Rebound Posted October 14, 2023 Report Posted October 14, 2023 A judge in Colorado has rejected Donald Trump’s pathetic efforts to stop a trial which will disqualify him from running for President. Trump’s motion to dismiss claimed three things: 1) The 14th Amendment applies to Federal “officers,” but not the President. 2) The 14th Amendment applies to those to took an oath to “Support” the U.S. Constitution. The Presidential oath uses the words “preserve, protect, and defend,” not “Support.” 3) This lawsuit would infringe on Trump’s first amendment rights. The judge said NO to all three. Now the case proceeds to trial, and with those arguments dismissed, the case will revolve upon whether Trump “ engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” The prosecution against Trump will argue this, among other things: Many people have been convicted of participating in acts of insurrection against the United States, including multiple acts and convictions of seditious conspiracy… and Donald Trump, on multiple occasions, gave aid and comfort to these individuals by promising to pardon them for their crimes if he is elected. Very compelling!!! Let’s see what the court and the inevitable appeals have to say. 3 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Deluge Posted October 14, 2023 Report Posted October 14, 2023 1 hour ago, Rebound said: A judge in Colorado has rejected Donald Trump’s pathetic efforts to stop a trial which will disqualify him from running for President. Trump’s motion to dismiss claimed three things: 1) The 14th Amendment applies to Federal “officers,” but not the President. 2) The 14th Amendment applies to those to took an oath to “Support” the U.S. Constitution. The Presidential oath uses the words “preserve, protect, and defend,” not “Support.” 3) This lawsuit would infringe on Trump’s first amendment rights. The judge said NO to all three. Now the case proceeds to trial, and with those arguments dismissed, the case will revolve upon whether Trump “ engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” The prosecution against Trump will argue this, among other things: Many people have been convicted of participating in acts of insurrection against the United States, including multiple acts and convictions of seditious conspiracy… and Donald Trump, on multiple occasions, gave aid and comfort to these individuals by promising to pardon them for their crimes if he is elected. Very compelling!!! Let’s see what the court and the inevitable appeals have to say. These election interference frauds are going to get their asses handed to them again. It'll be fun to watch. lol Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted October 14, 2023 Report Posted October 14, 2023 2 hours ago, Rebound said: and Donald Trump, on multiple occasions, gave aid and comfort to these individuals by promising to pardon them for their crimes if he is elected. Donald has tried hard to distort his real motivation behind his actions (or inactions) throughout the end of his term. But, as usual, his mouth always ends up f__king him. Donald's verbal masterbation is going to end up f__king him again. His ego won't allow him to save himself by not spurting out verbal diarrhea. Bad for Donald, a blessing for America. 1 Quote
herbie Posted October 15, 2023 Report Posted October 15, 2023 Soon he'll try the excuse that though the DIrectors of the Board of company may be held liable he as Chairman of the Board is completely different.... and can't be. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.