Here's the latest by the way

Kamala Harris Suggests Americans Struggling To Make Ends Meet Just Try Sleeping With Their Boss

 

"So if we examine the passage of time in making ends meet, we can see that the easiest solution is to just try sleeping around with your boss," Kamala explained, cackling at every pause for breath. "HAHAHAHA! It works every time — and there's great significance to the passage of every time. Sleeping with your boss is very simple: you just sleep with them in order to make ends meet. That way your ends will meet. There is great significance to making ends meet. HAHAHAHA!!"

While several political commentators have compared Kamala's advice to Marie Antoinette's infamous "Let them eat cake," most mainstream media outlets have thoroughly debunked this far-right conspiracy theory with the irrefutable observation that "Kamala never told anyone to eat cake — she just advised sleeping around."

At publishing time, Kamala Harris had also suggested that Americans who are struggling financially should just try getting hired in a better job as DEI picks.

 
And OHHH NOOOEEES - NOW YOU"VE SEEN THAT ONE TOOOOOOQ!!!!!!
 
And i see  you still can't cope with or address the issue at hand :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
38 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - nothing makes me more amused than watching you and your friends have a complete meltdown when faced with the truth  :) 

I posted their actual publication and distribution and subscribership. You're the one who claimed there's NO PROOOOOOOFFF ANY of those tens of millions of people were democrats :) Not one!  Couldn't be!!!

 

Oh look you're lying again.

Quote

And then i pointed out that on TOP of that - people post them all over the place including places like this where people like YOU see them and are exposed. Which you were. 

Again: being aware of its existence via "exposure" to headlines, tweets is not the same as reading it. You total dunce.

Quote

Here's the latest by the way

Huh is this the kind of content that is supposed to appeal to it's massive readership from the centre left side of the political spectrum. LOL seems like humiliating yourself is another part of your NPC programming.

Posted
14 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Oh look you're lying again.

Again: being aware of its existence via "exposure" to headlines, tweets is not the same as reading it. You total dunce.

Huh is this the kind of content that is supposed to appeal to it's massive readership from the centre left side of the political spectrum. LOL seems like humiliating yourself is another part of your NPC programming.

And as usual when you're exposed as being dishonest as hell you just resort to cheap insults that a 7 year old would be embarrased by.  

Yawn. 

This publication has widespread distribution across political lines and this message is getting out there. 

She's going to have to find a way to deal with it because it'll cause her numbers to fall over time and if she goes in front of the public without a teleprompter she loses the election. 

And you know i'm right or you wouldn't be so frantic and pathetic in your denial 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And as usual when you're exposed as being dishonest as hell you just resort to cheap insults that a 7 year old would be embarrased by.  

Yawn. 

This publication has widespread distribution across political lines and this message is getting out there. 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcROqugBVyx764iZdxH6i4O

Posted
9 hours ago, Black Dog said:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcROqugBVyx764iZdxH6i4O

oh Noes!! I've broken his brain and now he's stuck on his screensaver!!! :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, herbie said:

She declined an interview. Sounds like she'd not the one totally desperate doesn't it?

It sounds like she's desperate. 

Quote


Just let her opponent keep flapping his gums, he'll win it all for her.

The problem is that there's a number of issues which are gaining traction she has to address. 

Like I said, I can see why she would want a basement campaign. It worked for Biden. But I don't think that's going to be a practical choice for her. She does have some history that she has to address with regards to being in power for the last 4 years and she's got other elements to her life that will need to be explained. If she doesn't find a way to successfully address that she will probably lose unless trump talks himself out of the election entirely

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...