Texas murder conviction overturned by Governor Abbott. (This is JUSTICE.)

[reason10]

 

1. I support the right to protest, yes.  All of this happened with a right-wing populist protest in Ottawa and we accepted that.   If someone had been killed, I would be horrified and moved by that.  

I would NEVER say "they took out the trash".

Animals who do THIS

are trash. And if one of those animals buys what YOUR EXTREMIST NAZI LEFT WING SIDE OF THE AISLE REFERS TO AS AN ASSAULT RIFLE and points it at a law abiding citizen in a vehicle, that is a threat. That law abiding citizen who then fires and KILLS that animal is taking out the trash, and protecting the rest of the population from a dangerous predator.

That's how things work in a constitutional society.

[reason10]

22 hours ago, Aristides said:

In 2021 almost 49,000 Americans died gun related deaths, compared to just over 32,000 from motor vehicles. That would be a disgrace in any civilized country.

It depends on the cause of the death.

In the motor vehicle field, a drunk who drives his car of a cliff may be tragic, but hardly a disgrace. A drunk who drives that same car into a school bus and kills 30 children would probably be a disgrace.

By the same token, robberies by animals who VIOLATED GUN LAWS IN THE FIRST PLACE would be considered a disgrace, but a LEGAL gun owner defending his/her home and/or property would deadly force would be something to celebrate. Taking more trash out of the gene pool.

It's about cause. At least that's how the criminal justice system sees it.

That BLM animal got what he deserved. Perry LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY defended his life by shooting that animal. There is no disgrace about that.

[reason10]

22 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I support the right to protest, yes.  All of this happened with a right-wing populist protest in Ottawa and we accepted that.   If someone had been killed, I would be horrified and moved by that.  

I would NEVER say "they took out the trash".

If you don't want to retract your statement, that's fine.  But I don't see what there is to discuss here.

So you have no problem with animals blocking traffic? If that action prevented an ambulance from reaching a hospital in time to save a life, would you consider charging that ENTIRE CROWD with homicide? Or are you more selective as to the acceptability of the cause of death?

Whether it is right wing or Nazi, blocking highways in protest should be a CRIME and those animals should be arrested and charged. (Gee! Here in Florida, our brilliant governor passed a law providing us with just such protection against those animals.) And of one of those animals points an ASSAULT RIFLE at an innocent driver, that driver should have EVERY right to defend himself with deadly force.

Gee! Are you REALLY going to try to justify street blocking animals carrying ASSAULT RIFLES, or are your goose stepping ideals reserved  only for disarming law abiding citizens?

[reason10]

You have to have a license to drive a truck. The truck also has to be licensed. Almost 50% more people are killed by firearms in the US than all motor vehicles combined. Which is the greater threat?

In the United States, there is no constitutional right to own or drive motor vehicles. Now I'm starting to wonder if you left wing goose steppers ever made it out of the second grade.

Your 2nd Amendment isn't worth shit anywhere but your own country and it doesn't give your gun companies the right to dump guns in someone else's country. Get over yourself.

We will patiently wait while you produce a credible link to back up that lie about gun companies dumping guns in someone else's country.

Yeah, I know. There WAS an instance where one of our WORST presidents of all time actually DID dump guns into another country. That was called the Fast And Furious scandal, (once again  proving that affirmative action is a p!ss poor way to elect presidents.)

https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=333

You still have to prove that GUN COMPANIES did the dumping. Last time I checked, gun companies were in the business of selling LEGAL FIREARMS to the  public.

Go ahead.  Produce proof that Colt Firearms DUMPED pistols in any country.

We'll wait.

Or admit you made that up.

[reason10]

17 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I trust that our security employees should be able to manage that.


Does it feel to you like we don't have anything to discuss here ?  Feels like that to me.  I guess I'm finding out how you feel about things, but beyond that...

2. The irony is that you are accepting people breaking the law to commit violence against perceived lawbreakers.  So... I guess you like vigilantism ?  I don't know, just seems that way.
 

Excuse me, that animal POINTED AN ASSAULT RIFLE at a law abiding citizen. Why aren't you goose steppers referring to that as vigilantism? Perry merely DEFENDED HIS LIFE, WHICH HE HAS A RIGHT TO DO. How in the name of Zeus's Butthole is that somehow vigilantism?

If an animal threatens someone, that someone has the RIGHT to defend himself, even with deadly force. That is NOT vigilantism, (except to a Nazi who wants to start filling up prison camps again.)

[reason10]

22 hours ago, User said:

You are in a thread talking about the why you now can't see...

There are always concerns, that alone doesn't justify breaking the law to impact others... AND my point continues to be, if that if you are going to support breaking the law to impact others, don't be surprised when those others respond. 

Don't act appalled that someone acted in self-defense when they are surrounded and blocked in by protestors, with one of them threatening them while armed. 

Here's an idea which might cure this problem once and for all.

If the crowd surrounds a car and prevents it from leaving, that is attempted car jacking. In Texas that is a second degree FELONY. So ARREST those animals, send them to prison and they cannot vote with a felony on their record.

In Florida, animals blocking a street in protest are committing a misdemeanor. Maybe the Texas legislature should go a step further and make that a FELONY, which costs those animals the right to vote if convicted.

Threaten those animals with their right to vote and who knows? Maybe a few of them will get a real job and not do that crap any more.

[reason10]

This should be a legal matter not one of race or politics. 

The legal matter should be easy. An animal in an illegal mob threatened someone in a car. That someone feared for his life and defended himself CONSTITUTIONALLY.

Actually, I've got an idea that the left wing Nazis here might just LOVE.

A new GUN CONTROL law.

Bring a firearm (ANY FIREARM THAT SHOOTS BULLETS) to a protest and it's a FELONY.

Arrest the animal, get the conviction, and the animal comes out of prison without being allowed to vote or buy a gun.

(Florida actually had a statute like that. 10 20 LIFE. Bring a gun to a crime 10 years mandatory. Fire that gun during the crime 20 years mandatory. If the bullet hits and injures someone,  LIFE IMPRISONMENT.

It's a law aimed SOLELY at people who break the law with guns.

 

[reason10]

Quote

1. I don't see it as being something we should accept or see as inevitable.  It's a low bar, to say violence would happen if someone's way is blocked.  If that's what you are saying.

Those animals weren't just blocking his car.  They were THREATENING HIS LIFE. He was ex military and didn't scare easily. And one of those animals had what you goose steppers refer to as an ASSAULT RIFLE aimed at him.

Quote

3. It doesn't seem like a principle that can be applied in any society that allows protest.  Do you believe trespassers should be subject to violence by police?  People breaking windows?  I don't.

Animals who trespass should be arrested and put in jail. Animals who break windows should be arrested and put in jail. Do you think those animals will just give up when the cops tell them they are under arrest? Are you stupid?

LEGAL protest is a constitutionally protected RIGHT. Committing FELONIES in the process of that process is NOT protected by the Constitution.

And animals who threaten private citizens should have to fear for their lives, if they believe in engaging in TERRORISM.

BLM is a racist TERRORIST criminal organization. They committed a crime when they surrounded that car. It's called CARJACKING, which is a felony. The animal who  pointed that rifle at the drive committed ASSAULT, which is also a felony.

 

And the driver feared for his life and took action. And FINALLY a Texas Governor who has READ THE FCKING CONSTITUTION found that man who defended himself committed no crime.

 

Let a group of animals surround your car and see what you would do. Let one of them point an assault rifle at you and see what you would do.

[Black Dog]

On 5/23/2024 at 4:33 AM, reason10 said:

No one told those terrorist BLM animals to carry COMBAT WEAPONS at a protest and point them at innocent bystanders. All Perry did was LEGALLY defend himself and take out the trash.

Why do you hate the second amendment?

On 5/29/2024 at 11:19 PM, reason10 said:

Those animals weren't just blocking his car.  They were THREATENING HIS LIFE. He was ex military and didn't scare easily. And one of those animals had what you goose steppers refer to as an ASSAULT RIFLE aimed at him.

 

That never happened.

[reason10]

Quote

Why do you hate the second amendment?

Are you just plain stupid? What does the statement I made have to do with the Second Amendment? An 1diot/animal pointed a rifle at a car driver and the driver LEGALLY defended his life with deadly force.

In truth, I do not like guns. Don't want them around me. Don't want to be anywhere near them when they are fired. But because I'm not a GOOSE STEPPING DemoNAZI, I recognize everyone else's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to carry a gun. The driver of that car was armed. And when that animal pointed the rifle at him, he defended himself CONSTITUTIONALLY.

I don't have problems with BLM terrorists owning guns. But if they carry them in a riot and use them to try to car jack an innocent bystander, that innocent bystander has the RIGHT to defend himself.

 

 

Quote

That never happened.

Yes it did.